National news — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 57% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
36 measurements spanning 50 days, net -3,236. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 110,930–116,053 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 36
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
25 Sept 2026, 08:58
111,638
+117
19 Sept 2026, 01:57
111,521
-1,229
16 Sept 2026, 14:41
112,750
-20
14 Sept 2026, 18:01
112,770
-375
13 Sept 2026, 02:17
113,145
-131
11 Sept 2026, 03:21
113,276
-942
8 Sept 2026, 07:39
114,218
+306
5 Sept 2026, 03:57
113,912
-32
3 Sept 2026, 13:01
113,944
-74
2 Sept 2026, 03:24
114,018
-45
1 Sept 2026, 03:26
114,063
-52
31 Aug 2026, 05:46
114,115
-48
30 Aug 2026, 03:25
114,163
+30
29 Aug 2026, 04:55
114,133
-11
28 Aug 2026, 04:55
114,144
-44
27 Aug 2026, 01:25
114,188
-42
25 Aug 2026, 22:56
114,230
-32
24 Aug 2026, 20:27
114,262
-143
23 Aug 2026, 04:37
114,405
-72
21 Aug 2026, 13:12
114,477
first reading
Engagement
609 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 107 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
9.88%
avg views ÷ 111,638 subscribers
Avg views / post
11,000
337 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.42%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
338
of 609 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 26 September 2026
Posts held
609 (5 August 2026 – 26 September 2026)
Views total
3,718,650
Reactions total
90,017
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
26 Sept 2026, 23:27 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈13,200
Videos
≈8,200
Links
≈11,000
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 26 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
7h 17m
Average length
1m 49s
Measured directly from 240 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
170,668 reactions across 601 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 31.3% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
👍
53,385
31.3%
🔥
34,020
19.9%
🙏
29,330
17.2%
🤬
23,795
13.9%
😁
12,136
7.11%
❤
9,739
5.71%
🤔
4,180
2.45%
😱
1,632
0.956%
👎
1,197
0.701%
🥰
1,089
0.638%
❤🔥
165
0.097%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 608 of the 609 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 173,058 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 609 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 26 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
313
across the posts below
Posts paid on
28
of 608 we hold a reading for · 5%
Most on one post
50
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @beard_tim. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 609 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 5 August 2026 to 26 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Advertising
Ad load
0.164%
1 of 609 posts carry an ad marker
Regulatory tokens
1
posts carrying an erid · 1 distinct token
Median views · ads
13,200
over 1 measured post
Median views · rest
10,700
over 607 measured posts
An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.
This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor. A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.
Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.
Advertising tokens recorded on this entry
erid
Posts
First seen
Last seen
2VtzqwKzjvs
1
11 August 2026
11 August 2026
A token repeated across several posts is one advertising contract placed more than once, which is what the identifier is for. The strings are reproduced exactly as they appeared in the post or in its click-through URL and are not validated against any registry — we record the marker a channel published, and whether it resolves to a real contract is a question for the register that issued it.
Measured over the 609 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 26 September 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.
Вижу, что многие читающие сводки с фронта испытывают острое недоумение - как укропы могу проводить контратаки единомоментно почти по всей линии фронта от Орехова до Купянска. Причем даже добиваясь успехов оперативного уровня как под Красным Лиманом.
Хочу привести один исторический пример. Это именно пример, а не историческая аналогия, которая всегда ложная. Аналогия ставит равно между ситуациями, что неверно. Пример…
👍Расчёт БПЛА Южной группировки войск в Краматорске обнаружил и уничтожил САУ M109 «Paladin» ВСУ.
📲Южный Рубеж в MAX ✉️Написать админу в MAX 📱Южный рубеж 💬ЧАТ ✉️Написать админу в Телеграм
🇷🇺 Вступай в корпус ПВО «Сталинских Соколов» и защищай стратегические объекты!
Мы предлагаем:
🔻Удобный график: 2 дня работаешь, 2 дня отдыхаешь (cмены по 12 часов);
🔻Работа с высокими технологиям.
Карьерный трек:
🔻513 000 руб на руки — Младший специалист МОГ / Техник FPV;
🔻565 000 руб на руки — Специалист МОГ / Пилот FPV;
🔻617 000 руб на руки — Ведущий специалист МОГ / Ответственный за пост FPV;
🔻665 000 руб на рук…
Отдельно прекрасно, что кровавые коммунисты делали плохо буквально всё, кроме границ республик. Они их чертили руками бога.
Границы вообще были банальной формальностью ввиду отсутствия таможенного контроля.
https://t.me/expensive_hurma/36352
‼️Письмо в «Народную Сеть»:
Уважаемые товарищи!
По прошествии этих не многих, но долгих лет с начала СВО, в нашем волонтерском маскировочном сообществе наблюдается если не застой, то тихая рутинизация.
Причин этому бесконечно много. Нас стало гораздо меньше, сборы упали, а некоторые вообще перестали видеть смысл в своих действиях.
Однако сейчас я хочу обратиться к Вам, тем последним, на ком реально держится снабж…
🙌Волонтёрский дневник нашего отделения в московских Сокольниках:
Сегодня припозднилась. Наши уже плели вовсю, доплетали.
В соседней комнате - уже готовые свернутые и упакованные, готовые к отдаче ребятам из подразделений, откуда прибыли заявки.
Приезжают, забирают, лично в руки отдаём.
