8 measurements spanning 6 days, net -82. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 59,068–59,174 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
13 Aug 2026, 06:09
59,080
-8
12 Aug 2026, 07:52
59,088
-8
11 Aug 2026, 04:57
59,096
-4
10 Aug 2026, 07:25
59,100
-19
9 Aug 2026, 07:51
59,119
-19
8 Aug 2026, 05:04
59,138
-12
7 Aug 2026, 05:06
59,150
-12
6 Aug 2026, 23:46
59,162
first reading
Engagement
78 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 18 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
4.81%
avg views ÷ 59,080 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,840
78 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.941%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
78
of 78 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 13 August 2026
Posts held
78 (5 August 2026 – 13 August 2026)
Views total
221,590
Reactions total
2,085
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
13 Aug 2026, 07:49 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈11,300
Videos
≈281
Links
≈6,930
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 13 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Reaction mix
2,085 reactions across 78 posts, in 22 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 44.5% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
927
44.5%
😁
356
17.1%
👍
251
12.0%
🙏
140
6.71%
🤣
139
6.67%
👀
79
3.79%
👌
52
2.49%
🔥
29
1.39%
👏
25
1.20%
🌭
23
1.10%
✍
16
0.767%
❤🔥
12
0.576%
😢
9
0.432%
😱
6
0.288%
🤔
5
0.24%
😭
4
0.192%
👨💻
3
0.144%
😍
3
0.144%
🙈
2
0.096%
🥰
2
0.096%
2 further kinds
2
0.096%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 78 of the 78 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2,085reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 78 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 13 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
2
across the posts below
Posts paid on
2
of 78 we hold a reading for · 3%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @Fivemincryptoann. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 78 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 5 August 2026 to 13 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Ông lớn Phố Wall chi $2,25B thu tóm công ty ETF crypto
• Goldman Sachs chốt mua lại NEOS Investments với giá tối đa $2,25B, trả bằng tiền mặt kèm cổ phiếu
• NEOS đang quản lý khoảng $32B qua 19 quỹ ETF, bao gồm các quỹ ETF BTC & ETH
• Họ mua nguyên cả công ty quản lý ETF, bao gồm đội ngũ, sản phẩm, tệp khách và kênh phân phối. Thương vụ dự kiến hoàn tất trong Q1/2027
Quý 1 vừa rồi, Goldman đã giảm bớt 10% vị thế …
🔥🔥🔥 Tin vắn Thị trường Thứ Năm - 13/08
+ Vàng giữ mốc $4K4, chứng khoán Mỹ đi ngang, BTC tăng trước tin rồi quay lại vùng $63K khi CPI không gây bất ngờ [CT]
+ Dầu brent giữ mốc $90, Iran bác bỏ tin đàm phán có tiến triển, còn Trump thì tuyên bố đã kiểm soát Hormuz [CT]
+ 19h30 tối nay: Lạm phát PPI 🇺🇸 tháng 7
- Lạm phát PPI Y/Y (Dự báo = 5,0%, trước đó = 5,5%)
- Lạm phát Core PPI Y/Y (Dự báo = 4,3%, trước đó = 4…
Ví crypto bị rút sạch $25M, nghi do lộ private key
Tài sản nằm trong 2 ví của nạn nhân, gồm DAI, WBTC, aUSDC, LDO, sUSDe và ETH, bị chuyển sang một ví mới chỉ trong 15 phút.
Sau 1 tiếng, số tiền đã được đổi thành DAI và ETH. Hiện $20M DAI đã chuyển sang địa chỉ khác, vẫn còn gần 3.000 ETH nằm ở ví gom.
ScamSniffer nghiêng về khả năng nạn nhân đã bị lộ private key, chứ không phải chiêu lừa ký cấp quyền token thường…
Cả 2 chỉ số lạm phát CPI 🇺🇸 tháng 7 đều hạ nhiệt đúng dự báo, trở về mức trước khi chiến sự nổ ra vào tháng 3/2026 và kéo kỳ vọng Fed tăng lãi suất tháng 9 từ 50% → 40%.
Thị trường nhìn chung chỉ phản ứng nhẹ và tiếp tục đi ngang chờ biến số mới:
• Vàng nhích gần 1%, vẫn quanh vùng $4K4
• Chứng khoán Mỹ trái chiều. Dow Jones đỏ nhẹ, S&P 500 và Nasdaq đóng phiên xanh. Nhóm AI dẫn dắt, nổi bật có SpaceX +10% nhờ tin …
Trump bị kiện vì bán quyền truy cập sớm post Truth Social
The Intercept Media và Freedom of the Press Foundation đã đệ đơn lên tòa án New York, cáo buộc đây là hành vi tham nhũng và vi hiến.
