Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Червінський

Channel

Червінський

@RomanChervinskyi

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

14,708subscribers

+2,627 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002167366836
TypeChannel
Username@RomanChervinskyi
DescriptionНіхто не перекреслить мій народ! Пощезнуть всі перевертні й приблуди. І орди завойовників-заброд! В. Симоненко
Created22 August 2024 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 November 2026
Measurements held60
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 14 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/RomanChervinskyi

Topic

Politics & activism — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 72% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

12,08114,70813,394.58 August 2026 — 12,081 subscribers9 August 2026 — 12,088 subscribers10 August 2026 — 12,110 subscribers11 August 2026 — 12,122 subscribers12 August 2026 — 12,115 subscribers13 August 2026 — 12,118 subscribers14 August 2026 — 12,111 subscribers15 August 2026 — 12,157 subscribers17 August 2026 — 12,169 subscribers18 August 2026 — 12,237 subscribers20 August 2026 — 12,320 subscribers21 August 2026 — 12,465 subscribers23 August 2026 — 12,611 subscribers24 August 2026 — 12,758 subscribers25 August 2026 — 13,028 subscribers26 August 2026 — 13,133 subscribers27 August 2026 — 13,279 subscribers28 August 2026 — 13,393 subscribers29 August 2026 — 13,516 subscribers30 August 2026 — 13,665 subscribers31 August 2026 — 13,863 subscribers1 September 2026 — 13,939 subscribers3 September 2026 — 14,044 subscribers4 September 2026 — 14,109 subscribers6 September 2026 — 14,272 subscribers10 September 2026 — 14,334 subscribers12 September 2026 — 14,333 subscribers14 September 2026 — 14,338 subscribers17 September 2026 — 14,320 subscribers27 September 2026 — 14,113 subscribers5 October 2026 — 13,770 subscribers9 October 2026 — 13,816 subscribers13 October 2026 — 13,777 subscribers14 October 2026 — 13,762 subscribers15 October 2026 — 13,746 subscribers16 October 2026 — 13,729 subscribers17 October 2026 — 13,718 subscribers19 October 2026 — 13,754 subscribers20 October 2026 — 13,825 subscribers22 October 2026 — 13,849 subscribers23 October 2026 — 13,850 subscribers24 October 2026 — 13,860 subscribers25 October 2026 — 13,894 subscribers26 October 2026 — 13,939 subscribers27 October 2026 — 13,937 subscribers28 October 2026 — 13,963 subscribers29 October 2026 — 13,967 subscribers30 October 2026 — 13,983 subscribers31 October 2026 — 14,023 subscribers1 November 2026 — 14,067 subscribers2 November 2026 — 14,081 subscribers3 November 2026 — 14,239 subscribers4 November 2026 — 14,265 subscribers5 November 2026 — 14,369 subscribers6 November 2026 — 14,453 subscribers7 November 2026 — 14,549 subscribers8 November 2026 — 14,581 subscribers9 November 2026 — 14,670 subscribers11 November 2026 — 14,611 subscribers14 November 2026 — 14,708 subscribers8 August 202614 November 2026
60 measurements spanning 98 days, net +2,627. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 11,687–15,102 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 60
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
14 Nov 2026, 10:1014,708+97
11 Nov 2026, 10:3614,611-59
9 Nov 2026, 17:1014,670+89
8 Nov 2026, 06:2614,581+32
7 Nov 2026, 03:2514,549+96
6 Nov 2026, 04:1614,453+84
5 Nov 2026, 06:4914,369+104
4 Nov 2026, 02:5914,265+26
3 Nov 2026, 03:3014,239+158
2 Nov 2026, 02:2714,081+14
1 Nov 2026, 01:5014,067+44
31 Oct 2026, 03:1814,023+40
30 Oct 2026, 00:4413,983+16
29 Oct 2026, 02:1013,967+4
28 Oct 2026, 00:4413,963+26
27 Oct 2026, 03:1113,937-2
26 Oct 2026, 03:5813,939+45
25 Oct 2026, 02:5113,894+34
24 Oct 2026, 05:1113,860+10
23 Oct 2026, 02:3713,850first reading

Engagement

49 posts held, back to 16 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 69 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
25.2%
avg views ÷ 14,708 subscribers
Avg views / post
3,710
21 posts measured
Reaction rate
12.4%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
21
of 49 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 14 November 2026
Posts held49 (16 July 2026 – 14 November 2026)
Views total77,870
Reactions total9,640
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken14 Nov 2026, 19:55 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
627
Videos
217
Links
509

