✌️Запити:
t.me/PromotionCryptoBot
⚡️Криптовалюта разом з Трухою
🚀 Актуальні новини у світі криптовалют
Довідка для зв’язних слів:
https://t.me/+PYhyyBURrjA5YWIy
Created
16 May 2022 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
8 measurements spanning 7 days, net -130. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 65,964–66,165 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
12 Aug 2026, 18:38
66,012
-17
11 Aug 2026, 15:22
66,029
+42
10 Aug 2026, 11:52
65,987
-34
9 Aug 2026, 10:11
66,021
-38
8 Aug 2026, 12:32
66,059
-53
7 Aug 2026, 12:01
66,112
-27
6 Aug 2026, 15:07
66,139
-3
6 Aug 2026, 03:15
66,142
first reading
Engagement
62 posts held, back to 3 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 17 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
7.47%
avg views ÷ 66,012 subscribers
Avg views / post
4,930
62 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.557%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
62
of 62 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 61 of 62 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 August 2026
Posts held
62 (3 August 2026 – 12 August 2026)
Views total
305,830
Reactions total
1,675
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
12 Aug 2026, 19:12 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈10,300
Videos
≈866
Links
≈11,300
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Reaction mix
1,477 reactions across 52 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 37.5% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
👍
554
37.5%
🤣
354
24.0%
❤
315
21.3%
🤬
165
11.2%
🔥
62
4.20%
👏
22
1.49%
☃
3
0.203%
🎅
2
0.135%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 61 of the 62 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,675reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 62 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 12 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
6
across the posts below
Posts paid on
4
of 62 we hold a reading for · 6%
Most on one post
3
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @cryptotruexa. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 62 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 3 August 2026 to 12 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
⚡️«Схема» Трампа накрылась?
Речь идет о сервисе «Truth API), который предоставлял платный сверхбыстрый доступ к постам десяти самых влиятельных аккаунтов на Truth Social.
За $1.2 млн в год трейдеры и хедж-фонды начали получать посты на миллисекунды раньше остальных⏱
Однако сегодня The Intercept и Freedom of the Press Foundation подали в суд на Трампа за продажу такого доступа.
Истцы называют схему «планом вымогат…
👀Solana была близка к выходу из строя.
Сбой маршрутизации у инфраструктурного провайдера Teraswitch спровоцировал одновременный уход в офлайн 90 валидаторов, на которых находилось 28.83% всех застейканных SOL.
Отмечу, что критический порог для потери консенсуса Solana составляет 33.3%.
То есть, сеть достигла 86% от того уровня, когда блокчейн теряет возможность финализировать транзакции.
Один сбой способен выбить…
📣Инфляция в США согласно ожиданиям.
Сегодня были опубликованы данные по индексу потребительских цен (ИПЦ) США:
Предыдущий — 3.5%;
Ожидание — 3.4%;
Фактический — 3.4%.
Вряд ли крипторынок серьезно отреагирует на эти данные. Будем искать сигналы в риторике Кевина Уорша.
Локально биткоин реагирует падением📉
Труха ⚡️Crypto
Присоединяйся к ЧАТУ
👀Трамп раздумывает над снижением налогов?
Дональд Трамп изучает возможность снижения налога на прирост капитала в США, — Bloomberg.
Данные изменения могут затронуть и прибыль американских инвесторов от продажи криптовалюты, что позитивно повлияет на рынок🐂
Тем не менее, инициатива находится лишь на стадии обсуждения.
Труха ⚡️Crypto
Присоединяйся к ЧАТУ
🔥6084 икса на ETH.
OG-кит ETH заработал $5.05 млн с $830 за одну сделку.
В 2015 году он получил с пресейла Ethereum аж 2680 ETH, только сегодня переместив активы на новые кошельки.
Удивительно, что не продал часть активов раньше👀
Труха ⚡️Crypto
Присоединяйся к ЧАТУ
🔎 Обзор рынка 12.08
Большая часть крипторынка торгуется в зелёной зоне🔼
Bitcoin (BTC) $63,572 (-0.45%);
Ethereum (ETH) $1884 (+0.71%);
Solana (SOL) $76.04 (+0.32%);
BNB (BNB) $610.44 (+1.96%).
Рыночная капитализация: $2.26 трлн (+0.06%).
Доминация BTC: 59.04% (+0.08%).
Индекс страха и жадности: 37 (страх);
Индекс альтсезона: 50.
Объём торгов BTC — $21.6 млрд.
Совокупный открытый интерес — $46.9 млрд.
Труха ⚡️Cry…
📌Strategy вернется к покупкам BTC.
CEO Strategy отметил, что компания вернется к активным покупкам биткоина в течение этого года🗓
Несмотря на остывшую динамику в последнее время, компания за этот год купила 175,000 BTC, а продала лишь 7,000 BTC.
Также CEO компании заявил, что биткоин уже восьмой месяц находится в медвежке, а у компании Strategy нет финансовых проблем.
