Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Half Real Half Digital

@Half_Real_Half_Digital

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

2,862subscribers

-9 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001839941487
TypeChannel
Username@Half_Real_Half_Digital
CreatedBetween 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 13 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/Half_Real_Half_Digital

Growth

2,8622,8712,866.56 August 2026 — 2,871 subscribers7 August 2026 — 2,868 subscribers10 August 2026 — 2,870 subscribers13 August 2026 — 2,862 subscribers6 August 202613 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 6 days, net -9. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 2,861–2,872 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Aug 2026, 05:072,862-8
10 Aug 2026, 05:512,870+2
7 Aug 2026, 13:042,868-3
6 Aug 2026, 17:322,871first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 27 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
53.2%
avg views ÷ 2,862 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,520
20 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.55%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
20
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026
Posts held20 (27 July 20266 August 2026)
Views total30,480
Reactions total471
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Aug 2026, 16:06 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
21s
Average length
21s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

471 reactions across 20 posts, in 13 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 23.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥10923.1%
🤣9620.4%
custom 54339995635663721268117.2%
custom 54339705209975163515812.3%
👀388.07%
🤔245.10%
custom 5458681293212490944194.03%
custom 5431381858308873852122.55%
custom 5469733743008702031122.55%
custom 544534006393421025991.91%
custom 543175831219236640681.70%
custom 543160459531284190930.637%
🏆20.425%

Custom emoji. 8 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 471reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 27 July 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
14
across the posts below
Posts paid on
12
of 20 we hold a reading for · 60%
Most on one post
2
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @Half_Real_Half_Digital. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 27 July 2026 to 6 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

6 Aug 2026, 12:15 UTC≈1,350 views24 reactions1 Starread 7 August 2026
Photo

Casino always wins 🥂

custom 543138185830887385211custom 54339705209975163517custom 54317583121923664063custom 54339995635663721263

5 Aug 2026, 14:26 UTC≈1,270 views17 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Haters gonna hate 🤏

custom 543399956356637212611🔥5custom 54697337430087020311

4 Aug 2026, 19:19 UTC≈1,390 views20 reactions1 Starread 7 August 2026
Photo

Как вам кошелек для стэйблов от CloudFlare Стэйблкоинс вил вин 🙌

custom 543397052099751635112🔥4custom 54339995635663721263🤣1

4 Aug 2026, 01:54 UTC≈1,590 views23 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Что несется

👀18🤔3custom 54586812932124909442

3 Aug 2026, 14:13 UTC≈1,030 views13 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @whale_alert_io

📉 📉 📉 Morgan Stanley downgrades Circle to Underweight and cuts price target to $38 on slower USDC growth Read Analysis

custom 54317583121923664065👀4🤔3🤣1

3 Aug 2026, 13:48 UTC≈1,080 views24 reactions2 Starsread 7 August 2026
Voice message

🤑 Про продажу BTC Сэйлором. Что это значит?

🤔10custom 54339995635663721268🔥3custom 54339705209975163512🤣1

2 Aug 2026, 22:15 UTC≈1,840 views25 reactions1 Starread 7 August 2026

✏️ Coinbase становится расчетным слоем для ИИ агентов. По данным Artemis за 2ой квартал 2026: - 99%+ ончейн-агентской торговли совершалось в 🤑USDC (от Circle 🥂) - 97%+ ончейн-агентских транзакций проходили через x402 (протокол Coinbase 🤏) - 90%+ агентского объема стейблкоинов поселились на Base (снова Coinbase)

🔥15custom 54339705209975163516custom 54339995635663721264

1 Aug 2026, 12:03 UTC≈1,270 views45 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

Когда вся эта индустрия рухнет как карточный домик, плз не говорите, что не было никаких сигналов

🤣38custom 54697337430087020314custom 54453400639342102592custom 54313818583088738521

1 Aug 2026, 01:24 UTC≈2,110 views39 reactions2 Starsread 7 August 2026
Photo

📈 На Hyperliquid примерно 75% объемов сейчас это RWA активы, то есть перпы на акции / золото итд Еще раз, на блокчеин based продукте 75% рынка занимают перпы на не крипто продукты Сильно

custom 543399956356637212627🔥7custom 54339705209975163514🤔1

31 Jul 2026, 15:05 UTC≈1,240 views13 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Posted without readable text

👀9custom 54339995635663721264

30 Jul 2026, 21:55 UTC≈1,970 views37 reactions1 Starread 7 August 2026

🤑 Глава министерства финансов США Бессент: Сенату нужно голосовать СЕЙЧАС по этому эпохальному законодательству. Правда в том, что сенаторы-демократы боятся продвигать Clarity Act, поскольку опасаются сенатора Уоррен и «Антикрипто-армии», которую она когда-то обещала создать. В ближайшие дни лидер Тун поставит эту теорию на проверку. Будут ли сенаторы-демократы на стороне американской исключительности или предпочтут

🔥15custom 543399956356637212611custom 54339705209975163516custom 54453400639342102593custom 54316045953128419092

30 Jul 2026, 16:36 UTC≈1,130 views11 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @unfolded_defiPhoto

Aave accounts for 47.8% of active loans onchain. Lending sits at the intersection of stablecoins and tokenized assets used as collateral — link | AI comment

🔥7custom 54339705209975163513custom 54339995635663721261

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @Half_Real_Half_Digital. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 837,177 of 1,169,250entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Half Real Half Digital” (@Half_Real_Half_Digital), 2,862 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Half_Real_Half_Digital.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.