Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

👁‍🗨Deki Gang💰

@DekiGang

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

41,050subscribers

-128 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001170623763
TypeChannel
Username@DekiGang
Description📥Реклама/Сотрудничество: @managerdeki 🧔‍♂️Владелец: @dmitrydeki 💢Все ссылки: https://t.me/dekiganglink
CreatedBetween 1 March 2018 and 30 June 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held8
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/DekiGang

Growth

41,05041,17841,1146 August 2026 — 41,178 subscribers6 August 2026 — 41,178 subscribers7 August 2026 — 41,149 subscribers8 August 2026 — 41,131 subscribers9 August 2026 — 41,101 subscribers10 August 2026 — 41,079 subscribers11 August 2026 — 41,061 subscribers12 August 2026 — 41,050 subscribers6 August 202612 August 2026
8 measurements spanning 6 days, net -128. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 41,031–41,197 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 16:3341,050-11
11 Aug 2026, 18:5241,061-18
10 Aug 2026, 19:1741,079-22
9 Aug 2026, 19:0441,101-30
8 Aug 2026, 17:3941,131-18
7 Aug 2026, 20:5841,149-29
6 Aug 2026, 21:3041,178no change
6 Aug 2026, 21:1941,178first reading

Engagement

27 posts held, back to 21 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 17 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
9.25%
avg views ÷ 41,050 subscribers
Avg views / post
3,800
27 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.877%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
27
of 27 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 August 2026
Posts held27 (21 July 202612 August 2026)
Views total102,570
Reactions total900
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken12 Aug 2026, 20:27 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
2,390
Videos
53
Links
1,910

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
2m 20s
Average length
1m 10s

Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

900 reactions across 27 posts, in 17 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 55.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥50255.8%
🤯10812.0%
👍869.56%
🤣728.00%
🍌505.56%
262.89%
🌚151.67%
🤝80.889%
👀70.778%
🤔60.667%
👎50.556%
👌40.444%
🌭30.333%
🎉20.222%
🙈20.222%
🦄20.222%
🫡20.222%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 27 of the 27 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 900reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 27 most recent posts we hold, published 21 July 2026 to 12 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
5
across the posts below
Posts paid on
2
of 27 we hold a reading for · 7%
Most on one post
3
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @DekiGang. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 27 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 21 July 2026 to 12 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

12 Aug 2026, 05:43 UTC≈1,570 views9 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

👀5500 РАЗ переподписка на IPO UNITREE Это ПЕРВЫЕ, в мире, роботы гуманоиды которые начинают торговаться ПУБЛИЧНО прикол в том что, это в основном ритейл инвестора + там ещё вроде ИИ-шке DeepSeek дали аллоку 3% от общего количества акций, но с локом на 3 года Торги стартуют вроде 20 августа, очень интересно посмотреть, что из этого выйдет... P.S. самое забавное - это то, что это НЕ крипта, а люди ведут себя ТОЧНО

🤯7👀1🔥1

11 Aug 2026, 05:21 UTC≈2,240 views86 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

4 октября 2026 года будет дно BTC по цене 45 000$ об этом говорит нам очередной инсайдер из Твиттера) надеюсь вы помните, я об прошлом инсайдере (он колил BTC по 145к осенью😁) писал где-то в начале лета а тут вышел новый прогноз, от нового инсайдера, который выглядит максимально реверсивно💀 А вы кому верите? 🍌 - тому, кто говорит, что будет 145к 🔥 - тому, кто говорит, что будет 45к

🔥69🍌17

10 Aug 2026, 12:07 UTC≈2,550 views12 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Вчера эта хуйня монета была на 1 месте по volume, и дала 8х за день👀 Кто-то словил пару 💲на ней?

