π Daily candle closed β #BTCUSDT β’β’β’ π·οΈ Price 63,602 π’ 24h -0.57% Vol 823.9M β¬οΈ High 64,515 (-1.42%) β¬οΈ Low 63,238 (+0.58%)
π 4π3π₯°3

Channel
@kpbtcsignal
On this record: Growth Β· Engagement Β· Reactions Β· Posts Β· Citations Β· Cite this entry
7,255subscribers
-29 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register Β· movement among entries of 3,162β10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001440023710 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @kpbtcsignal |
| Created | Between 1 April 2019 and 30 September 2021β estimated from Telegramβs id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 5 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 14 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/kpbtcsignal |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 14 Aug 2026, 07:08 | 7,255 | -19 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 19:15 | 7,274 | -8 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 12:43 | 7,282 | -2 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 00:00 | 7,284 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 23:57 | 7,284 | first reading |
95 posts held, back to 6 August 2026 β the reader has not yet reached the start of this channelβs public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 10 pagesof Telegramβs post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) Γ· viewsβ note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegramβs public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days Β· latest post in window 11 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 95 (6 August 2026 β 11 August 2026) |
| Views total | 7,088 |
| Reactions total | 946 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface β not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 12 Aug 2026, 02:12 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than βcorrectingβ the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form β 8.12K, 3.7M β so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded β read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
946 reactions across 95 posts, in 14 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 9.30% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| π | 88 | 9.30% | |
| π | 82 | 8.67% | |
| π | 77 | 8.14% | |
| π€¬ | 77 | 8.14% | |
| π | 71 | 7.51% | |
| π | 71 | 7.51% | |
| π€― | 71 | 7.51% | |
| π€ͺ | 69 | 7.29% | |
| π₯° | 68 | 7.19% | |
| π» | 63 | 6.66% | |
| π | 60 | 6.34% | |
| π | 53 | 5.60% | |
| π€£ | 53 | 5.60% | |
| π | 43 | 4.55% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities β π is thanks in one channel and mourning in another β so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one β 4.34K, 1.2M β so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 95 of the 95 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegramβs own count on each post β not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above β those same posts carry 946reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by βa reaction total printed elsewhere on the pageβ.
Measured over the 95 most recent posts we hold, published 6 August 2026 to 11 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
π Daily candle closed β #BTCUSDT β’β’β’ π·οΈ Price 63,602 π’ 24h -0.57% Vol 823.9M β¬οΈ High 64,515 (-1.42%) β¬οΈ Low 63,238 (+0.58%)
π 4π3π₯°3
#BTCUSDT OneHour RSI = 29.6 π΄ Last value = 33.9 RSI BTCUSDT: m5=34.9, m15=30.2, h1=29.6 π, h4=35.3, d1=48.4, w1=40.9 π·οΈ Price 63,373 π» dump β’β’β’ π’ 24h -0.81% Vol 831.9M β¬οΈ High 64,515 (-1.77%) β¬οΈ Low 63,252 (+0.19%) π’ RSI Overvalue h1
π€¬4π 3π€£3
