Local community — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 8 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 83% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
7 measurements spanning 6 days, net -38. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 239,803–239,882 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
12 Aug 2026, 04:42
239,812
-5
11 Aug 2026, 07:53
239,817
+4
10 Aug 2026, 09:05
239,813
-26
9 Aug 2026, 05:51
239,839
-26
8 Aug 2026, 03:11
239,865
-8
7 Aug 2026, 00:50
239,873
+23
6 Aug 2026, 01:33
239,850
first reading
Engagement
7 posts held, back to 20 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 17 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
26.5%
avg views ÷ 239,812 subscribers
Avg views / post
63,600
7 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.239%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
7
of 7 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026
Posts held
7 (20 July 2026 – 7 August 2026)
Views total
445,100
Reactions total
1,064
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
12 Aug 2026, 17:55 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈1,900
Videos
≈90
Links
≈1,640
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
18s
Average length
6s
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
1,064 reactions across 7 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 71.1% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
👍
756
71.1%
🤔
127
11.9%
🔥
78
7.33%
😱
60
5.64%
🤩
43
4.04%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 7 of the 7 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,064reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 7 most recent posts we hold, published 20 July 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
📦Beware of phishing scams that impersonate courier companies via iMessage!
Since 24 June 2026, at least 251 cases have been reported, with victims losing over $1.2 million.
⚠️ Courier companies typically do not use iMessage to contact customers.
Protect yourself
✅ Verify delivery notifications through official sources
✅ Do not click on links in unsolicited messages
✅ Turn on "Filter Unknown Senders" and "Filter S…
Finding government information is now easier! Chat.gov.sg (Beta) provides simple answers about government services in all 4 official languages.
Try chat.gov.sg today! 😊
Brought to you by: ServiceSG and GovTech
We will provide additional support to Singaporeans to help manage the impact of the ongoing Middle East situation.
💙 Additional U-Save rebates in Oct 2026 and Jan 2027
💙 $300 CDC Vouchers per Singaporean household in Jan 2027
🔍 Find out more at singaporebudget.gov.sg
The Government has announced a second support package of around $900 million for Singaporean households and local businesses in response to the ongoing Middle East situation.
See above for an overview of this package 🔼
🔍 Find out more at go.gov.sg/secondsupportpackage
From online trends to new apps, your teen’s online world is constantly expanding. Not sure how to keep up? Explore our Parenting Booster Pack for tips on navigating the online world together and guiding your teen every step of the way.
➡️ Check out more tips at bescreensmart.gov.sg
#ScreenSmartSG #GrowWellSG
How much screen time is okay? With games, videos and schoolwork, it adds up fast but finding the right balance goes a long way. Find practical tips in our Parenting Booster Pack to help kids aged 7-12 build healthy digital habits.
➡️ Check out more tips at bescreensmart.gov.sg
#ScreenSmartSG #GrowWellSG
To every parent doing their best to balance screen time for kids, this one’s for you. Starting early with consistent boundaries can help build healthy habits.
Explore our Parenting Booster Pack for simple, practical tips for little ones aged 0-6.
➡️ Check out more tips at bescreensmart.gov.sg
#ScreenSmartSG #GrowWellSG
👍112🤔14😱7🔥1🤩1
Showing the 7 most recent of 7 posts we hold for @Govsg. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 145,159 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Mentions
Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s.When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 11 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Mothership @mothershipsg · 247,363 Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 35 here — alongside 34 others — read 11 August 2026
CNA @cnalatest · 225,435 Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 55 here — alongside 54 others — read 11 August 2026
The Straits Times @TheStraitsTimes · 269,076 Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 47 here — alongside 46 others — read 11 August 2026
Bloomberg @bloomberg · 166,884 Telegram ranks this channel #32 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 12 August 2026
This channel appears in 4 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cross-platform identity — Wikidata
A Wikidata item names this Telegram handle as belonging to the entity it describes. This is Wikidata’s claim, not a verification made by this register — nobody here confirmed that the account is genuinely operated by the entity named. Wikidata content is CC0; every fact below is dated to when it was read from Wikidata, not to when the association was first made there.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“gov.sg” (@Govsg), 239,812 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Govsg.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
