If Sadiq Khan was expanding ULEZ because he genuinely gave a stuff about air quality he would do something about the tube stations. His expansion is a massive scam. Watch this video and prepare to be shocked
👍5

Channel
@kbfpod
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
121subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001837042377 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @kbfpod |
| Description | The Home of Keeping it Real |
| Created | Between 1 October 2022 and 22 April 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 9 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 9 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/kbfpod |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 9 Aug 2026, 03:46 | 121 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 08:41 | 121 | first reading |
18 posts held, back to 22 April 2023 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 18 posts for this entry, the most recent from 19 May 2023. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 9 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
14 reactions across 9 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 64.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 9 | 64.3% | |
| 🤮 | 2 | 14.3% | |
| 🤡 | 1 | 7.14% | |
| 🤨 | 1 | 7.14% | |
| 🥴 | 1 | 7.14% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 14reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 22 April 2023 to 19 May 2023, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
If Sadiq Khan was expanding ULEZ because he genuinely gave a stuff about air quality he would do something about the tube stations. His expansion is a massive scam. Watch this video and prepare to be shocked
👍5
https://youtu.be/3EnYUJNo3Lw
🤡1
Test ignored as it would have totally destroyed the narrative @KBFPod
Twitter is Down! Undergoing maintenance ... You don't see that every day! Did you know Elon Musk signed the petition to stop the progress of AI in mind? @KBFPod
Just when you think the 'what else can we blame it on' culture couldn't get anymore ridiculous ... this headline pops up! https://www.dailymail.co.uk/health/article-12016417/Oral-sex-fueling-epidemic-throat-cancers-UK-doctor-claims.html?ito=native_share_article-top @KBFPod ~ Home of Keeping it Real Keep Britain Free
🥴1
Yet more evidence of the harms caused by unnecessary mask wearing.
“Fresh air has around 0.04% CO2, while wearing masks more than 5 min bears a possible chronic exposure to carbon dioxide of 1.41% to 3.2% of the inhaled air. US Navy toxicity experts set the exposure limits for submarines carrying a female crew to 0.8% CO2 based on animal studies which indicated an increased risk for stillbirths. Additionally, mammals who were chronically exposed to 0.3% CO2 the experimental data de…
🤨1
In support of those who’ve suffered or continue to suffer. Please share with those you know are.
🤒 If You’ve Been Feeling Unwell Since Your Covid-19 Vaccine, You’re Not Alone and Support is Available Many people are experiencing unexplained symptoms that include: • Headaches • Vision and hearing problems • Period problems, heavy bleeding • Heart attacks, chest pain, arrhythmias, palpitations • Blood clots and blood pressure issues • Movement and postural difficulties • Swelling, skin rashes and bruising • Fati…
👍1
Tucker on his part in the misinformation war against all people of the world.
👍1
Just one share from us today and its this
Having just seen a twitter user showing his local shop now using facial recognition - it’s essential we support the block on this action against our privacy. We know it’s about laying foundations so even if shops suggest it’s about moving forward with tech - WE SAY NO!
👍1
Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @kbfpod. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“KBFPod ~ Keep Britain Free” (@kbfpod), 121 subscribers as measured 9 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/kbfpod.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.