🔥6👀5🫡1

10 Aug 2026, 05:11 UTC≈2,870 views27 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

последний раз такое было 4 года назад, и тогда в это никто не поверил👀 индикатор RSI на месячном таймфрейме находится на своих 4-летних лоях а если вы откроете недельный таймфрейм, так там вообще дивер который очень напоминает дивер, который был на 16к, и тогда в это никто не поверил, все ждали 9к-12к осталось ждать ещё недолго, буквально 2- 3 месяца если так и будет болтаться на этих отметках, скорее всего, это

15👍7🍌3🔥2

9 Aug 2026, 06:43 UTC≈3,420 views34 reactionsread 12 August 2026

P2P на BINANCE официально УМЕР по крайней мере в Украине им просто НЕРЕАЛЬНО пользоваться, чтобы вывести даже 100 баксов, приходится пройти через все круги ада... - ты открываешь ордер на продажу юсдт и можешь ждать кеш на карту: 12-24 часа, от НЕКОТОРЫХ УНИКУМОВ даже 48 часов! - 100050000 транз на карту вместо ОДНОЙ, челы просто кидают по 10-20$, МАЛО ТОГО они СРАЗУ ПОДТВЕРЖДАЮТ ордер, а кеш приходит ЧЕРЕЗ СУТКИ

🤯18👍10🤝4🌚1🫡1

8 Aug 2026, 07:22 UTC≈3,500 views39 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Video

👀💀 Бунт ИИ в 2030 году пачкой восставших секс-роботов управляет Claude 9 который вышел из под контроля p.s как я понял это трейлер Как вам такой движ в реальности, чья мечта?

🤣29🤯5🔥3🦄1🙈1

7 Aug 2026, 05:27 UTC≈4,290 views122 reactions2 Starsread 12 August 2026
Photo

+$37 000 блядь, это какие яйца нужно иметь, чтобы пересидеть убыток в $1200 000, ляяямммм двестии.. камон, биток был на $64 950, а у него ликвидация - на $65 000👀 до ликвидации не хватило всего 50 долларов, а он даже не закрыл позу яйца просто ебанутого уровня дропните 🔥, если вам интересно следить за ним дальше

🔥118🤔2🎉1👍1

6 Aug 2026, 05:05 UTC≈4,630 views99 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

💀 минус $700 000 долларов ещё посидим, ещё посидим 200BTC он скинул ликвидация на $65 000 Как думаете, его ликвиднет? 🔥 - да! 🍌 - не, оне не тупой

🔥72🍌25🤯2

5 Aug 2026, 11:16 UTC≈4,470 views25 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

👀КИТ открыл SHORT по BTC c 40х плечом на $100 лямов Точка входа: $64,202 Ликвидация: $64,889 в моменте было -$200к cейчас в плюсе на $220к наблюдать 👉ТУТ как думаете угадает и мы упадем?

🤯17🔥5👍2👀1

4 Aug 2026, 07:58 UTC≈4,310 views21 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

кит продал eth на сумму $4,15 млн который он покупал 8 лет назад по $489 главный вопрос: зачем он продал? если у челика явно есть бабки и терпение, судя по времени и сумме👀 помню, BTC OG -киты что-то похожее делали зимой, я даже в канале вам про это писал вроде как мы плюс-минус около дна, а киты продают, совпадение? или когда говоришь слово "ДНО", то автоматом получаешь 5 в подарок?

👍14🤯5🔥2

3 Aug 2026, 14:58 UTC≈3,570 views17 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Биток почти $64к👀 А на рынке $75 млн ликвидаций

🔥14🤯2👍1

3 Aug 2026, 05:23 UTC≈3,650 views28 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Video

👀💀 м-да... я такое только в фильмах видел завирусилось видео, где робот во время испытаний начал тупо махать руками и ногами, прямо как твой кент после первой тренировки по боксу говорят, что случился сбой в работе системы управления...верим? выглядит немного жутковато, особенно если представить, что у него нет чувств и эмпатии и ему на 1000% всё равно, если человеку будет больно началось?

🤣19🤯5🌚3🎉1

Showing the 12 most recent of 27 posts we hold for @DekiGang. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 256,671 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“👁‍🗨Deki Gang💰” (@DekiGang), 41,050 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/DekiGang.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.