Труха ⚡️Crypto
Присоединяйся к ЧАТУ
⚡️Сложность майнинга BTC упала.
Сложность майнинга BTC упала на 18.5% от пикового значения — крупнейшее снижение со времен запрета майнинга в Китае в 2021 году.
Возможно, часть майнеров отключили оборудование из-за падения прибыльности, что потенциально может склонять их к продаже запасов BTC🏷
Труха ⚡️Crypto
Присоединяйся к ЧАТУ
📣Новые правила для криптобизнеса от SEC.
14 августа в SEC рассмотрят первый крупный свод правил, разработанный специально для крипторынка — «Regulation Crypto».
Это может создать отдельный режим привлечения капитала для криптокомпаний, который позволит в определенных случаях обходиться без стандартной регистрации предложения ценных бумаг в SEC.
Продвижение в этом вопросе можете стать позитивным триггером для крипт…
🐻Спрос на ETH слабеет.
Общий спотовый спрос на ETH ослабевает, — отмечают аналитики.
Если покупатели не вмешаются, ETH может уйти на коррекцию📉
Труха ⚡️Crypto
Присоединяйся к ЧАТУ
❌Биржа BitMart неплатежеспособна.
CEO маркетмейкера (ММ) OpenGradient отмечает, что деньги ММ застряли на BitMart и их невозможно вывести.
Причиной являются проблемы с платежеспособностью биржи.
Ждём новую волну FUD?🤬
Труха ⚡️Crypto
Присоединяйся к ЧАТУ
🔎 Обзор рынка 11.08
Большая часть крипторынка торгуется в красной зоне🔽
Bitcoin (BTC) $63,948 (-1.84%);
Ethereum (ETH) $1872 (-2.71%);
Solana (SOL) $75.89 (-1.24%);
BNB (BNB) $599.65 (-0.59%).
Рыночная капитализация: $2.27 трлн (-0.47%).
Доминация BTC: 59.23% (-0.03%).
Индекс страха и жадности: 37 (страх);
Индекс альтсезона: 53.
Объём торгов BTC — $21.7 млрд.
Совокупный открытый интерес — $46.6 млрд.
Труха ⚡️Cry…
👍5🤬3❤2🔥1
Showing the 12 most recent of 62 posts we hold for @cryptotruexa. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Posts edited after publishing
@cryptotruexa edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
8 August 2026
Most recent edit
8 August 2026
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 779,132 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Труха⚡️Харків | Новини @truexakharkiv · 576,666 Telegram ranks this channel #63 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 9 August 2026
Труха⚡️Україна @truexanewsua · 3,167,312 Telegram ranks this channel #67 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 7 August 2026
Труха⚡️Кропивницький @truexakropivnicky · 174,361 Telegram ranks this channel #74 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 12 August 2026
Тернопіль⚡️Труха @ternopiltruexa · 154,238 Telegram ranks this channel #75 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 12 August 2026
Харківський Саньок @Sanek_Kharkiv · 155,764 Telegram ranks this channel #75 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 12 August 2026
Труха⚡️Черкаси @truexacherkasi · 168,090 Telegram ranks this channel #75 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 12 August 2026
Труха⚡️Київ @truexakyiv · 887,648 Telegram ranks this channel #75 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 8 August 2026
Труха⚡️Вінниця | Новини @vinnicatruexa · 186,324 Telegram ranks this channel #79 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 11 August 2026
Труха⚡️Полтава @truexapoltava · 297,104 Telegram ranks this channel #80 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 10 August 2026
Труха⚡️Одеса | Новини @odesatruexa · 250,155 Telegram ranks this channel #81 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 10 August 2026
ПУЛЬС | Новини України 🇺🇦 @novyny_puls · 153,630 Telegram ranks this channel #82 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 12 August 2026
Труха⚡️Львів @lvivtruexa · 321,360 Telegram ranks this channel #82 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 10 August 2026
Батальйон «Монако» | Україна | Новини @batalionmonako · 716,693 Telegram ranks this channel #82 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 8 August 2026
Адвокат Мілер @advokatmillerua · 192,424 Telegram ranks this channel #85 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 11 August 2026
Всевидящее ОКО 18 ✙ @oko18_ukr · 307,382 Telegram ranks this channel #85 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 10 August 2026
Тарас Юрист Адвокат Одесса @TarasOdessa · 144,670 Telegram ranks this channel #89 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 13 August 2026
This channel appears in 16 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Domains linked from posts
8 domainsthis channel’s own posts have linked to, measured by scanning the post bodies themselves — not the channel’s description, which is the separate Declared links section below when this entry has one. Appearing here is not a claim about who runs the linked site or why the channel linked to it; an advertisement, a news citation and a malicious link all leave the same kind of row.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Труха ⚡️Crypto” (@cryptotruexa), 66,012 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/cryptotruexa.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.