Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

USMortality

@usmortality

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

6,778subscribers

-19 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001609122877
TypeChannel
Username@usmortality
Created8 December 2021measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 August 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 13 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/usmortality

Growth

6,7786,7976,787.56 August 2026 — 6,797 subscribers6 August 2026 — 6,797 subscribers7 August 2026 — 6,794 subscribers10 August 2026 — 6,784 subscribers13 August 2026 — 6,778 subscribers6 August 202613 August 2026
5 measurements spanning 7 days, net -19. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 6,775–6,800 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Aug 2026, 04:256,778-6
10 Aug 2026, 10:206,784-10
7 Aug 2026, 08:226,794-3
6 Aug 2026, 10:216,797no change
6 Aug 2026, 09:546,797first reading

Engagement

19 posts held, back to 20 August 2024the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 10 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 6 February 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
18s
Average length
18s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

811 reactions across 19 posts, in 19 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 32.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥26032.1%
👍18622.9%
🤬11714.4%
👏425.18%
394.81%
😢384.69%
🤔323.95%
🤡263.21%
🤮182.22%
💯161.97%
👎111.36%
🙏101.23%
🤣40.493%
🏆30.37%
🤯30.37%
👨‍💻20.247%
😭20.247%
😁10.123%
😱10.123%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 811reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 20 August 2024 to 6 February 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

6 Feb 2026, 17:13 UTC≈1,590 views17 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

🚀 MortalityWatch 3.0 — Complete refactor & rewrite 6 months of work. 597 commits. Here's what's new: 📊 Age-Standardized Deaths (ASD) Compare mortality fairly across different age structures ✨ New Features: • Discover page — browse all charts visually • Life Expectancy tracking with seasonal adjustment • Z-score analysis • Social login (X & Google) • QR code sharing • 5 baseline methods for excess calculations • Pr

👏6🔥54👍1😁1

Signed Ben M

16 Nov 2025, 05:12 UTC≈2,490 views34 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Today I've heard the frist time about the killed ostriches in Canada. Its so hartbreaking. Its so disgusting. This all happens because of the unproven hypothesis of viroligy. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y4rM8uSFmuk Please wathch and share!

😢19🤬141

Signed Ben M

30 May 2025, 15:24 UTC≈4,650 views36 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

German RKI Admits No Negative Controls in Viral Genome Sequencing Scientific standards abandoned in foundational virological research. Full article: https://www.usmortality.com/p/german-rki-admits-no-negative-controls

👍19🔥11💯3👏21

Signed Ben M

19 Mar 2025, 14:20 UTC≈9,480 views25 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Video

🚨 NEW: The latest 2025 #JFKfiles batch is now fully OCR’d and searchable! Here's a single TXT file containing all text of the PDF. It could be used for search or to feed it to Chat-GPT/Grok: https://t.co/xqepcL3LKG 🔎 Explore now: http://searchjfkfiles.com

👍194👨‍💻2

Signed Ben M

12 Mar 2025, 16:01 UTC≈8,110 views58 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

A sigh of relief sweeps across the country: Critics and COVID resistance groups finally admit that measures like lockdowns, masks, and vaccine mandates were justified after all—after all, it was a new and malicious lab-created virus! ---- Ein Aufatmen geht durchs Land: Querdenker und Corona-Widerstand geben nun endlich zu, dass Maßnahmen wie Lockdowns, Masken und Impfpflichten doch gerechtfertigt waren – schließlich

🤡26🤮18👎8🤣42

Signed Ben M

7 Mar 2025, 17:43 UTC≈4,500 views73 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

🔥 We won against the RKI! The German RKI only responded to my SARS-CoV-2 sequencing FOIA request after we took them to court. The court has now ruled, and the RKI will cover the costs of the proceedings.

🔥43👍13👏125

Signed Ben M

3 Mar 2025, 15:36 UTC≈16,700 views62 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Since 2000, measles vaccines may have caused 16 times more deaths than measles itself! Read my full article here: https://www.usmortality.com/p/since-2000-measles-vaccines-may-have X post: https://x.com/USMortality/status/1896582707393818946

🤬47💯114

Signed Ben M

11 Feb 2025, 21:58 UTC≈3,990 views25 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Full High Resolution Data for 🇨🇦 Canada is now available! - National & all Provinces - Weekly: since 2010, 0-44, 45-64, 65-84, 85+ - Yearly: since 1991, 10y age groups 🔗 https://www.mortality.watch

🔥19👍51

Signed Ben M

9 Jan 2025, 19:12 UTC≈5,170 views24 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Critical Examination of the Arguments for a Lab Origin of SARS-CoV-2 Thoughts on the Feasibility of the Lab Leak Hypothesis https://www.usmortality.com/p/critical-examination-of-the-arguments

🔥14👍6👎2👏2

Signed Ben M

7 Jan 2025, 15:24 UTC≈3,930 views33 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

🔥🔥🔥 Response from the German RKI on Virus Sequencing A pending lawsuit urges the organization to reply to my uncomfortable questions! - Substack: https://www.usmortality.com/p/response-from-the-german-rki-on-virus - X (German): https://x.com/USMortality/status/1876650231850267129 - X (English): https://x.com/USMortality/status/1876650223440740355

🔥18👍11👏4

Signed Ben M

6 Jan 2025, 23:16 UTC≈9,560 views62 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

🔥🔥🔥 A new peer-reviewed study from 🇯🇵Japan has found that individuals vaccinated against COVID-19 experienced a significantly higher likelihood of infection compared to unvaccinated individuals. Additionally, the study reported that social distancing and masking did not appear to reduce infection rates. However, personal hygiene, healthy eating habits, and regular exercise were associated with a decreased risk of i

🔥45👍151👏1

Signed Ben M

30 Dec 2024, 19:35 UTC≈28,000 views31 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Check out my detailed refutation of Wilf’s claims about COVID-19 vaccine efficacy in the Kirsch/Wilf $2M vaccine debate! https://www.usmortality.com/p/debunking-pro-vaccine-arguments-in

👍29👏1🔥1

Signed Ben M

Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @usmortality. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 317,308 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 6 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“USMortality” (@usmortality), 6,778 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/usmortality.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.