9 May 2026, 14:16 UTC734 views3 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @twitter_translatePhoto
这个世界上有两种人： 1. “我受过苦，所以你们也得受苦才公平。” 2. “我受过苦，所以我会竭尽所能让别人不再受我这份苦。” source
❤3
Channel
男性解放 Men's Liberation
@mens_liberation
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
882subscribers
+3 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001579438288 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @mens_liberation |
| Created | Between 1 August 2021 and 28 February 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 14 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/mens_liberation |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 14 Aug 2026, 13:54 | 882 | +2 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 12:20 | 880 | +1 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 20:46 | 879 | first reading |
Engagement
13 posts held, back to 6 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 13 posts for this entry, the most recent from 9 May 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Reaction mix
3 reactions across 1 post, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 3 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 3 of the 13 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 3reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 13 most recent posts we hold, published 6 May 2026 to 9 May 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
9 May 2026, 09:14 UTC723 viewsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @twitter_translatePhoto
每天散步，比去买了健身房的年卡但因为讨厌健身房的那种锻炼而根本不去，要健康得多。 吃速冻食品，比因为太累没精力自己做饭而根本不吃饭，要健康得多。 快速冲个澡，比因为精心设计的清洁步骤太过复杂而拖延好几天，要健康得多。 设置合理的目标很重要。如果我们的目标定得太高，最后我们可能会因为做不到那个目标而干脆什么都不做。 source
8 May 2026, 16:56 UTC573 viewsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @twitter_translatePhoto
是的，交流很重要。但如果在一段感情当中，你需要把每件事情都一再地细致入微地交流，对方才能了解和尊重你的需求，那这种交流模式很可能会给你带来巨大的情感和精力上消耗，甚至让你无法再爱对方。 爱情和亲密关系中很重要的一点是，你需要感受到对方的理解和关心。能够认识到你做各种事情背后的逻辑，以及一定程度上根据你的愿望/需求/感受主动为你做一些事情，这些都是爱的表现。相反，完全无法认识到你做各种事情背后的逻辑，也无法考虑到你的愿望/需求/感受，而是需要你来反复讲述你内心所想的所有细节并安排好你希望对方做的所有事情，很容易让你感觉在这段感情里，对方并不真正认识你，也并不真正爱你。 当然，对方不能读出你所有的心思，你需要和对方更坦诚地交流自己的所思所想。这很有道理。但如果对方连你最基本的一些想法都不能理解，也不会为你的快乐和幸福主动做任何考虑，那这个人真的不是一个很合适的伴侣。 source
8 May 2026, 11:51 UTC386 views0 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo
“学习如何接受无聊”对有注意力障碍（ADHD）的人来说非常重要。虽然你失调的多巴胺系统可能不是这么想的，但事实是，生活不仅仅只有精彩的那些部分。你得教会你的大脑接受无聊，让无聊的任务不再感觉像一种折磨。通过让自己感到无聊，你的大脑会慢慢意识到，把所有事情归为“无聊”和“不怎么无聊”并不是正确的分类方法。慢慢地，你会感觉到真正的“精彩”，而不仅仅是“不怎么无聊”。 去触摸花草。去听听你住所附近的各种声音。让你身体的感官接触自然，不仅能降低焦虑，而且能获得一种“我在真实生活”的感觉。 source
8 May 2026, 06:46 UTC259 viewsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @twitter_translatePhoto
了解生活的最好方式，是去热爱世间诸多的美好事物。 source
8 May 2026, 01:40 UTC246 viewsread 6 August 2026
Photo
甲：“听从身体的感受”，这事儿对我来说最大的问题就是，我的身体一直跟我说，现在该做的事就是舒舒服服地躺在床上😂 乙：除了，你知道的，真的该躺在床上睡觉的时候 source
7 May 2026, 20:34 UTC220 viewsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @twitter_translatePhoto
很多人喜欢把“聪明”看成某种与生俱来的特质，我认为这种想法不对而且很有害。 “聪明”的本质，其实是学习的机会和考察不同视角的意愿。我们不应该把知识看作只有天生“聪明”的人才能拥有的神秘事物。因为获取知识的能力，也就是我们常常说的“聪明”，是任何人都可以自我培养的技能。 source
7 May 2026, 15:28 UTC192 viewsread 6 August 2026
Photo
人在自然状况下就是会无意识地被周遭的动静和变化吸引的。下次您穿过人群或者上课迟到或者任何被很多人看着的时候，您可以提醒自己，这些人只是受习惯和天性的驱使不自觉地看你，并不是有意盯着你，也不是对你有所不满或者觉得你做错了任何事情。 source
7 May 2026, 10:22 UTC179 views0 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @twitter_translatePhoto
是的 踏出新的一步会让人害怕 但想象一下 如果你一年后还是留在原地 这样的光阴虚度不会让你害怕吗 source
7 May 2026, 05:15 UTC196 viewsread 6 August 2026
Photo
有些人觉得自己正在努力走出过去的创伤，但实际上却只是一味回避所有能联想到过去创伤的人和事情，让自己陷入孤独之中。 这是一种通过回避来应对创伤的方式，这种应对方式并不能让人完全走出创伤。而想要真正走出创伤，我们必须去建立能改变过去的创伤反应的新情感联结和新人际关系。 当同样的情形下，我们一次次遇到和早先创伤时期不同的对待，我们的情绪反应系统也会慢慢开始改变。 有人没有选择抛弃我们，而是选择来寻找我们的时候；有人没有选择无视我们，而是选择努力理解我们的感受的时候 —— 我们的神经系统会发生变化，我们下意识里对世界认知也会开始重新书写。 source
7 May 2026, 00:06 UTC127 viewsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @twitter_translatePhoto
“我浪费了那些年” —— 朋友，那些年里你可能根本就没有别的选择。 在当时的客观条件和所知信息下，你已经努力做到了最好。过去不能改变，让我们专注当下和将来吧。 source
6 May 2026, 18:56 UTC120 viewsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @twitter_translatePhoto
在遇到种族歧视、性别歧视、性向歧视等问题的时候，我发现“我不想成为这样的人”是比“我不是这样的人”更好的态度。 比如，在有人指出“这个事情是对身心障碍的人的偏见”的时候，比起立即针锋相对表明“我对有身心障碍的人怎么可能有偏见”，也许更好的做法是提醒自己“我不想对身心障碍的人心存偏见所以我得仔细想想刚才的说法和做法究竟有没有问题”。 也就是说，比起急于维护自己的形象，我们更该做的是审视我们是否违背了我们平等待人的本意、是否忽略了重要的信息、是否忽视了别人的需求、以及是否在错误的认知之下做出了伤害别人的事情。 source
Showing the 12 most recent of 13 posts we hold for @mens_liberation. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 1,172,889 of 1,548,671entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“男性解放 Men's Liberation” (@mens_liberation), 882 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/mens_liberation.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.