Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

اخبار فوری ارزدیجیتال

@arzdigitalb

On this record: Topic · Observations · Also posting the same content · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

55,238subscribers

-137 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001366910165
TypeChannel
Username@arzdigitalb
Descriptionپوشش لحظه‌ای اخبار بیت‌ کوین و ارزهای دیجیتال ArzDigital Breaking News arzdigital.com/breaking تبلیغات : @Arzdigitalcom
CreatedBetween 1 March 2018 and 30 June 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held7
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/arzdigitalb

Topic

Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 97% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Content that also appears on other registered channels

Posts published here appear word for word on 3 other registered channels. They sit inside a group of 5 channels that share the same post bodies with each other. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.

Matching posts — open both and compare (6 of the pairs behind the counts below)
Posted firstThenOverlapGap
@arzdigitalb/32338 · this entry7 Aug 2026, 14:32 UTC@arznews/231957 Aug 2026, 14:32 UTC0.99under a minute
@arzdigitalb/32331 · this entry7 Aug 2026, 11:15 UTC@arznews/231887 Aug 2026, 11:15 UTC0.98under a minute
@arzdigitalb/32340 · this entry7 Aug 2026, 14:55 UTC@arznews/231977 Aug 2026, 14:55 UTC0.98under a minute
@arzdigitalb/32303 · this entry6 Aug 2026, 06:58 UTC@arznews/231596 Aug 2026, 06:58 UTC0.98under a minute
@arzdigitalb/32314 · this entry6 Aug 2026, 11:41 UTC@arznews/231706 Aug 2026, 11:41 UTC0.96under a minute
@arzdigitalb/32306 · this entry6 Aug 2026, 07:38 UTC@arznews/231626 Aug 2026, 07:38 UTC0.96under a minute
Every channel this entry shares post bodies with
ChannelMatching postsText overlapTypical gapPublished first
@arznews19 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)0.97under a minutethis entry (190)
@CRYPTOEMAD6 (6/6 hand-verifiable sample passed)0.945.6 hoursthis entry (60)
@Blockchain_ns5 (5/5 hand-verifiable sample passed)0.938.2 hoursthis entry (50)

Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.

What this cannot establish

MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.

Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. None of the 0 matches recorded here fall after that date, so for this entry we cannot say whether any of them carried a credit. The duplication is measured; the absence of attribution is not.

“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 42 comparable posts for this entry, running 5 August 2026 to 7 August 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.

The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.

  • Verbatim republication has three causes and the text separates only two: a clone/mirror, unattributed copy-paste, or BOTH channels copying a common third source that neither attributes. The spread filter (content held by at most 8 channels) reduces the third and does not remove it.
  • 'Earliest' means earliest IN THIS CORPUS. A channel ingested one page deep will look younger than a neighbour ingested in full; corpus_coverage above is there to be checked before the direction is believed.
  • shared_verified_est extrapolates the sampled pass rate over the full narrow match count; sampled/passed are the numbers actually measured.
  • Absence of a forward header is not proof of intent: Telegram lets a channel disable forward attribution, and a credit written in the body is not parsed as attribution here (mention_edge_either_way above is the closest available signal).

Across the whole group of 5, the earliest publisher we hold is @CRYPTOEMAD. That is a statement about our reading window, not a claim of authorship.

Recorded under the key clone_source, last confirmed 8 August 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Also posting the same content

This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 4 other registered channels, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.

Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.

Growth

55,23855,37555,306.56 August 2026 — 55,375 subscribers7 August 2026 — 55,369 subscribers8 August 2026 — 55,348 subscribers9 August 2026 — 55,331 subscribers10 August 2026 — 55,297 subscribers11 August 2026 — 55,268 subscribers12 August 2026 — 55,238 subscribers6 August 202612 August 2026
7 measurements spanning 5 days, net -137. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 55,217–55,396 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 01:3555,238-30
11 Aug 2026, 03:3255,268-29
10 Aug 2026, 03:4255,297-34
9 Aug 2026, 05:5255,331-17
8 Aug 2026, 03:3855,348-21
7 Aug 2026, 01:0055,369-6
6 Aug 2026, 18:4655,375first reading

Engagement

109 posts held, back to 5 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 17 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
5.25%
avg views ÷ 55,238 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,900
109 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.51%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
109
of 109 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 August 2026
Posts held109 (5 August 202611 August 2026)
Views total315,973
Reactions total1,610
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken12 Aug 2026, 19:33 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
30,300
Videos
330
Links
28,900

