我IG終於可以開broadcast channel,分享所有飛行tips。 Channel會呢一兩個星期開group 如果有家有興趣就join啦, 唔明有問題就直接DM我啦
👍26❤13

Channel
@myflightlog
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
838subscribers
-6 since we began measuring on 28 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001904591897 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @myflightlog |
| Created | Between 1 March 2023 and 31 January 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 28 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 15 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 15 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/myflightlog |
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 19 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 38% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 15 Sept 2026, 08:19 | 838 | -4 |
| 7 Sept 2026, 16:18 | 842 | -2 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 10:00 | 844 | no change |
| 28 Aug 2026, 09:45 | 844 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 2 April 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 20 August 2024. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
950 reactions across 18 posts, in 15 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 64.5% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 613 | 64.5% | |
| 👍 | 215 | 22.6% | |
| 🔥 | 57 | 6.00% | |
| 🥰 | 13 | 1.37% | |
| 🎉 | 9 | 0.947% | |
| 💯 | 7 | 0.737% | |
| 😍 | 6 | 0.632% | |
| 😴 | 6 | 0.632% | |
| 🍾 | 5 | 0.526% | |
| 👏 | 5 | 0.526% | |
| 🤩 | 5 | 0.526% | |
| 👀 | 4 | 0.421% | |
| 🌭 | 3 | 0.316% | |
| 💋 | 1 | 0.105% | |
| 🤔 | 1 | 0.105% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 950 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 2 April 2024 to 20 August 2024, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
我IG終於可以開broadcast channel,分享所有飛行tips。 Channel會呢一兩個星期開group 如果有家有興趣就join啦, 唔明有問題就直接DM我啦
👍26❤13
Sorry 好耐冇係到update岩岩係IG 出咗一段reel 關於cadet interview 有興趣嘅朋友就睇吓啦 🙌🏻
👍22❤20
之前收到一啲朋友仔DM同email,同我講就嚟要考ICAO. 但係我喺ICAO已經係好多年前嘅事. 以前嘅考試方式係面對面,但係近期佢哋轉咗用電話📞不過我唔知最近有冇改返。Anyway, 以下係一d有關考試嘅資料。仲有一個少少貼士俾大家🧠 就係呢個考試佢係考你嘅英文🗣️唔係你嘅飛行知識。所以你如果唔識答條問題,我會建議你都keep住係咁講英文。例如講I don’t know都有長氣少少。 例如 Example. Sorry I don’t know the answer, but if you let me guess, I think it’s because …..……… 希望幫到大家,如果你知道有啲近近期嘅資訊,你都可以矯正我。然之後我再update翻 Test Format http://tasman-media.aspeqexams.com/Samples/KAIR610%20-%20FLE%20Sample…
❤31🔥3👍2
一般機場跑道的方向是根據地理環境、航空管理️同埋噪音問題💥等多種考慮因素,但最重要的係睇風向✈️ 起飛同降落通常避免順著風 (tailwind)向進行,相反地,逆風(headwind)情況可能會有更多好處,也更安全✅
❤32🥰3👍2👏1🔥1
有啲朋友問我讀咩書同科目對成為cadet有冇影響呢?我自己讀數學嘅,所以有啲幫手。不過實際上,飛行方面嘅數學問題一般都係基本嘅加減乘除,唔會太複雜嘅。再講返之前嘅問題,其實讀咩科目對投考cadet嘅影響唔大。最緊要嘅係你喺interview時展現出對飛行嘅熱誠💙 分享一個例子 我有個同學讀酒店管理🏨呢科目同飛行冇太大關連。但係佢喺面試時表現出對旅行嘅熱愛,之後機緣巧合底下佢第一次接觸到飛行。之後佢就決定投考做飛機師👨🏻✈️👩🏻✈️
❤42👍3👏3🥰3
書本今日已經全部寄出 📕 如果嚟緊有啲乜嘢嘢可以再分享俾大家,我會喺呢度發佈 🙌🏻🙌🏻
👍13❤10
麻煩之前我應承咗會寄本書俾你哋嘅朋友,可唔可以再DM你哋嘅電話地址同名俾我👍🏼
❤13👍1
有幾個大aviation topic係Technical interview 都會想問到。POF (principle of flying) 啫係㗎飛機點飛, Meteorology “天文學”, aircraft system (例如, engine, flight control, cockpit instrument)。📚 一般來講如果冇飛行經驗,我本人覺得準備到PPL level (private pilot license) 到就足夠for interview. 但係如果你本身有牌,咁樣好大機會問番你相對應有嘅水平tech問題。 最後有一個小小tips, 就係嘗試用一個lead and feed 嘅approach。就係當你答一題問題嘅時候,去領導下一條問題。(例如: 問 : 有乜嘢天文現象會影響飛行啊? 答: 風,雲。咁呢雲就有兩大類💡⤵️ 對面條友就好大機會問”咁雲有邊兩大類呀?”類似係咁🤣) 最後希大家體諒,我未…
👍34❤18🔥6
如果準備有 cadet 面試嘅朋友們🤝,我可以分享一下當年我同其他朋友係點樣準備。 首先要好好閱讀公司嘅資料。例如佢地有嘅航線、機種、公司規模及管理層。 第二就係 cadet 訓練課程流程。訓練學校地點/機場、課程大綱、飛機型號。 當你畢業之後,公司人工福利、晉升流程及時間。 以上所有都可以衍生一些 challenge 或者問題。(例如:畢業之後你會經常飛長途機 (long haul),所以你時常會遇到時差問題,到時你會怎樣應對?) 最後有一個小小提議,就是面試嘅時候唔好講大話。如果遇到有啲問題唔知就實話實說,唔好吹水。
❤57👍11😍5💯2
除咗飛行上嘅困難之外,另外一個經常遇到嘅challenge就係jet lag😴 如果我嘅layover 短過24個鐘,我都會跟返body clock 時間。如果較長嘅stay, 就只可以硬食 🫠
❤32😴6🔥5👍1💋1🤔1
一般民航飛機個PFD (Primary Flight Display) 嘅Layout都會係咁樣。 唔同機種可能會有少少唔同,不過都係大同小異🖥️
🔥32❤14👍6👀4
MyFlightbook✈️📚 (中文台) pinned a photo
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @myflightlog. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
大家會對咩有興趣?✈️
The shares total 173%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 2 April 2024 to 20 August 2024. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“MyFlightbook✈️📚 (中文台)” (@myflightlog), 838 subscribers as measured 15 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/myflightlog.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.