Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for НОВИНИ ПРАВДИ: Мир Олешко

Channel

НОВИНИ ПРАВДИ: Мир Олешко

@novynypravdy

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

63,149subscribers

+538 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001063127999
TypeChannel
Username@novynypravdy
Created27 March 2017measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live16 August 2026
Measurements held11
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 16 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/novynypravdy

Growth

62,61163,19562,9036 August 2026 — 62,611 subscribers6 August 2026 — 62,611 subscribers7 August 2026 — 63,195 subscribers8 August 2026 — 63,178 subscribers9 August 2026 — 63,136 subscribers10 August 2026 — 63,089 subscribers11 August 2026 — 63,047 subscribers12 August 2026 — 63,009 subscribers13 August 2026 — 63,173 subscribers14 August 2026 — 63,160 subscribers16 August 2026 — 63,149 subscribers63,1496 August 202616 August 2026
11 measurements spanning 10 days, net +538. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 62,523–63,283 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
16 Aug 2026, 02:5363,149-11
14 Aug 2026, 16:1563,160-13
13 Aug 2026, 06:5463,173+164
12 Aug 2026, 03:1863,009-38
11 Aug 2026, 03:5663,047-42
10 Aug 2026, 07:0763,089-47
9 Aug 2026, 10:3163,136-42
8 Aug 2026, 07:5763,178-17
7 Aug 2026, 05:3163,195+584
6 Aug 2026, 06:1562,611no change
6 Aug 2026, 06:0862,611first reading

Engagement

211 posts held, back to 5 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 23 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
13.1%
avg views ÷ 63,149 subscribers
Avg views / post
8,250
211 posts measured
Reaction rate
4.65%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
211
of 211 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 15 August 2026
Posts held211 (5 August 202615 August 2026)
Views total1,741,460
Reactions total80,999
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken16 Aug 2026, 02:01 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
1h 10m
Average length
1m 05s

Measured directly from 65 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

75,189 reactions across 192 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 34.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
💯26,09034.7%
😁18,37124.4%
💩12,72216.9%
🤬9,19712.2%
👍4,1175.48%
1,7762.36%
😭1,5262.03%
🔥7611.01%
😱5330.709%
👎530.07%
🙏390.052%
🥰40.005%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 211 of the 211 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 80,999reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 211 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 15 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
63
across the posts below
Posts paid on
9
of 211 we hold a reading for · 4%
Most on one post
51
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @novynypravdy. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 211 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 5 August 2026 to 15 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

15 Aug 2026, 23:34 UTC≈2,750 views160 reactionsread 16 August 2026
Video

В нас концтабір є?

💯147🔥6😁6💩1

15 Aug 2026, 23:16 UTC≈3,070 views175 reactionsread 16 August 2026
Photo

Сподіваюсь портніков і ведучий еспресо не здадуть - стануть побратимами в Третій штурмовій.

😁118💯552

15 Aug 2026, 22:05 UTC≈4,200 views240 reactionsread 16 August 2026
Photo

Віталій, а чому ж не в Києві живете? Ви ж завжди жили в Києві. Зі Львову теж змиєтесь, коли бомбити будуть кожну ніч?

💩158💯41😁37🤬4

15 Aug 2026, 21:00 UTC≈4,720 views183 reactionsread 16 August 2026
Forwarded from @dmytrukartemPhoto

Начался очередной прогрев эскалации в сторону Минска! Говорящие свиные рыла 🐷 войны, эскалации и идеи полного уничтожения Украины в очередной раз прогревают тему ненависти по отношению к самой добрососедской стране - Беларуси. Минск является единственной настоящей площадкой диалога и возможного достижения мира в Украине. Так было раньше, так есть сейчас и, убежден, так будет в будущем! И все эти враги Украины пон

💯144💩24👍12👎3

15 Aug 2026, 18:44 UTC≈7,270 views235 reactionsread 16 August 2026
Photo

Чудове чорне почуття гумору, так?

😁195💩32💯53

15 Aug 2026, 18:40 UTC≈7,340 views397 reactionsread 16 August 2026
Video

Портніков захистив Зеленського, заявив що він не втік та не капітулював як справжній патріот. Каже, Зеленський захистив Україну - певно, особливо Маріуполь та Бахмут. Мільйони українців Портніков звинуватив в тому, що вони бажали у 2019 році капітуляції, тому голосували за Зеленського, хоча це брехня - за нього голосували, бо він обіцяв мир. Відробляє бронь.

💩306💯75🤬14👍2

15 Aug 2026, 18:23 UTC≈7,100 views241 reactionsread 16 August 2026
Video

Стерненко програв суд і має публічно принести вибачення.

🔥177😁603😱1

15 Aug 2026, 18:03 UTC≈7,440 views263 reactionsread 16 August 2026
Video

Українці втекли з України не концтабору в концтабір Грузію, шляхом якої ми не маємо йти, як каже підріла Портніков.

👍232👎1510💯6

15 Aug 2026, 17:55 UTC≈6,550 views208 reactionsread 16 August 2026
Forwarded from @RostyslavSPhoto

Борислав Береза в 2026-м

😁197💯82😭1

15 Aug 2026, 17:49 UTC≈6,920 views223 reactionsread 16 August 2026
Photo

Перегляди впали. Борислав, твої «російські куратори більше грошей не дадуть», як ти сам любив говорити.

😁211💯11🤬1

15 Aug 2026, 17:47 UTC≈6,190 views193 reactionsread 16 August 2026
Forwarded from @RostyslavSPhoto

Борислав Береза на 4-м году "демократии" искренно удивился, что его канал ютуба заблокировали в Украине и ЦПД написал что он "ворожый пропагандист". Остальные украинские блогеры которые критиковали зелебобу и которым заблокировали каналы в 2024-2025: "Ну да..ну да". и пошли себе дальше заниматься своими делами

💯130😁574🤬2

15 Aug 2026, 17:25 UTC≈6,560 views333 reactionsread 16 August 2026
Photo

Акторка Кузнєцова публікує розповіді своїх фанатів, рідних яких вбили окупанти ТЦК режиму Зеленського.

😱229👍64🔥21😭19

Showing the 12 most recent of 211 posts we hold for @novynypravdy. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts edited after publishing

@novynypravdy edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
14 August 2026
Most recent edit
14 August 2026

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 60,376 of 1,481,217entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 13 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Сергій Ягодзінський
@Sophist_UA · 209,712
Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 11 August 2026
George Ivensiya
@georgeivensiya · 101,282
Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 15 August 2026
➕Ігор Мосійчук 🦏
@mosiychuk72 · 508,050
Telegram ranks this channel #32 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 10 August 2026
Dubinsky.pro
@dubinskypro · 156,488
Telegram ranks this channel #39 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 12 August 2026
Тарас Юрист Адвокат Одесса
@TarasOdessa · 144,615
Telegram ranks this channel #44 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 13 August 2026
Gura Anton
@guraanton · 267,239
Telegram ranks this channel #76 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 10 August 2026

This channel appears in 6 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“НОВИНИ ПРАВДИ: Мир Олешко” (@novynypravdy), 63,149 subscribers as measured 16 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/novynypravdy.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.