Hai tổ chức trên lập luận rằng các bài đăng của Tổng thống có thể ảnh hưởng tới thị trường. Nếu một nhóm khách hàng được nhận thông tin sớm hơn công chúng vài giây hoặc vài phút, họ cũng có lợi thế phản ứng trước.
Ước tính hiệ…
⚡️⚡️⚡️⚡️⚡️⚡️ Lạm phát CPI 🇺🇸 tháng 7
- CPI Y/Y 3,4% (Dự báo = 3,4%, trước đó = 3,5%)
- CPI M/M 0,1% (Dự báo = 0,1%, trước đó = -0,4%)
- CPI Lõi Y/Y 2,5% (Dự báo = 2,5%, trước đó = 2,6%)
- CPI Lõi M/M 0,2% (Dự báo = 0,2%, trước đó = 0,0%)
👉Báo cáo CPI đúng như dự báo. Xác suất Fed tăng lãi tháng 9 tiếp tục giảm xuống chỉ còn 34%.
Giả làm startup crypto tuyển dụng IT Triều Tiên
Một nhóm nghiên cứu bảo mật đã dựng startup DeFi giả để dụ IT Triều Tiên ứng tuyển. Mục đích là để xem cách họ qua mặt nhà tuyển dụng và xâm nhập vào trong doanh nghiệp.
Kết quả nhóm tuyển được 3 người và phát hiện 3 điểm đáng chú ý:
1️⃣ Người đầu tiên giới thiệu người thứ hai, rồi người thứ hai lại kéo thêm người thứ ba, chứ không tự ứng tuyển riêng lẻ.
2️⃣ Sau khi…
Drama tranh giành quyền lực ở Ondo sau khi CEO qua đời
Cuối T5/2026, founder kiêm CEO Nathan Allman đột ngột qua đời. Một cuộc chiến quyền lực đã diễn ra sau khi chủ tịch Ian De Bode tiếp quản ghế CEO Ondo Finance.
Mẹ của Nathan, bà Kathleen, sau khi thừa kế cổ phần cho rằng mình mới có quyền kiểm soát Ondo. Bà đưa thêm người vào hội đồng quản trị và tìm cách loại De Bode khỏi bộ máy điều hành.
Đến tháng 8, bà đệ …
Bitcoin đang tích lũy rủi ro thanh lý quanh $61K trước thềm CPI
Theo Glassnode, vài tuần qua BTC đã tích một lượng lớn lệnh Long quanh mốc này. Nếu giá quét xuống, một làn sóng vị thế bị ép đóng sẽ tạo thêm áp lực bán.
Trùng hợp, khu vực $61K–$62K cũng nằm trong vùng 5PC dự báo BTC có thể lùi về kiểm định trước khi có thêm diễn biến mới (👉chi tiết dự báo TẠI ĐÂY)
Chất xúc tác duy nhất có thể bẻ gãy hoặc kích hoạt …
⚠️ Harmony một lần nữa lại bị hack
Thông tin đến giờ là hacker đã mint thêm 4 tỷ $ONE ~ 26% tổng cung. Phần lớn đã được gửi lên sàn để bán tháo.
Đội ngũ cho biết đang phối hợp với các sàn để đóng băng dòng tiền liên quan, đồng thời chuẩn bị bản vá và cân nhắc phương án rollback mạng lưới.
Update: $ONE giảm hơn 50%, rồi bật lại giá ban đầu, sau đó về lòng đất tiếp🙏
😁18🙏7👍5❤2
Showing the 12 most recent of 78 posts we hold for @Fivemincryptoann. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@Fivemincryptoann edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
12 August 2026
Most recent edit
12 August 2026
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 58,714 of 1,169,250entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 6 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Whale Alert @whale_alert_io · 304,563 Telegram ranks this channel #55 of 99 here — alongside 98 others — read 10 August 2026
The Bull @thebull_crypto · 178,808 Telegram ranks this channel #84 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 12 August 2026
Binance Futures Liquidations @BinanceLiquidations · 183,475 Telegram ranks this channel #92 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 12 August 2026
This channel appears in 3 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“5 Phút Crypto | Channel” (@Fivemincryptoann), 59,080 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Fivemincryptoann.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.