Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 48% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Observations
These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.
Content that also appears on other registered channels
Posts published here appear in near-verbatim form on 1 other registered channel. This entry also forms a group of 2 channels linked by matching posts. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.
Matching posts — open both and compare (5 of the pairs behind the counts below)
Channels this entry shares post bodies with, where at least one matching post pair has no forward credit between the two channels, or to a common source, recorded in our data
Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.
What this cannot establish
MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.
Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. None of the 0 matches recorded here fall after that date, so for this entry we cannot say whether any of them carried a credit. The duplication is measured; the absence of attribution is not.
“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 10 comparable posts for this entry, running 6 March 2026 to 11 July 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.
The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.
Verbatim republication has three causes and the text separates only two: a clone/mirror, unattributed copy-paste, or BOTH channels copying a common third source that neither attributes. The spread filter (content held by at most 8 channels) reduces the third and does not remove it.
'Earliest' means earliest IN THIS CORPUS. A channel ingested one page deep will look younger than a neighbour ingested in full; corpus_coverage above is there to be checked before the direction is believed.
shared_verified_est extrapolates the sampled pass rate over the full narrow match count; sampled/passed are the numbers actually measured.
Absence of a forward header is not proof of intent: Telegram lets a channel disable forward attribution, and a credit written in the body is not parsed as attribution here (mention_edge_either_way above is the closest available signal).
Of the group of 2 channels, the one whose matching posts we hold earliest is @crypto_azam — which is this entry. That is a statement about our reading window, not a claim of authorship.
Recorded under the key clone_source, last confirmed 8 August 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.
Channels linked by matching posts
This channel is in a group of 2 registered channels linked by matching posts. Links are found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register.
Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown in this list. “First” could only mean first in our own crawl, which depends on how deep we happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. Our one hand-check read 45 of the highest-confidence flagged pairs against the live Telegram pages. In 18 of them the live page showed a “Forwarded from” credit that our database had no record of, so reading that pair as an unattributed copy was wrong; the check did not measure who published first. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Near-verbatim matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.
66 measurements spanning 96 days, net -13,539. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 123,610–141,211 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 66
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
10 Nov 2026, 02:56
125,641
-193
8 Nov 2026, 20:44
125,834
-216
7 Nov 2026, 13:46
126,050
-141
6 Nov 2026, 12:01
126,191
-135
5 Nov 2026, 12:36
126,326
-111
4 Nov 2026, 15:37
126,437
-81
3 Nov 2026, 14:07
126,518
-105
2 Nov 2026, 12:38
126,623
-139
1 Nov 2026, 09:24
126,762
-91
31 Oct 2026, 11:27
126,853
-123
30 Oct 2026, 12:06
126,976
-149
29 Oct 2026, 14:14
127,125
-138
28 Oct 2026, 13:36
127,263
-149
27 Oct 2026, 11:36
127,412
-160
26 Oct 2026, 12:30
127,572
-61
25 Oct 2026, 14:27
127,633
-24
24 Oct 2026, 17:06
127,657
-125
23 Oct 2026, 16:36
127,782
-165
22 Oct 2026, 17:21
127,947
-144
21 Oct 2026, 11:58
128,091
first reading
Engagement
88 posts held, back to 6 March 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 201 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
5.04%
avg views ÷ 125,641 subscribers
Avg views / post
6,330
19 posts measured
Reaction rate
—
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
20
of 88 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 9 November 2026
Posts held
88 (6 March 2026 – 9 November 2026)
Views total
120,230
Reactions total
—
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
10 Nov 2026, 21:38 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈4,630
Videos
≈780
Links
≈5,560
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 10 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
59s
Average length
20s
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Advertising
Ad load
4.55%
4 of 88 posts carry an ad marker
Regulatory tokens
0
none — marked by hashtag only
Median views · ads
2,230
over 4 measured posts
Median views · rest
7,910
over 80 measured posts
An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.
This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor. A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.
Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.
Measured over the 88 most recent posts we hold, published 6 March 2026 to 9 November 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 3 of 20 posts held from the last 30 days (15.0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
2026 год не простит ошибок тем, кто покупает биткоин и эфир
Пока новички скупают BTC и ждут, когда он вырастет на 15-20%, профи ищут так называемые «асимметричные сделки». Это когда ты рискуешь $100, чтобы забрать $3000-$5000.
В тяжелых монетах из ТОП-10 такой математики давно нет. Зато на альтах с небольшой капитализацией она работает каждый день. Именно поэтому стоит читать канал Взгляд Фролова.