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 14 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
15m 17s
Average length
3m 03s

Measured directly from 5 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

26,598 reactions across 49 posts, in 27 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 35.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍9,51335.8%
🙏4,52517.0%
💯4,20315.8%
❤3,10911.7%
🔥1,7836.70%
🤬1,2924.86%
🤝9173.45%
😢4421.66%
❤‍🔥4031.52%
🤯1450.545%
🤔1010.38%
🤪360.135%
👏320.12%
🫡290.109%
🥰140.053%
😨90.034%
🤮70.026%
🥴70.026%
⚡50.019%
😱50.019%
7 further kinds210.079%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 49 of the 49 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 26,598 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 49 most recent posts we hold, published 16 July 2026 to 14 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 21 posts held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

14 Nov 2026, 12:51 UTC≈1,270 views218 reactionsread 14 November 2026

Рекомендую свіжу розмову Яніни Соколової з полковником СБУ та розвідником Романом Червінським. Без прикрас про те, що відбувається всередині силової вертикалі під час війни: 🔸 «Плівки Карфаген» і «Хімпром»: як силовики, поліція та кримінальні авторитети роками працювали в одній зв'язці, і чому виправдання про «використання наркомережі проти Росії» виглядають абсурдно (1:36). 🔸 Хто в курсі: чи могли в Офісі президента…

👍191❤14🤝13

14 Nov 2026, 12:49 UTC≈1,350 views207 reactionsread 14 November 2026

Нещодавно відбулася надзвичайно цікава зустріч із журналісткою та дуже сміливою людиною — Iryna Sampan. Обговорили актуальні події сьогодення та згадали минуле, міцно пов’язане з початком війни на Донбасі ще у 2014 році. Дякую за розмову та тверезий погляд на речі. https://youtu.be/Vuq2Yghgyjg?si=0Ipr_sPg50jhtDMb

👍178❤21🤝6🥰1🫡1

13 Nov 2026, 14:01 UTC≈1,850 views357 reactionsread 14 November 2026

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wC8D-mPDdBo

👍239🤬69🤝26💯13🔥4🤮2🫡2😨2

13 Nov 2026, 13:59 UTC≈1,950 views387 reactionsread 14 November 2026

Sofiya Fedyna Андрій Йосипов Нарешті вперше за тривалий час Печерський райсуд Києва продовжив підготовче засідання у справі Романа Червінського за відсутності потерпілого й заслухав клопотання захисту. Сьогодні, 12 листопада, засідання почалося з 20-хвилинним запізненням. Рашад Караханли, який раніше фігурував у справі як Сарієв, та його представник, адвокат Андрій Мука, знову не підключилися до відеоконференції. У…

👍229🙏125🤝18❤6🤬6🔥1🫡1😨1

11 Nov 2026, 09:09 UTC≈3,000 views582 reactionsread 14 November 2026
Photo

Завтра, 12 листопада о 13:00, у Печерському районному суді Києва відбудеться чергове засідання у справі, сформованій СБУ ще у 2020 році стосовно Дмитра Штанька — людини, яка першою викрила системну корупцію Єрмака. Три роки тому розпочалося розслідування щодо мене в межах цієї ж справи. Наразі в суді все ще триває підготовче засідання, проте сторона захисту вже зібрала переконливі докази провокації та фальсифікацій з…

👍329🙏202🤝32❤15🔥2⚡1🥰1

9 Nov 2026, 19:18 UTC≈4,070 views520 reactionsread 14 November 2026

Вчора відбулася надзвичайно цікава зустріч із журналісткою та дуже сміливою людиною — Iryna Sampan. Обговорили актуальні події сьогодення та згадали минуле, міцно пов’язане з початком війни на Донбасі ще у 2014 році. Дякую за розмову та тверезий погляд на речі. https://youtu.be/Vuq2Yghgyjg?si=XXQ3_H_hVBWTsMr6

👍439🔥58🤝14💯6❤2🙏1

31 Oct 2026, 14:03 UTC≈5,620 views646 reactionsread 14 November 2026

Протягом місяця вони уникають розгляду наших законних вимог — судді скасували вже цілу низку засідань, очевидно, побоюючись глянути в очі тим, хто приходить на суди. Дякую всім, хто стежить за процесом встановлення справедливості! Буду радий бачити кожного, хто має час і бажання відвідати це судове засідання. #Правосуддя #ПечерськийСуд #ДБР #СБУ #СудоваРеформа #Справедливість #РоманЧервінський

