Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Ігор Рейтерович | REITERS 🇺🇦

Channel

Ігор Рейтерович | REITERS 🇺🇦

@reiters

On this record: Topic · Observations · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

11,806subscribers

+1,810 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001460274534
TypeChannel
Username@reiters
DescriptionОперативна аналітика від політолога Ігоря Рейтеровича. Щастя для всіх, задарма, і нехай ніхто не піде обділений😉! Крім, звичайно, русні. Їй горіти у пеклі.
Created12 January 2020 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live10 November 2026
Measurements held63
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 10 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/reiters

Topic

National news — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 95% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Content that also appears on other registered channels

Posts published here appear in near-verbatim form on 12 other registered channels. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.

Matching posts — open both and compare (6 of the pairs behind the counts below)
Posted firstThenOverlapGap
@vklochok/11240910 Aug 2026, 08:06 UTC@reiters/33120 · this entry10 Aug 2026, 08:18 UTC1.0013 minutes
@vklochok/11270017 Aug 2026, 16:25 UTC@reiters/33227 · this entry17 Aug 2026, 17:42 UTC1.0076 minutes
@vklochok/11272818 Aug 2026, 13:51 UTC@reiters/33240 · this entry18 Aug 2026, 14:34 UTC1.0043 minutes
@vklochok/11293323 Aug 2026, 06:06 UTC@reiters/33329 · this entry23 Aug 2026, 06:07 UTC1.0072 seconds
@vklochok/11301725 Aug 2026, 01:48 UTC@reiters/33356 · this entry25 Aug 2026, 04:35 UTC1.002.8 hours
@vklochok/11321228 Aug 2026, 16:00 UTC@reiters/33426 · this entry28 Aug 2026, 16:08 UTC1.008 minutes
Channels this entry shares post bodies with, where at least one matching post pair has no forward credit between the two channels, or to a common source, recorded in our data
ChannelMatching postsText overlapTypical gapPublished first
@vklochok47 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.0023 minutes@vklochok (43–4)
@lachentyt28 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.0013 minutes@lachentyt (28–0)
@ukrpravda_news18 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)0.9826 minutes@ukrpravda_news (17–1)
@pervomaisk_city7 (7/7 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.001.7 hoursthis entry (6–1)
@Iutsk7 (7/7 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.0044 minutes@Iutsk (4–3)
@BerezaJuice9 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.0023 minutesthis entry (5–4)
@chornomorsk6 (6/6 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.0026 minutes@chornomorsk (4–2)
@Starkon_city5 (5/5 hand-verifiable sample passed)0.9920 minutesthis entry (5–0)
@zolochivt5 (5/5 hand-verifiable sample passed)0.9731 minutes@zolochivt (4–1)
@Tsaplienko5 (5/5 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.001.6 hours@Tsaplienko (5–0)
@in_factum10 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.0020 minutes@in_factum (10–0)
@VVgorkovenko5 (5/5 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.0022 minutesthis entry (3–2)

Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.

What this cannot establish

MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.

Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. 114 of the 115 matches recorded here fall after that date and carried no header when we read them. The rest predate reliable capture and are not evidence either way.

“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 327 comparable posts for this entry, running 5 August 2026 to 11 November 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.

The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.

  • Verbatim republication has three causes and the text separates only two: a clone/mirror, unattributed copy-paste, or BOTH channels copying a common third source that neither attributes. The spread filter (content held by at most 8 channels) reduces the third and does not remove it.
  • 'Earliest' means earliest IN THIS CORPUS. A channel ingested one page deep will look younger than a neighbour ingested in full; corpus_coverage above is there to be checked before the direction is believed.
  • shared_verified_est extrapolates the sampled pass rate over the full narrow match count; sampled/passed are the numbers actually measured.
  • Absence of a forward header is not proof of intent: Telegram lets a channel disable forward attribution, and a credit written in the body is not parsed as attribution here (mention_edge_either_way above is the closest available signal).

Recorded under the keys clone_copy · clone_mutual · clone_source, last confirmed 12 November 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Growth

9,99611,80610,9016 August 202610 November 2026
63 measurements spanning 96 days, net +1,810. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 9,725–12,078 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 63
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
10 Nov 2026, 16:4611,806+106
9 Nov 2026, 02:2911,700+37
7 Nov 2026, 18:4811,663+36
6 Nov 2026, 17:2711,627+115
5 Nov 2026, 17:2711,512+84
4 Nov 2026, 20:4711,428+80
3 Nov 2026, 21:3911,348+110
2 Nov 2026, 19:1811,238+123
1 Nov 2026, 22:1411,115+13
31 Oct 2026, 22:5811,102+57
30 Oct 2026, 22:4911,045+34
30 Oct 2026, 01:1711,011+11
28 Oct 2026, 21:4711,000+40
27 Oct 2026, 23:3510,960+27
26 Oct 2026, 21:4610,933+28
25 Oct 2026, 23:2010,905+42
24 Oct 2026, 23:5610,863+29
23 Oct 2026, 23:1710,834+35
23 Oct 2026, 01:2710,799+3
21 Oct 2026, 22:2110,796first reading