Автор находит мо…
Crypto | Azam pinned «У кого есть свободные 8.3 млн $, можем заработать 5 млн$ за 3 месяца Сделка по купле и продаже серверов Nvidia B300 Продавец официальный дистрибьютер Покупатель российский техногигант Напрямую они работать не могут( санкции) Полная юридическая безопасность…»
У кого есть свободные 8.3 млн $, можем заработать 5 млн$ за 3 месяца
Сделка по купле и продаже серверов Nvidia B300
Продавец официальный дистрибьютер
Покупатель российский техногигант
Напрямую они работать не могут( санкции)
Полная юридическая безопасность
@Baycpaycom
Даю каждому доступ в новый вип канал, но в отличии от других каналов, доступ в него будет полностью бесплатный. 🎉
С одним правилом - вступить в канал можно будет только первым 2300 человек.
Заходите: https://t.me/+VlZD1ZIpffM0YWMy
P.S. Если ссылка еще активна, значит вы успеваете
#РЕКЛАМА
Сейчас с Binance идёт активный отток ликвы: за последние 2–3 дня вывели уже $14 млрд.
Возможно, на панике проливов часть средств пойдёт в стакан на дексы, поэтому трекайте цены — с большой вероятностью может быть много сетапов для спредов.
Ну а с самими оттоками панику тут разгонять смысла нету: всё равно через время большая часть этой ликвы вернётся — так действует психология.
🚨СРОЧНО!
Для всех подписчиков, открывается доступ в приватный канал. До утра вход будет бесплатный для всех после чего станет платным за $2500.
Желающих получить качественные сигналы много, но для вас бесплатный доступ до утра.
Успейте - https://t.me/+KmPO1pX2wOkyMzhk
Сейчас, чтобы попасть в приватку достаточно только перейти по ссылке и подать заявку.
#реклама
Showing the 12 most recent of 88 posts we hold for @crypto_azam. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts recorded as deleted after publishing
We recorded 6 posts on @crypto_azam as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.
A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.
First seen missing
9 August 2026
Most recent seen missing
16 October 2026
Median time before seen missing
35 hours
Seen missing in the last 30 days
3
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
INVEST ZONE | Khairullin Ruslan @invest_zonaa · 848,307#1
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 13 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Trade by Booba @trade_by_booba · 49,723 Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 25 August 2026
КИТЫ Инвестиций🐋 @kitinvest · 28,407 Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 9 September 2026
Maloletoff | Crypto-Angel @maloletoffcrypto · 44,823 Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 27 August 2026
DAO KONDR VC - Биткоин / криптовалюта / блокчейн @daokondrvcru · 25,585 Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 13 September 2026
Сергей Сергиенко @sergeisergienko · 60,345 Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 21 August 2026
ТЕЛЕБЛОГ Бизнес / Инвестиции Биткоин Криптовалюты Банки Россия трейдинг новости реклама афиша объявления @crypto_telegramer · 20,998 Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 25 September 2026
Дмитрий Кокорев | Инвестиции @kokorevinvest · 104,981 Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 20 August 2026
Dashi Finance @dashi_finance · 33,147 Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 3 September 2026
МАТЕШЕВ | Мастерская Трейдинга @masterskay_mateshev · 21,620 Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 20 September 2026
Crypto Falcon @falconinvestors · 83,228 Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 18 August 2026
ARUT NEWS @arutnews · 27,578 Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 8 September 2026
Мус и Крипта @mus_money_official · 49,173 Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 3 September 2026
Опять Крипта @okcrypta1 · 41,250 Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 29 August 2026
Дмитрий Ткачев| Эксперт криптовалют @dimatkachevv · 34,038 Telegram ranks this channel #32 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 3 September 2026
Олег Артемьев | Ленивый инвестор @ne_investor · 182,798 Telegram ranks this channel #34 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 12 August 2026
CRYPTO GUYS 👽| 😼 @TonGuysNFT · 26,977 Telegram ranks this channel #36 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 11 September 2026
Мир без границ с Кондрашовым @kondrworld · 52,893 Telegram ranks this channel #36 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 23 August 2026
🍓 Ягодка 🍓 @kriptodima1 · 9 Telegram ranks this channel #37 of 62 here — alongside 61 others — read 29 September 2026
Кошелек с Биткоинами | Алексей Чечукевич @wallet_with_bitcoins · 85,381 Telegram ranks this channel #37 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 17 August 2026
Arnold @ArnoldCrypto · 60 Telegram ranks this channel #38 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 5 September 2026
Кресло с подогревом @kreslospodogrevom · 27,787 Telegram ranks this channel #41 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 8 September 2026
ПОЛУНИН @polunintrade7 · 486,770 Telegram ranks this channel #42 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 9 August 2026
РОМАНОВИЧ @romanovich_ser · 37,598 Telegram ranks this channel #44 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 31 August 2026
10 долларов Баффетта @buff_10 · 59,290 Telegram ranks this channel #45 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 22 August 2026
This channel appears in 40 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 November 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Crypto | Azam” (@crypto_azam), 125,641 subscribers as measured 10 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/crypto_azam.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
