Channel
@pandata19
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
6,784subscribers
-19 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001269452782 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @pandata19 |
| Created | 7 December 2020 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 5 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/pandata19 |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 13:44 | 6,784 | -10 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 20:11 | 6,794 | -5 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 03:42 | 6,799 | -4 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 10:21 | 6,803 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 09:53 | 6,803 | first reading |
16 posts held, back to 7 November 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 10 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 16 posts for this entry, the most recent from 17 November 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
831 reactions across 16 posts, in 15 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 39.5% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 328 | 39.5% | |
| 💯 | 268 | 32.3% | |
| ❤ | 107 | 12.9% | |
| 🔥 | 38 | 4.57% | |
| 😈 | 23 | 2.77% | |
| 🖕 | 20 | 2.41% | |
| 🤡 | 10 | 1.20% | |
| 🤣 | 8 | 0.963% | |
| ❤🔥 | 7 | 0.842% | |
| 👏 | 7 | 0.842% | |
| 👌 | 5 | 0.602% | |
| 🤬 | 4 | 0.481% | |
| 👎 | 3 | 0.361% | |
| 🤔 | 2 | 0.241% | |
| 🤝 | 1 | 0.12% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 16 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 831reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 7 November 2024 to 17 November 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Since the covid phenomenon began, many have perceived that democracy is illusory, and that the system operating under its banner is set upon a trajectory that citizens neither aspire to nor expect. But were we naïve to expect anything else? https://rumble.com/v71ti1s-thoughts-on-the-unravelling-of-democracy-part-1.html?mref=umbzp&mc=dprv6
👍26💯11❤8🤝1
22 September 2025 Public Participation Guidelines – Notice 3415 of 2025 The South African Parents’ Action Coalition has prepared guidelines for public commentary on Regulation 14 in Notice 3415 of 2025, which requires immunisation of children for admission to public schools. We note that standard form letters are being circulated for use as individual submissions. Using such a letter verbatim is strongly discourage…
❤16👍11
"Covid was only contagious in the sense that lies spread." ~ Nick Hudson
💯110👍26🔥8❤7👌5👎3
Free event this Thursday. Sign up to get your space. Be part of the conversation around how to free your mind, why thinking critically is crucial for a flourishing society, and what a flourishing society might look like. https://www.weareelevate.org/thinkingsociety?via=sinead
❤11👍4
Teachers must do all they can to avert an AI-facilitated intellectual dark age AI could replace teachers, one entrepreneur cheerfully predicts. Does he underestimate the risks of AI for the learning process? Yes. Here's why... (from David Thunder's Freedom Blog) AI could replace teachers, says an influential entrepreneur in a Youtube interview. He’s all for freedom but seemingly unbothered by machines teaching kid…
👍35💯21❤3👏1
How “Adolescence” offers us a peek inside the machine I wrote about Adolescence – or rather the (manufactured) hype surrounding it – last week. I thought at the time I’d said all that needed to be said. It is just some Netflix show, after all. But then the hype keeps going, and the messaging piles up, and you realize it’s actually a really neat case study in The Way Things Work. As a quick catch-up for the fortuna…
👍14❤4🤔2
The CEO of Gab, Andrew Torba, announced that: The UK Government has demanded that Gab submit to their new censorship regime under the UK Online Safety Act, threatening massive fines (18 million euros or 10% of our annual revenue) for not policing speech. We will not comply. We will not pay one cent. We will defend our UK users' right to speak freely and reject any law that compels censorship. Their letter and the r…
👍45❤20👏6🔥5
"...the target is “latent TB” – which is not symptomatic, it’s not infectious, and doesn’t progress unless the person is immunocompromised. So of course, we need mass vaccination." https://pandata.org/the-biopharma-industrial-complex-making-up-new-indications-out-of-thin-air/
🖕20🤣8👍1
"In an era dominated by rapid communication and fleeting interactions, the need for thoughtful engagement has never been more pressing. The pace of modern life often leaves little room for careful reflection, critical thinking, and meaningful dialogue. To build a society that values understanding, diversity, and genuine connection, we must intentionally slow down our conversations and create spaces for civil discours…
❤24👍8
"We fell into that trap because we failed to grasp both the circularity of test development, and the fact that it was predicated on a contrived sequence." https://pandata.org/novelty-and-immunity-why-were-we-so-blind/
🔥15👍5
Short, sweet, and significant. https://sanityunleashed.substack.com/p/remember-the-absurd-videos-of-people
👍31🔥2❤1
Sustainability "A way to put a price on everything; water, air, every tree, every blade of grass. Nothing to do with protecting the environment, all about making a profit on every single atom present on the planet."
💯126👍20❤3🔥2
Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @pandata19. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 866,119 of 1,336,469entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@pandata19 named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“PANDA | Science. Sense. Society.” (@pandata19), 6,784 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/pandata19.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.