"Отдаём", "плетём".. Как приятно снова, после долгой летней паузы, произносить эти глаголы в этой фоме. Чувствовать себя снова ча…
Я восемь лет трудясь редактором в политических ток-шоу всё силился понять до конца: зачем нам на российском телевидении не только транслировали все возможные цитаты русофобов мира, а также на какого Хуана нам нужны были привозные укропы из числа евромайдаунов вроде Славы Ковтуна, Трухана, Гайдука и прочих? Причем на нихеровые гонорары минимум по 20.000 за эфир, с билетами и проживанием.
А потом вдруг в интернете как…
⚡️Почему на наших некоторых Фед.каналах Зеленского цитируют больше, чем сами каналы противника?
— для чего на этом постоянно акцентировать внимание, давая хриплому очередной хайп?
Фронтовая птичка в TG
Фронтовая птичка в MAX
🆘 Ребята, не в ущерб себе, кому не сложно, помогите приюту с хвостатыми питомцами. 🙏
❗У приюта огромные долги за корм!
Аккаунт приюта: @serdce_druga
🐾 Реквизиты для помощи с пометкой «благотворительность» :
8-999-782-90-26
2202208819325813 (Сбер)
5536913963142290 (Т-Банк)
2200152912479303 (Альфа)
2200240415749338 (ВТБ)
Дарья Павловна Т
Период выборов очень похож на своего рода дождь, правда на головы и в уши электората льется совсем не вода, а после «дождя» выползают разнообразные кольчатые беспозвоночные создания отечественной телеги, которые не прочь за мелкий прайс поковыряться в разной плотности коричневой субстанции.
В природе это объясняется тем, что
после дождя червям ползти намного легче и быстрее. Это помогает им переселяться на новые уча…
🔹В период с 19 по 25 сентября подразделения «Южной» группировки улучшили положение по переднему краю.
❗️Кроме того, нанесено поражение живой силе и технике во всей зоне ответственности «Южной» группировки войск. Всего ВСУ потеряли 1340 военнослужащих, три танка, в том числе немецкий танк «Leopard» производства ФРГ, 10 боевых бронированных машин, 148 автомобилей и 20 орудий полевой артиллерии.
📲Южный Рубеж в MAX ✉️…
❤79👍43🔥20🙏6🤔3
Showing the 12 most recent of 609 posts we hold for @beard_tim. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@beard_tim edited 2 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
27 August 2026
Most recent edit
15 September 2026
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republished by 70 registered channels. The 48 listed are the ones that have forwarded the most posts; the rest are counted here but not each listed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 74 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
Dead references
2
handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
Evidenced gone
1
we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
Never seen alive
1
vacant every time we have ever looked
@beard_tim named 2 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Evidenced gone
We ourselves saw each of these resolve to a real page at some point before it went vacant — a genuine, evidenced change, not an inference from absence.
@dead_ykrop named in 1 post, 16 August 2026 – 16 August 2026 · confirmed gone 3 September 2026 (two independent sightings — see how we confirm a dead handle)evidenced
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
@oldmimerkomi named in 3 posts, 9 August 2026 – 11 August 2026
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 14 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Передовая Культура @peredovaya_culture · 30,666 Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 7 September 2026
Фоточки #МОНТЯН! @montyanphotos · 31,033 Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 6 September 2026
Пролив Сталина @prolivstalina · 40,766 Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 30 August 2026
Borisenko Dmitriy @borisenkoD · 111,854 Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 14 August 2026
Ловец Человеков: МЕЖДУ МИРОМ И ВОЙНОЙ @iamhumancatcher · 128,383 Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 13 August 2026
РОГОЗИН @rogozin_do · 91,667 Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 17 August 2026
Анатолий Радов @motopatriot78 · 37,114 Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 1 September 2026
Отряд Ковпака @otryadkovpaka · 141,342 Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 13 August 2026
Весёлый Душнила @dushnilio · 43,042 Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 28 August 2026
Z 105-й полк НМ ДНР: сводки с ЛБС и не только. @polk105 · 26,568 Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 12 September 2026
РУССКИЙ ПАТРИОТ @russianpatriotvzo · 43,912 Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 28 August 2026
Лина Булатникова🤍 Помощь фронту💙Дроны "Мурз"❤️Стримы @reihatori · 24,417 Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 15 September 2026
Харьковское направление @XNRRussia · 25,274 Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 14 September 2026
Военные Сводки - Чё там в мире? @military_zB · 93,430 Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 17 August 2026
Лохматый Z Николаев, Сергей Лебедев @L0HMATIY · 35,199 Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 13 September 2026
Военкор Астрахань @astrahandm · 28,088 Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 10 September 2026
Собственный корреспондент @zovgrad · 128,138 Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 13 August 2026
Охотники за головами @heads_hunters · 30,073 Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 7 September 2026
🇷🇺 DONTSTOPWAR @dontstopwar · 249,958 Telegram ranks this channel #31 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 10 August 2026
ZАПИСКИ VЕТЕРАНА 🇷🇺 @notes_veterans · 276,927 Telegram ranks this channel #31 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 10 August 2026
Артёмовск @rus_bakhmut · 28,704 Telegram ranks this channel #32 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 9 September 2026
Фронтовая птичка @frontbird · 117,799 Telegram ranks this channel #32 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 14 August 2026
Z кейс @crituk · 85,333 Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 15 August 2026
ПриZрак Новороссии @ghost_of_novorossia · 141,584 Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 13 August 2026
This channel appears in 86 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 25 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Синяя Z Борода” (@beard_tim), 111,638 subscribers as measured 25 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/beard_tim.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