π΄ #BTCUSDT π° 2.45M Long Liquidated π°π°π°π°π°π°π°π°π°π°π°π°π°π°π°π°π°π°π°π° In 23h, 53m $1.88M πΉ Short Liquidated $12.6M π Long Liquidated π΅ Price 63,326 π» dump β’β’β’ π’ 24h -0.74% Vol 6.38B β¬οΈ High 64,470 (-1.77%) β¬οΈ Low 63,288 (+0.06%) π₯ Binance Liquidation Data
π4π€¬4π2
#ADAUSDT 4οΈβ£FourHour4οΈβ£ RSI = 29.6 π΄ Last value = 35 RSI ADAUSDT: m5=46.8, m15=32, h1=24.3 π, h4=29.6 π, d1=59.1, w1=40.5 π·οΈ Price 0.185 π» dump β’β’β’ π’ 24h -5.13% Vol 16.3M β¬οΈ High 0.1965 (-5.85%) β¬οΈ Low 0.1837 (+0.71%) π’ RSI Overvalue h1
π»4π4π1π1
π° #BTC π $63,477 π Whale SELL π¦SignalsπΆ -648 USDT -1.01 % π’ 23h, 23m 24h -1.36% β64,515$ β63,470$ Vol 950.1M+25.2% Moves (8d, 7h ago)ππΉπΉπΉπΉππΉπππ(Now) β5 β5 π7 π₯3 +1.87% Long 61.4% Short 38.6% Ratio 1.6 OI 106,605 BTC βββββββββββββββ π° Bitcoin dump π₯π₯π₯ $63,477 RSI BTCUSDT: m5=24.7 π, m15=34.7, h1=35, h4=46.3, d1=48.4, w1=40.9
π3π€―3π3π€£1
π΅ π΅ π΅ π΅ π΅ π΅ π΅ π΅ π΅ π΅ 250,000,000 $USDC (250,034,625 USD) minted at USDC Treasury Details Source
π4π4π2
New Listing Binance Futures: 1. DOSUSDT $0.4705 -0.42%
π 5π€¬3π»2
π 24h pump in Top100 π βββββββββββββββ 93 VELVET $0.72 62.8% 83 CRV $0.27 9.5% 67 LIT $2.49 7.6% 37 WLFI $0.06 4.9% 15 LINK $8.68 4.5% βββββββββββββββ # NAME PRICE 24h π 24h dump in Top100 π βββββββββββββββ 95 BEAT $0.91 -64.2% 100 NIGHT $0.02 -4.8% 99 TIA $0.32 -4.3% 30 SHIB $0 -4% 21 CC $0.1 -4% βββββββββββββββ # NAME PRICE 24h BUBBLE
π€£4π 3π€―3
πΉ #USDT π P2P Latest Price: 25,839 VND +134 VND Latest USDT/VND Buy Orders (min $300.0) π· 25,839 VND 3M-200M VND π· 25,846 VND 3M-600M VND π· 25,856 VND 150K-10M VND π· 25,857 VND 2M-26.7M VND π +0.52 % β± 1d, 4h
π5π₯°3π€¬2
#BTC_1M is not moving in last 18h, 5m π¦ Signals #BTCUSDT β’β’β’ π·οΈ Price 64,225 π’ 24h -1.27% Vol 882M β¬οΈ High 65,238 (-1.55%) β¬οΈ Low 63,806 (+0.66%)
π€―4π 3π3
CoinGecko Trending Search 1. DOS (DAPPOS) #255 2. CYS (Cysic) #148 3. TAO (Bittensor) #40 4. CASHCAT (Cash Cat) #195 5. ICP (Internet Computer) #55 6. PENGU (Pudgy Penguins) #104 7. LINK (Chainlink) #18 8. XRP (XRP) #6 9. SOPH (Sophon) #948 10. GRVT (GRVT Token) #546 11. PUMP (Pump.fun) #62 12. LIT (Lighter) #86 13. BEAT (Audiera) #117 14. SOL (Solana) #7 15. TUT (Tutorial) #301
π6π€―2π2
Futures liquidation data π₯ β³24h Rekt Value: 208Mπ°π°π° πΉLong Value: 151.9Mπ°π° πShort Value: 56.1Mπ° - According to CoinGlass data, In the past 24 hours, 72,673 traders were liquidated, the total liquidations comes in at $207.97 million. - The largest single liquidation order happened on Hyperliquid - XYZ:BRENTOIL-USD value $10.55M. βββββββββββββββ π US Stock Markets π π DJIA 53,975.98 -0.11% π S&P 500 β¦
π€ͺ6π2π2
Showing the 12 most recent of 95 posts we hold for @kpbtcsignal. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked β was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it β t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so β1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank β 248,786 of 1,350,102entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below β republished posts weigh more than named mentions β and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channelβs name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page β a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason β naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides β the βNamed by N registered channelsβ figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 β this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
βπ CryptoNews 24/7 Real-Time Updatesβ (@kpbtcsignal), 7,255 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/kpbtcsignal.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV Β· JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.