Engagement

502 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 57 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
9.23%
avg views ÷ 11,806 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,090
154 posts measured
Reaction rate
7.59%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
154
of 502 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 November 2026
Posts held502 (5 August 2026 – 12 November 2026)
Views total167,885
Reactions total12,745
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken12 Nov 2026, 09:12 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈11,500
Videos
≈860
Links
≈931

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
4m 28s
Average length
54s

Measured directly from 5 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

37,402 reactions across 482 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 26.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🤡9,99526.7%
👍6,81718.2%
🤬5,71815.3%
🔥4,79612.8%
🤔3,95510.6%
😁2,4786.63%
❤2,4416.53%
😢1,1953.20%
🥰70.019%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 502 of the 502 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 38,840 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 502 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 12 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 502 we hold a reading for · 0.2%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @reiters. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 502 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 5 August 2026 to 12 November 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 4 of 154 posts held from the last 30 days (2.60%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

12 Nov 2026, 09:08 UTC59 views7 reactionsread 12 November 2026

Українські військові уже кілька днів знову фіксують значні збої в роботі Starshield над територією України, — Зеленський. Через це є прильоти, бо засоби збиття не розвивають достатню швидкість та не встигають перехопити.

🤬6🤔1

12 Nov 2026, 07:34 UTC393 views56 reactionsread 12 November 2026

Під час переговорів в Абу-Дабі російська делегація заявила, що путін розпочав вторгнення в Україну, бо Байден не відповів на його лист 2021 року з викладом претензій щодо безпеки, – Axios.

🤡51🤬4😁1

12 Nov 2026, 06:46 UTC566 views70 reactionsread 12 November 2026

Вранці в санкт-петербурзі вибухнув автомобіль. За даними російських медіа, за кермом був полковник авіації, який загинув на місці.

🔥55❤12👍3

12 Nov 2026, 06:21 UTC683 views41 reactionsread 12 November 2026

путін зустрінеться з американськими спецпосланцями Стівом Віткоффом і Джаредом Кушнером у першій половині дня 12 листопада, – ушаков. З точки зору протоколу зустріч відбудеться "як зазвичай".

🤡35🤔5🤬1

12 Nov 2026, 05:46 UTC770 views52 reactionsread 12 November 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

🔥49👍3

11 Nov 2026, 19:42 UTC≈1,040 views97 reactionsread 12 November 2026

Війна може закінчитись до кінця року: є вікно можливостей, але я слабко вірю у результат перемовин американців з путіним, — Зеленський. • США вважають, що Україна має вийти з Донбасу для завершення війни, але це неможливо. • Чоловіки мобілізаційного віку мають бути в Україні, я хотів би щоб вони повернулися з-за кордону. • Європейці дедалі частіше піднімають тему повернення українців додому. • Очікую, що посланці Тр…

🤡86🤔9❤2

11 Nov 2026, 17:25 UTC≈1,100 views74 reactionsread 12 November 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

👍44🔥25😁5

11 Nov 2026, 16:40 UTC≈1,100 views49 reactionsread 12 November 2026

У Німеччині заявили про можливі переговори Мерца з путіним. Речник німецького уряду Штефан Корнеліус заявив у Берліні, що після завершення зустрічі в ОАЕ між німецьким федеральним канцлером та диктатором може відбутися телефонний контакт. За його словами, сторони досягли певного розуміння базових принципів майбутніх домовленостей.

🤔47❤1🤡1

11 Nov 2026, 16:22 UTC≈1,060 views61 reactionsread 12 November 2026

Переговори були непростими. Позиція України залишається незмінною, – Буданов про переговори в Абу-Дабі. Йдеться про зупинку війни, формування дієвої архітектури безпеки, яка гарантуватиме стійкість миру й унеможливить повторення російської агресії. Окремо обговорювали повернення українських полонених. У цьому питанні, за словами Буданова, вдалося досягти суттєвого результату.

🤡41🤔19❤1

11 Nov 2026, 13:34 UTC981 views126 reactionsread 12 November 2026
Video

Давид Арахамія ... Я в цьому процесі з 2022 року і можу чесно сказати, що це були одні з найважчих переговорів. Думаю, росіяни приїхали з дуже-дуже жорсткими директивами, і пом'якшити розмову було справді важко. Але те, як ви побудували обговорення — через картину післявоєнного майбутнього для обох країн, — на мою думку, відкрило діалог, і ми почали працювати продуктивніше. По-друге, найважливіше — це люди. Ми, бе…

🤡106🤔12❤3😁3🤬2

11 Nov 2026, 11:49 UTC≈1,050 views60 reactionsread 12 November 2026

Кушнер анонсував візит з Віткоффом до путіна у четвер.

