Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

TAP Coffs Harbour

@TAPCoffsHarbour

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

510subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001531167531
TypeChannel
Username@TAPCoffsHarbour
DescriptionConnection our Community https://theaustraliaproject.org https://www.tapcoffsharbour.com
CreatedBetween 1 August 2021 and 28 February 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/TAPCoffsHarbour

Growth

5107 Aug 2026, 01:34 — 510 subscribers7 Aug 2026, 01:47 — 510 subscribers7 Aug 2026, 01:347 Aug 2026, 01:47
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 509–511 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
7 Aug 2026, 01:47510no change
7 Aug 2026, 01:34510first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 9 December 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 22 March 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Photos
163
Videos
21
Links
250

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 7 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

6 reactions across 3 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 66.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
466.7%
👍233.3%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 4 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 6reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 9 December 2025 to 22 March 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

22 Mar 2026, 01:02 UTC290 viewsread 7 August 2026

https://open.substack.com/pub/ianbrighthope/p/i-was-abandoned-the-reckoning?utm_campaign=post&utm_medium=email

Signed George Christinson

20 Mar 2026, 04:26 UTC176 views0 reactionsread 7 August 2026

### A Nation Reimagined — Sovereignty, Health, and the Reclaiming of the People There are moments in history when a society is compelled to pause—not by choice, but by consequence—and ask itself a question both simple and profound: “Who are we, and who do we serve?” It is in such moments that the architecture of governance, long assumed to be stable, reveals its fractures. Institutions once trusted begin to appear d

Signed George Christinson

20 Mar 2026, 04:26 UTC218 viewsread 7 August 2026

Yet the critique extended beyond the immediate circumstances of the pandemic. It reached into the deeper structure of the healthcare system itself. What we have constructed, it was argued, is not a health system, but a disease management system—one that excels in intervention, yet falters in prevention. We have become adept at placing ambulances at the bottom of the cliff, while neglecting to build the fence at the t

Signed George Christinson

20 Mar 2026, 04:26 UTC307 viewsread 7 August 2026

Such proposals, of course, are ambitious. They require not only technical feasibility, but political will, public engagement, and careful transition planning. The speakers were clear that this is not a project for immediate execution, but for deliberate development. A multi-year process, involving consultation, research, and democratic endorsement, is envisaged. Central to this process is the creation of an independ

Signed George Christinson

19 Mar 2026, 23:50 UTC160 viewsread 7 August 2026

Those councillors who support the developers in the Jetty Foreshores plan spent a lot of time at last night’s meeting trying to discredit the poll which showed that 68.8% of the voting community rejected the government plan. They put forward a number of flimsy reasons why the vote shouldn’t be recognised but the one thing they won’t talk about or allow debate about is the result 68.8% a landslide in any calculation.

Signed George Christinson

19 Mar 2026, 20:08 UTC164 viewsread 7 August 2026

Further to my comments regarding last night's council meeting, it now seems that the council has a new rule that allows a councillor to move that a motion which has been moved by another councillor be put to the vote. This means that the original motion has to be put to the vote without debate. This is the tactic that the gang of five used at last night's meeting to stifle debate on the Jetty Foreshores. All of this

Signed George Christinson

19 Mar 2026, 08:46 UTC160 viewsread 7 August 2026

For some years now I have been observing the slow demise of democracy, sadly tonight at the Coffs Harbour City council meeting I witnessed its death. It didn’t just die, it was executed by the gang of five within the council. We heard intelligent and impassioned presentations by councillors Judge and Cassell in support of the people of Coffs Harbour regarding the NSW government’s Jetty Foreshores redevelopment proje

Signed George Christinson

18 Mar 2026, 19:36 UTC129 viewsread 7 August 2026

https://open.substack.com/pub/lovebrook/p/i-thought-it-would-be-really-easy?utm_campaign=post-expanded-share&utm_medium=web

Signed George Christinson

17 Mar 2026, 22:40 UTC138 viewsread 7 August 2026

Dear Mayor Williams, With respect, I’m writing to you concerning the proposed redevelopment of the Jetty Foreshores by the NSW government which your council is supporting. I want to start by reminding you of the opening paragraph of the Australian Constitution which says: WHEREAS the people of New South Wales …………….. This is a clear indication that it is the people of this country who control what happens in it an

Signed George Christinson

17 Mar 2026, 09:45 UTC122 views3 reactionsread 7 August 2026

I attended the public forum at the council chambers tonight and was very impressed with the presentations by Bruce Weir and Garth MacIlvray who spoke passionately on behalf of the people of Coffs Harbour regarding the redevelopment of the Jetty Foreshores. Despite the fact that 68% of the electors of Coffs Harbour voted NO to the Government's plan and 61% of responders to the government’s call for responses from the

2👍1

Signed George Christinson

9 Mar 2026, 04:21 UTC147 viewsread 7 August 2026

https://johnanderson.net.au/why-the-west-condemns-israel-but-ignores-iranians-brendan-oneill/

Signed George Christinson

21 Feb 2026, 02:46 UTC220 viewsread 7 August 2026

https://youtu.be/2Z06n-4ircs?si=UKMeuFtrczuhpiYu

Signed George Christinson

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @TAPCoffsHarbour. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 704,611 of 1,345,403entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“TAP Coffs Harbour” (@TAPCoffsHarbour), 510 subscribers as measured 7 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/TAPCoffsHarbour.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.