Channel
@OutMedMan
On this record: Also posting the same content · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
236subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001204880754 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @OutMedMan |
| Description | medicalmandates.org - Medical mandates are based on assumptions. When the assumptions are FALSE, medical mandates are WRONG. They should be OUTLAWED, everywhere, forever. |
| Created | 31 January 2021 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 7 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/OutMedMan |
This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 1 other registered channel, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.
Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 7 Aug 2026, 02:46 | 236 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 23:00 | 236 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 2 February 2023 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 23 July 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (2 February 2023 – 23 July 2026) |
| Views total | 8 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 7 Aug 2026, 02:46 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 7 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Hey guys, I don't know if anybody is still tuning into this chat. It's been a long time! I wanted to let you know that, in the last few years, I moved from overt activism to a more spiritual means of empowerment for self and others. I've been practising Buddhism for 30 years now, and I wholeheartedly believe there is wisdom in these teachings that every human being can benefit from. It's not so much a religion as …
Signed Mina Dew
The WHO Has Declared Covid Over but the Real Pandemic Has Just Begun: Iatrogenic C19 ‘Vaccine’ Injury On the 13th May, the truth will be told around the world... https://drtesslawrie.substack.com/p/the-who-has-declared-covid-over-but The experimental covid-19 ‘vaccines’ have caused extreme suffering and loss around the world. This is the reality for countless people and families. Loss of health, well-being, vitali…
Signed Mina Dew
Justice for Vaccine injuries: Class Action Covid UK on The Richie Allen Show, Thursday 27 April. Mina talks to Richie Allen in the second half of the show. https://www.podomatic.com/podcasts/richieallen/episodes/2023-04-27T11_27_02-07_00 
Signed Mina Dew
Who out there got the COVID jab or knows someone who got the jab and now regrets it and doesn't know what to do? Here is your solution. We have a protocol to detox the mRNA and spike protein from your body! Please read this and SHARE WIDELY! You just might save someone's life by sharing this information! Advanced Healing & Recovery Protocol: How to Neutralize Damage from mRNA Shots @TheTruthAboutCancer_Vaccines
Signed Mina Dew
I’ll be on the Richie Allen show this evening just after 6pm, talking about Class Action Covid UK and informed consent, and how to prevent another pandemic of VACCINE INJURIES. Tune in at: https://richieallen.co.uk/
Signed Mina Dew
The Perseus group report on the MHRA failures was sent this morning to all MPs and HoL members. There is a supporting letter open for signatures which is planned to be presented at Downing St on 27th April. Please sign and share: https://perseus.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2023/04/Perseus_MHRA_Main-Report-1-1.pdf 1. Please read it 2. Sign the open letter at @Togetherdec https://togetherdeclaration.org/MHRA/# 3. Writ…
Signed Mina Dew
Further discussion of the vax injury case with Sue & Steve Chatton of Rebels on Roundabouts on Unity News: https://rumble.com/v2g840a-the-freedom-show-unity-news-network-ep-11-mina-dew.html Vax injury claimants: see https://cacuk.uk/green-light-for-vax-injury-test-case/ for how to submit your case for review.
Signed Mina Dew
CACUK’s vax injury case discussed on Unity News with political commentator Anthony Webber: https://odysee.com/@UnityNewsNetwork:6/AWP:d? Vax injury claimants: See https://cacuk.uk/green-light-for-vax-injury-test-case/ for how to submit your case for review.
Signed Mina Dew
Researchers from St George's Hospital, London find wearing masks in hospital made no difference to Covid infection rates. 'Lead author Dr Ben Patterson said: 'Our study found no evidence that mandatory masking of staff impacts the rate of hospital SARS-CoV-2 infection with the Omicron variant' The research will be presented later this month at the European Congress of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases in …
Signed Mina Dew
Vax Injury Test Case Class Action Covid UK is now inviting those who have been harmed by any of the Covid vaccines to contact us at: hello@cacuk.uk Please let people know about this. We can only consider cases in England or Wales currently. Claimants should email us with the following details: 1. Date of vaccination/s (include a copy of your vaccination record, if you have it) 2. Details of your injury and when …
Signed Mina Dew
Background to digital ID legislation - a secret "call for evidence" in 2019 where "you told us you wanted the government to take a lead role in developing the UK’s digital identity economy. You wanted to see us create a clear framework that enables businesses to innovate. You wanted us to enable individuals to access the products and services they want with ease, confident that they are protected from fraud and that …
Signed Mina Dew
https://open.substack.com/pub/igorchudov/p/first-ever-official-apology-for-covid?r=raq7r&utm_medium=ios&utm_campaign=post
Signed Mina Dew
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @OutMedMan. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 1,082,188 of 1,183,361entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@OutMedMan named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Outlaw Medical Mandates” (@OutMedMan), 236 subscribers as measured 7 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/OutMedMan.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.