🤡42🤬18

11 Nov 2026, 11:46 UTC≈1,080 views42 reactionsread 12 November 2026

В Абу-Дабі завершився другий раунд переговорів у тристоронньому формат Україна-США-росія. За словами джерела УП, наразі розпочалася зустріч української сторони з європейцями. За словами нашого співрозмовника, інформація видання The Telegraph про те, що Україна нібито відхилила нову пропозицію Сполучених Штатів щодо перегляду кордонів, спрямовану на розблокування мирних переговорів з росією, не відповідає дійсності.

🤡29🤬10😢3

Showing the 12 most recent of 502 posts we hold for @reiters. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts edited after publishing

@reiters edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
26 August 2026
Most recent edit
26 August 2026

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Генеральний штаб ЗСУ
@GeneralStaffZSU · 64,512
8 posts
Валерій Залужний
@Zaluzhnui · 241,071
5 posts
Повітряні Сили ЗС України / Air Force of the Armed Forces of Ukraine
@kpszsu · 939,064
5 posts
Служба безпеки України
@SBUkr · 293,730
4 posts
Шрайк Ньюс
@ShrikeNews · 97,757
4 posts
In Factum
@in_factum · 45,301
4 posts
Валерій Калниш | Чорна лампа 🇺🇦
@blacklampa · 11,313
2 posts
ЕП. Економічні хроніки війни
@epravda · 19,285
2 posts
НАБУ
@nab_ukraine · 50,973
2 posts
Сергій Корецький | Премʼєр-міністр 🇺🇦
@Koretskyi_official · 11,651
1 post
NaftogazUA
@NaftogazUA · 19,668
1 post
Шалом православні
@StopRPZ · 165
1 post
Анатолій Штефан "Штірліц"
@a_shtirlitz · 135,750
1 post
Абсолютно надійне джерело
@absolutely_reliable · 7,829
1 post
Бабель
@babel · 77,885
1 post
Цензор.НЕТ | Новини України та світу, війна та аналітика
@censor_net · 185,256
1 post
5 канал | 5.ua
@channel5UA · 53,570
1 post
ҐРУНТ
@gruntmedia · 147,935
1 post
КіберБорошно | CyberBoroshno
@kiber_boroshno · 69,760
1 post
PEKHNO🇺🇦
@pekhno_news · 68,249
1 post
Євген Магда/Переможний Магдіяж
@rozumaha · 24,654
1 post
STERNENKO
@ssternenko · 880,350
1 post
Tkach
@teleTKACH · 61,754
1 post
Бавовна
@ukrbavovna · 802,218
1 post
Залізний нардеп
@yzheleznyak · 101,483
1 post

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 14 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Євген Магда/Переможний Магдіяж
@rozumaha · 24,654
Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 19 September 2026
Omelyan News
@Omelyan_News · 21,909
Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 23 September 2026
Печера Дракона
@dragonspech · 41,354
Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 31 August 2026
ГОЛОБУЦЬКИЙ
@allgolobutsky · 23,552
Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 22 September 2026
БРИГИНЕЦЬ🇺🇦
@bryhynets · 23,557
Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 17 September 2026
NUSS +
@nusspavlo · 21,106
Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 22 September 2026
Путч. Русский - нах*й
@putch111 · 32,320
Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 7 September 2026
Maxliner
@maxlineua · 19,370
Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 67 here — alongside 66 others — read 5 October 2026
Prozapas
@prozapas77 · 38,994
Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 31 August 2026
Європейська Солідарність
@officialeurosolidarity · 19,350
Telegram ranks this channel #42 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 1 October 2026
Україна переможе! 🇺🇦❤️
@porohobotchenko · 21,764
Telegram ranks this channel #44 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 23 September 2026
MYROTVORETS NEWS
@myrotvoretsnews · 24,220
Telegram ranks this channel #44 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 17 September 2026
ЗАКРИТА ЗОНА | Володимир АРʼЄВ
@zakrytazona · 42,954
Telegram ranks this channel #50 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 30 August 2026
🇺🇦 Софія Федина
@Sofiya_Fedyna · 23,559
Telegram ranks this channel #64 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 15 September 2026
Тарас Чорновіл 🇺🇦
@Chornovil_official · 45,997
Telegram ranks this channel #68 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 27 August 2026
Шалений Кіт
@Shaleniy_Kit · 22,623
Telegram ranks this channel #73 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 19 September 2026

This channel appears in 16 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Ігор Рейтерович | REITERS 🇺🇦” (@reiters), 11,806 subscribers as measured 10 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/reiters.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.