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Reaction mix

1,610 reactions across 109 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 36.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍58236.1%
56134.8%
🤣18511.5%
😢885.47%
🔥815.03%
🤯493.04%
🗿412.55%
👀231.43%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 109 of the 109 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,610reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 109 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 11 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
2
across the posts below
Posts paid on
2
of 109 we hold a reading for · 2%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @arzdigitalb. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 109 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 5 August 2026 to 11 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

11 Aug 2026, 19:44 UTC≈3,680 views50 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

⭕️شرکت استراتژی خرید بیت کوین را از سر می‌گیرد 🔸 فونگ لی، مدیرعامل شرکت استراتژی، اعلام کرد این شرکت قصد دارد پس از وقفه‌ای هفت‌هفته‌ای، خرید بیت کوین را در سال جاری از سر بگیرد. جزئیات بیشتر @arzdigitalb $BTC

26🤣17🗿4👍3

11 Aug 2026, 15:05 UTC≈4,070 views21 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

⭕️بلک راک: توکنیزه کردن دارایی‌ها، نسل بعدی بازارهای مالی است 🔸 بلک راک با بیش از ۱۵ تریلیون دلار دارایی تحت مدیریت، توکن‌سازی دارایی‌ها را «نسل بعدی بازارها» توصیف کرده است. این غول سرمایه‌گذاری معتقد است فناوری بلاک چین می‌تواند نحوه معامله، تسویه و مالکیت دارایی‌های سنتی مانند سهام و اوراق قرضه را متحول کند. جزئیات بیشتر @arzdigitalb

21

11 Aug 2026, 14:31 UTC≈3,780 views14 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

⭕️سرمایه‌گذاری سنگین چینی‌ها در طلا؛ تقاضای آسیایی مانع ریزش قیمت‌ شد 🔸 طبق داده‌های بلومبرگ، صندوق‌های ETF طلا در چین برای ۱۴ روز معاملاتی متوالی شاهد ورود سرمایه بودند که این طولانی‌ترین چرخه ورود نقدینگی از ماه مارس تاکنون محسوب می‌شود. 🔸 در این بازه زمانی، بیش از ۱.۲ میلیارد دلار سرمایه تازه وارد این صندوق‌ها شده است که بزرگ‌ترین ورود نقدینگی روزانه آن به ۳۷۰ میلیون دلار می‌رسد. جزئیات بیشتر @arzdigitalb

11😢3

11 Aug 2026, 14:13 UTC≈3,540 views27 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

⭕️پیش‌بینی هوش مصنوعی مایکروسافت از بیت‌ کوین؛ سیگنال یک رالی آرام صعودی 🔸 هوش مصنوعی مایکروسافت کوپایلوت در جدیدترین تحلیل خود، از شکل‌گیری یک رالی صعودی آرام برای بیت کوین خبر داده است. 🔸 بر اساس پیش‌بینی این ابزار هوش مصنوعی، تداوم نابرابری میان عرضه و تقاضا می‌تواند قیمت این دارایی را از محدوده ۶۳,۸۰۰ دلاری فعلی به ۱۷۰,۰۰۰ تا ۲۰۰,۰۰۰ دلار تا پایان سال ۲۰۲۶ برساند. این تحلیل بر پایه ورود نقدینگی از طریق ETFهای ن

👍125🔥5🤣5

11 Aug 2026, 14:11 UTC≈2,910 views13 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

⭕️پایان ورود ۵ روزه سرمایه به ETFهای بیت‌ کوین؛ خروج ۱۴۴ میلیون دلار در یک روز 🔸 صندوق‌های قابل معامله در بورس بیت کوین در ابتدای هفته معاملاتی جدید با خروج خالص ۱۴۴.۶۷ میلیون دلار سرمایه مواجه شدند که این اتفاق به روند مثبت پنج روزه ورود نقدینگی به این صندوق‌ها پایان داد. 🔸 در این میان، صندوق‌های اتریوم نیز با خروج سرمایه مواجه شدند، اما محصولات مرتبط با سولانا و هایپ توانستند سرمایه جدید جذب کنند. جزئیات بیشتر