🙏452🤝89💯64👍23❤7🤬6🔥2🥰2

31 Oct 2026, 14:03 UTC≈5,220 views503 reactionsread 14 November 2026
Photo

Чергова спроба розпочати провадження щодо фактів тиску з боку Голови Київського апеляційного суду та співробітників СБУ на суддів апеляційного суду у 2023 році під час розгляду питання про утримання мене під вартою! 2 листопада о 10:40 суддя Печерського районного суду міста Києва Соколов О.М. призначив засідання щодо відмови ДБР внести до ЄРДР інформацію про тиск на суддів апеляційного суду, яких у 2023 році залякува…

💯424❤50🤝13🥰4🔥3🤯3🙏3🤬2

28 Oct 2026, 09:58 UTC≈4,440 views215 reactionsread 14 November 2026

https://youtu.be/-Mj7gbZsGLk?si=e-4ePQDK9qAGAO1F

👍190🔥25

28 Oct 2026, 09:58 UTC≈4,290 views209 reactionsread 14 November 2026

https://youtu.be/05JdmdZDv1o?si=-HO1en-2fP6JfOqL

👍184🔥25

28 Oct 2026, 09:57 UTC≈4,490 views521 reactionsread 14 November 2026

✊ Дякую величезній групі підтримки, яка вчора прибула до суду! Ви спостерігаєте за цим абсурдом уже 3 роки і все розумієте. Я бачив, як тремтіли суддя та представники СБУ, коли в коридорах лунав наш Славень. Зачинені двері не завадять нам знати правду й перемогти! Суспільство все бачить. Попереду остаточна перемога. Фото Olena Dmitrenko

🔥299🙏153🤝33👍26❤5❤‍🔥5

28 Oct 2026, 09:57 UTC≈4,410 views450 reactionsread 14 November 2026
Photo

⚖️ Вчора в Шевченківському суді відбулося чергове засідання у справі про захист моєї честі та гідності. Цей процес ініційований на тлі безпідставних звинувачень з боку колишнього Голови СБУ Василя Малюка, який у квітні 2023 року публічно назвав мене «злочинцем, негідником та дезертиром». За понад три роки жодне з цих звинувачень так і не було підтверджено судом. Ми вимагаємо від СБУ офіційного спростування, адже офіц…

🔥238🙏151🤝30👍16💯10❤5

Showing the 12 most recent of 49 posts we hold for @RomanChervinskyi. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

ЗАКРИТА ЗОНА | Володимир АРʼЄВ
@zakrytazona · 42,986
Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 30 August 2026
🇺🇦 Софія Федина
@Sofiya_Fedyna · 23,559
Telegram ranks this channel #36 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 15 September 2026
Європейська Солідарність
@officialeurosolidarity · 19,351
Telegram ranks this channel #46 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 1 October 2026
Prozapas
@prozapas77 · 39,063
Telegram ranks this channel #50 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 31 August 2026
Шалений Кіт
@Shaleniy_Kit · 22,610
Telegram ranks this channel #54 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 19 September 2026
Печера Дракона
@dragonspech · 41,291
Telegram ranks this channel #58 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 31 August 2026
Будем всех бамбить!
@budem_bambit · 20,422
Telegram ranks this channel #60 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 21 September 2026
Тарас Чорновіл 🇺🇦
@Chornovil_official · 45,997
Telegram ranks this channel #60 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 27 August 2026
БРИГИНЕЦЬ🇺🇦
@bryhynets · 23,557
Telegram ranks this channel #66 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 17 September 2026
Дмитро Чекалкин
@dmitriy_chekalkyn · 45,676
Telegram ranks this channel #66 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 27 August 2026
Балакаємо українською MovaSpark
@speakinua · 30,114
Telegram ranks this channel #67 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 6 September 2026
Omelyan News
@Omelyan_News · 21,909
Telegram ranks this channel #69 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 23 September 2026
Березовий Джем
@bereza_jam · 20,728
Telegram ranks this channel #73 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 29 September 2026
NUSS +
@nusspavlo · 21,083
Telegram ranks this channel #73 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 22 September 2026
Україна переможе! 🇺🇦❤️
@porohobotchenko · 21,764
Telegram ranks this channel #74 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 23 September 2026
Путч. Русский - нах*й
@putch111 · 32,320
Telegram ranks this channel #79 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 7 September 2026

This channel appears in 16 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Червінський” (@RomanChervinskyi), 14,708 subscribers as measured 14 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/RomanChervinskyi.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.