■ Доступні інвестиції від $100
■ Як не втратити капітал
■ Огляд платформ на власному досвіді
■ Куди влаштувати гривню
🌐 https://uainvest.com.ua
🔗 Useful links https://linktr.ee/ua_invest
Співпраця: @ua_investor
ДАО менеджер @khvostovoy
Created
Between 1 April 2019 and 30 September 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
11 measurements spanning 11 days, net +95. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 27,725–27,855 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
17 Aug 2026, 14:05
27,835
+5
16 Aug 2026, 06:23
27,830
-3
14 Aug 2026, 18:49
27,833
-7
13 Aug 2026, 11:26
27,840
+8
12 Aug 2026, 12:48
27,832
+13
11 Aug 2026, 11:33
27,819
-1
10 Aug 2026, 11:15
27,820
+30
9 Aug 2026, 07:54
27,790
+18
8 Aug 2026, 10:00
27,772
+16
7 Aug 2026, 12:41
27,756
+16
6 Aug 2026, 20:47
27,740
first reading
Engagement
18 posts held, back to 2 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 26 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
36.6%
avg views ÷ 27,835 subscribers
Avg views / post
10,200
1 post measured
Reaction rate
2.40%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
1
of 18 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 10 August 2026
Posts held
18 (2 May 2026 – 10 August 2026)
Views total
10,200
Reactions total
245
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
18 Aug 2026, 01:41 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈1,430
Videos
≈5
Links
≈1,150
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 18 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Reaction mix
3,254 reactions across 18 posts, in 24 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 39.5% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
👍
1,286
39.5%
🔥
694
21.3%
❤
326
10.0%
custom 5190784937212525576
315
9.68%
custom 5188551970830435480
299
9.19%
custom 5409019767484883461
144
4.43%
🙈
40
1.23%
🤝
31
0.953%
custom 5271998095855496593
30
0.922%
🤔
25
0.768%
🤯
13
0.4%
custom 5195032827371994836
11
0.338%
🙉
11
0.338%
😱
10
0.307%
✍
3
0.092%
💔
3
0.092%
🤓
3
0.092%
🐳
2
0.061%
👀
2
0.061%
👏
2
0.061%
4 further kinds
4
0.123%
Custom emoji. 5 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 3,254reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 2 May 2026 to 10 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
11
across the posts below
Posts paid on
7
of 18 we hold a reading for · 39%
Most on one post
3
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @ua_invest. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 18 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 2 May 2026 to 10 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
🏦 НБУ покращує умови для українців за кордоном і не тільки
Основні зміни:
+ Купівля валюти до 200 тис грн / міс (було 50)
+ Зняття готівки в Україні до 200 тис грн / день (було 100)
+ Розрахунки з гривневих карт за кордоном до 200 тис грн / міс (було 100)
+ ЗНОВУ МОЖЛИВІ SWIFT перекази в межах 200 тис грн / міс (з початком війни були обмеження)
+ Можна купувати іноземні цінні папери в межах ліміту 200 тис грн / міс…
💻 Результати SK Hynix
З 10 000 USDT дали алокацію на 3 000 USDT
+$280 з одного фул акаунту
#skhynix #listing #nasdaq
Проксі-15% | Сервіси | Закрита спільнота
💻 Купувати чи не купувати SK HYNIX до лістингу Nasdaq?
Контекст: SK Hynix - виробник модулів пам'яті для широкого кола девайсів: мобілки, пк, сервери, AI, DIY і т.д. Ключовий постачальник HBM-пам’яті, яка використовується у AI дата центрах. За останній рік акції компанії виросли на 636%. Торгується на корейській біржі. 10 липня лістинг на Nasdaq Global Select Market.
Upside 👍
• Великий попит на пам'ять у найближчі …
🛒 Розподіл алокації TokenSale QUID на Legion
Можна перевіряти алоку на Legion в сейл Squid. Хто просив 1к, дали на 500$
Понад $4.7M запрошено в $QUID на Legion.
TGE заплановано на Q3 2026
Премаркет на Aspecta близько $70 млн FDV, при тому, що сейл проводили при оцінці в $45 млн.
75% заявників отримали розподіл, де 89% заявників отримали принаймні свій мінімальний запит.