👍84😢1

11 Aug 2026, 13:56 UTC≈2,570 views21 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

⭕️چراغ سبز روسیه به کریپتو؛ بیت‌ کوین، اتریوم و تتر وارد معاملات رسمی شدند 🔸 بانک مرکزی روسیه بیت کوین، اتریوم و تتر را برای معامله عمومی در صرافی‌های دارای مجوز این کشور تأیید کرد. این تصمیم که در ۲۰ مرداد گرفته شده، نخستین بار است که چند دارایی دیجیتال تحت قانون جدید ارزهای دیجیتال روسیه مجوز ورود به معاملات سازمان‌یافته را دریافت می‌کنند. چارچوب جدید از اول سپتامبر ۲۰۲۶ اجرایی خواهد شد. 🔸 بر اساس مقررات جدید، تن

👍155🔥1

11 Aug 2026, 13:26 UTC≈2,590 views14 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

⭕️افشای همکاری هکرهای کره‌شمالی با دلالان چینی برای پول‌شویی رمزارزهای سرقتی 🔸 گزارش جدید مؤسسه سلطنتی خدمات متحد بریتانیا نشان می‌دهد کره‌شمالی برای پول‌شویی ارزهای دیجیتال سرقت‌شده، بیش از گذشته به شبکه‌های جنایی و باندهای کلاهبرداری بین‌المللی متکی شده است. 🔸 بر اساس این تحقیق، هکرهای وابسته به کره‌شمالی از ژانویه ۲۰۲۴ تا سپتامبر ۲۰۲۵ دست‌کم ۲.۸ میلیارد دلار دارایی دیجیتال سرقت کرده‌اند؛ منابعی که گمان می‌رود بر

7🤯5👍2

11 Aug 2026, 13:11 UTC≈2,670 views19 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

⭕️هشدار تحلیلگر سرشناس: شکست این حمایت باعث سقوط ۲۵ درصدی ADA می‌شود 🔸 ارز دیجیتال بومی شبکه کاردانو که در یک ماه اخیر با رشد ۱۳ درصدی یکی از بهترین عملکردهای بازار را داشت، اکنون با مانع بزرگی روبرو شده است. 🔸 مارتینز به چندین فاکتور منفی دیگر از جمله تشکیل تقاطع مرگ بین نسبت MVRV کاردانو و میانگین متحرک ساده ۷ روزه اشاره کرده است که نشان‌دهنده تضعیف مومنتوم صعودی است. همچنین اندیکاتور TD Sequential در نمودار روزا

👍114🤣4

11 Aug 2026, 13:09 UTC≈2,440 views14 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

⭕️همکاری مانی‌گرم و سولانا؛ تسهیل تبدیل ارز دیجیتال به پول نقد در ۱۷۰ کشور 🔸 شرکت مانی‌گرم، ارائه‌دهنده خدمات انتقال پول، زیرساخت تبدیل پول نقد و ارزهای دیجیتال خود را به شبکه سولانا گسترش داده است. این اقدام به کیف پول‌ها، صرافی‌ها و اپلیکیشن‌های فعال در اکوسیستم سولانا اجازه می‌دهد به شبکه گسترده پرداخت نقدی مانی‌گرم متصل شوند. جزئیات بیشتر @arzdigitalb $SOL

7👍7

11 Aug 2026, 12:17 UTC≈2,690 views19 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

⭕️طلا مرز ۱۹ میلیون تومان را شکست؛ سکه در آستانه ۱۹۰ میلیون تومان 🔸 قیمت طلای ۱۸ عیار امروز سه‌شنبه ۲۰ مرداد با ادامه روند صعودی از مرز ۱۹ میلیون تومان عبور کرد و وارد کانال جدیدی شد. 🔸 رشد حدود یک درصدی نرخ دلار در بازار داخلی، در کنار افزایش قیمت جهانی طلا طی یک هفته گذشته و ورود اونس به کانال ۴٬۳۹۰ دلار، از مهم‌ترین عوامل صعود قیمت طلا در بازار ایران بوده‌اند. جزئیات بیشتر @arzdigitalb

