26 May 2025, 16:02 UTC921 viewsread 7 August 2026
今日係527，係反惡歌法二讀五週年嘅日子。 五年前嘅527手足，個個都食哂pepper lunch，付出眾多，希望大家唔好忘記當日手足嘅付出
Channel
5.27 反對惡歌法及國安惡法 資訊台
@AntiAnthemLawChannel
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
2,367subscribers
-9 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001407433381 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @AntiAnthemLawChannel |
| Created | 17 May 2020 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 13 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/AntiAnthemLawChannel |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 13 Aug 2026, 15:07 | 2,367 | -6 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 12:31 | 2,373 | -3 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 06:02 | 2,376 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 09:34 | 2,376 | first reading |
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 13 January 2022 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 26 May 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Recent posts
27 May 2024, 11:00 UTC≈1,460 viewsread 7 August 2026
今日係527，係反惡歌法二讀四週年嘅日子。 四年前嘅527手足，個個都食哂pepper lunch，付出眾多，希望大家唔好忘記當日手足嘅付出
27 May 2023, 09:09 UTCviews —
5.27 反對惡歌法及國安惡法 資訊台 pinned «今日係527，係反惡歌法二讀三週年嘅日子。 三年前嘅527手足，個個都食哂pepper lunch，付出眾多，希望大家唔好忘記當日手足嘅付出»
27 May 2023, 09:07 UTC≈4,020 viewsread 7 August 2026
今日係527，係反惡歌法二讀三週年嘅日子。 三年前嘅527手足，個個都食哂pepper lunch，付出眾多，希望大家唔好忘記當日手足嘅付出
27 May 2022, 10:18 UTCviews —
5.27 反對惡歌法及國安惡法 資訊台 pinned «今日係527，係反惡歌法二讀兩週年嘅日子。 希望大家唔好忘記喺兩年前527手足付出眾多，例如個個都食pepper lunch. 喺呢年，大家都無懼惡歌法，例如726 apm噓惡歌活動。»
27 May 2022, 10:18 UTC≈17,700 viewsread 7 August 2026
今日係527，係反惡歌法二讀兩週年嘅日子。 希望大家唔好忘記喺兩年前527手足付出眾多，例如個個都食pepper lunch. 喺呢年，大家都無懼惡歌法，例如726 apm噓惡歌活動。
18 Feb 2022, 06:48 UTC≈3,640 viewsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @inmediahknetPhoto
監獄率先推「全民檢測」鎖倉10日 料大批案件需押後 https://bit.ly/3p0iwur
15 Feb 2022, 13:00 UTC≈2,190 viewsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @hkindepenAsso2
沙田區議會主席麥潤培預告利安邨利盛樓圍封行動 警接市民報案 交新界南重案組跟進 https://lih.kg/2887156 - 分享自 LIHKG 討論區
12 Feb 2022, 10:15 UTC≈1,700 viewsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @youarenotalonehkPhoto
#補相 #大圍 大概1600 #新翠邨 檢測站 1名男子懷疑焚燒物品被捕 🛑求資訊🛑求詳情🛑
9 Feb 2022, 14:08 UTC≈1,430 viewsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @YTM1G
【12名忠誠勇毅及2名文職人員初步確診 警方公布，有12名警員及2名文職人員初步確診武漢肺炎，年齡介乎26至53歲，分別駐守警察總部、觀塘警區、中區警區、中央交通違例檢控組、西區分區、深水埗分區、落馬洲分區、水警西分區及警察體育遊樂會。 他們較早前獲安排接受病毒檢測， 分別於2月8日及9日初步證實對武漢肺炎呈陽性反應。他們於過去14日均沒有外遊記錄，工作期間有佩戴口罩，最後上班日期分別為1月28日至2月8日。
7 Feb 2022, 02:49 UTC≈1,320 viewsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @YTM1G
【最新】消息：本港新增逾600宗新冠病毒確診 https://news.now.com/urgentnews.jsp?taskId=26491&refer=Share
5 Feb 2022, 03:57 UTC≈1,250 viewsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @YTM1G
消息：今增350確診個案 創兩年以來新高
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @AntiAnthemLawChannel. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 458,026 of 1,480,688entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“5.27 反對惡歌法及國安惡法 資訊台” (@AntiAnthemLawChannel), 2,367 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/AntiAnthemLawChannel.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.