Офіційні критерії пропорції розподілу алок…
🟣 Менше двох годин до кінця TokenSale QUID на Kraken та Legion 🛒
Squid - це крос-ланцюгова платформа, яка надає доступ до 20 тис.+ токенів у 100+ блокчейнах. Sale проходить на 🤑 Kraken та 🛒 Legion.
Метрики
• Оцінка продажу: $45 млн FDV
• Hardcap: $2,25 млн (50 млн токенів за $0,045 — 5% пропозиції)
• Усі придбані токени будуть розблоковані на TGE (очікується Q3)
Деталі сейлу Kraken - Сума збору $1,125 млн. Попит з…
Bending Spoons IPO з оцінкою $19B норм чи не норм?
Італійська тех компанія, яка викуповує помираючі бізнеси в плані дохідності, зрізає кости (звільняє 50-70% працівників), допилює фічі, виправляє баги та піднімає ціни 😁. У портфелі Evernote, Vimeo, WeTransfer, AOL, Eventbrite, Brightcove, Remini, StreamYard та інші.
Інформація про IPO
• Лістинг: Nasdaq Global Select Market
• Тікер: BSP
• Ціна: $26 - 28
• Обсяг IPO:…
⚠️ Новий учасник списку бірж, які працюють за принципом казино — 🏦 BingX 🎰
Контекст: учасник нашої спільноти зайшов у декілька арбітражних угод із загальним обсягом позицій до 20 000 USDT. За його словами, після цього BingX анулювала PNL, тобто прибуток, який перелився на Bingx фактично залишився на стороні біржі.
Вишенка на торті. BingX у своїх публічних навчальних матеріалах прямо пояснює + пояснює #2, що таке ар…
🚀 Найбільше IPO у світі пройшло успішно.
SpaceX по $160+ та FDV понад $2 трлн — це справді потужно. Навіть занадто 😁
Абсолютно всі, хто брав участь у попередніх pre-IPO лаунчпадах, заробили.
На останніх сейлах криптобіржі спрацювали у своєму репертуарі: майже всім повідміняли алокації. Чесно кажучи, це мене не здивувало — лише вкотре підтвердило, що CEX особливо довіряти не варто.
Чи є сенс купувати акції на спот…
🚀 Беру участь у лаунчпаді SPACEX на MEXC
Це вже третій лаунчпад SPACEX від Mexc. Можемо отримати алокацію по фіксованій ціні 141,75$. На минулому викупали по 130$.
Фактично Mexc нам продає за формулою інших бірж = ціну базової пропозиції IPO 135$ + комісія брокера 5%.
Примітка. На лаунчпаді видадуть $SPCXX, що не є акцією $SPCX, але має привʼязку 1:1
На відміну від Bybit, якщо Маск 🩴запушить своє дитя на торгах, …
🚀 IPO SPACEX на Bybit
Вслід за Kraken 🤑 підтягнулася біржа 💰 Bybit, яка запускає платформу IPO Express, де можна буде претендувати на токенізовані акції (xStocks) компанії 🚀 SpaceX.
IPO для заможніх, бо тільки VIP 👴користувачі можуть взяти участь.
Індикативна ціна для цієї пропозиції становить 141,75$, що включає ціну базової пропозиції IPO 135$ та плату за андеррайтинг 5% = 6,75$.
⚠️ Якщо остаточна ціна перевищу…
🥼 LAB знову дає заробити?
У такому солодкому фандінгу завжди буде підвох = памп / дамп + ADL тому завжди дотримуйтеся ризик менеджменту:
1. низькі плечі
2. запас маржі
3. не більше 5% вашого депозиту у високо ризикові арбітражні зв'язки
💰 Посилання на джентельменский моніторинг
Фармите LAB?
Так - 🥼
Ні - 🇺🇦
#lab #arbitrage #funding
Проксі-15% | Сервіси | Закрита спільнота
Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @ua_invest. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 444,048 of 1,481,306entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Binance Новини @Binance_UA_official · 95,611 Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 16 August 2026
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Куди влаштувати гривню. Доступні інвестиції” (@ua_invest), 27,835 subscribers as measured 17 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ua_invest.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.