😢123👍3🔥1

11 Aug 2026, 11:57 UTC≈2,680 views17 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

⭕️ریزش ۱۹ درصدی قیمت ریون کوین در پی شناسایی نقص امنیتی و دو شاخه شدن شبکه 🔸 پروژه ریون کوین از شناسایی یک آسیب‌پذیری بحرانی در سازوکار اجماع شبکه خبر داده است. این نقص از ۷ اوت (۱۶ مرداد) مورد سوءاستفاده قرار گرفته و باعث شده برخی گره‌های آسیب‌پذیر، بلاک‌های نامعتبر را به‌عنوان بلاک معتبر بپذیرند. 🔸 انتشار این خبر فشار فروش سنگینی بر ریون کوین وارد کرد. قیمت ریون کوین با افت حدود ۱۹.۱ درصدی به ۰.۰۰۲۸۸ دلار رسید و

8👍5🤣3😢1

11 Aug 2026, 11:01 UTC≈3,060 views14 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

⭕️سقوط ریپل به کف ۲۱ ماهه همزمان با عقب‌نشینی بیت کوین به ۶۴ هزار دلار 🔸 بازار ارز دیجیتال در ۲۴ ساعت گذشته با موجی از فشار فروش مواجه شده است که در پی آن، بیت کوین پس از ناتوانی در حفظ سطح ۶۵,۰۰۰ دلار، به محدوده ۶۴,۰۰۰ دلار عقب‌نشینی کرد. 🔸 در میان آلت کوین‌ها، ریپل یکی از بدترین عملکردهای اخیر را به ثبت رسانده و به پایین‌ترین سطح ۲۱ ماهه خود رسیده است. این دارایی اکنون در لبه سقوط به زیر سطح روانی ۱.۰۰ دلار قرار

😢5👍4🤣32

Showing the 12 most recent of 109 posts we hold for @arzdigitalb. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 17,581 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 17 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

مجله‌ نوبیتکس
@Nobitexmag · 150,136
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 12 August 2026
قیمت لحظه ای دلار ، ارز ، سکه و طلا
@irancurrency · 279,268
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 10 August 2026
Nobitex | نوبیتکس
@nobitexmarket · 322,958
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 10 August 2026
Toncoin فارسی
@toncoin_fa · 420,865
Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 10 August 2026
اخبار بدون سانسور
@ucn_ir · 170,605
Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 12 August 2026
JUST IN TIME
@abshdh · 193,872
Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 12 August 2026
ShitCoin‌‌‌‌ New🐳شت کوین
@shitcoink · 305,221
Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 12 August 2026
[ آقای اقتصاد ]
@Aghaye_Eghtesad · 641,811
Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 8 August 2026
قیمت آنلاین / اخبار اقتصادی
@currency_gold · 544,725
Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 9 August 2026
امید فدوی | کریپتو، طلا و اقتصاد
@omidfadavi_com · 162,356
Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 12 August 2026
کانال عرضه اولیه
@Arzeh1avalieh · 193,089
Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 11 August 2026
Ecoehsan | اکواحسان
@eco_ehsan · 899,495
Telegram ranks this channel #32 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 8 August 2026
اخبارفوری خبرفوری جنگ فوری امریکا
@ga_os · 5,082,707
Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 7 August 2026
کریپتو حاج 🐋 بازار ارزدیجیتال
@CryptoHaj · 375,351
Telegram ranks this channel #36 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 10 August 2026
BITFA ™️‌| بیتفا
@bitfa · 223,509
Telegram ranks this channel #46 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 11 August 2026
بشکن Beshkan
@beshkan · 278,301
Telegram ranks this channel #51 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 10 August 2026
Iran International ایران اینترنشنال
@iranintltv · 1,372,102
Telegram ranks this channel #55 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 8 August 2026
Atena khadem | آتنا خادم
@atena_khadem_org · 183,932
Telegram ranks this channel #59 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 11 August 2026
نبض بازار / اقتصاد 💰
@NabzehBazaar · 408,470
Telegram ranks this channel #59 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 10 August 2026
تیم علمی سایکولوژی
@lovoology · 147,125
Telegram ranks this channel #62 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 12 August 2026
TROON🔷محسن ترون
@TROON · 1,094,516
Telegram ranks this channel #65 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 8 August 2026
پادچی | پادکست و کتاب صوتی
@podchi · 436,830
Telegram ranks this channel #68 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 10 August 2026
تلویزیون منوتو
@manototv · 390,863
Telegram ranks this channel #68 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 10 August 2026
BBCPersian
@bbcpersian · 778,474
Telegram ranks this channel #68 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 8 August 2026

This channel appears in 29 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“اخبار فوری ارزدیجیتال” (@arzdigitalb), 55,238 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/arzdigitalb.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.