📉Технологічний сектор змістився на 5 сходинку в 2026. Попередньо перформанс техів утримував його на 1-2 сходинці.

Channel
TSTA | Markets 🇺🇦
@tstamarkets_ua
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
20,730subscribers
-212 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001810333522 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Usernames | @tstamarkets @tstamarkets_ua |
| Created | Between 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 5 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 63 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 5 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/tstamarkets_ua |
Topic
Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 62% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 5 Nov 2026, 19:09 | 20,730 | -16 |
| 4 Nov 2026, 15:28 | 20,746 | -2 |
| 3 Nov 2026, 15:11 | 20,748 | +4 |
| 2 Nov 2026, 17:16 | 20,744 | -9 |
| 1 Nov 2026, 13:56 | 20,753 | -4 |
| 31 Oct 2026, 14:37 | 20,757 | -3 |
| 30 Oct 2026, 17:38 | 20,760 | +16 |
| 29 Oct 2026, 20:49 | 20,744 | +5 |
| 28 Oct 2026, 18:27 | 20,739 | +20,729 |
| 28 Oct 2026, 04:17 | 10 | -20,730 |
| 27 Oct 2026, 21:27 | 20,740 | +3 |
| 26 Oct 2026, 20:17 | 20,737 | -8 |
| 25 Oct 2026, 21:05 | 20,745 | -3 |
| 24 Oct 2026, 21:44 | 20,748 | -5 |
| 23 Oct 2026, 18:37 | 20,753 | -5 |
| 21 Oct 2026, 16:17 | 20,758 | +5 |
| 20 Oct 2026, 14:38 | 20,753 | +20,744 |
| 20 Oct 2026, 07:49 | 9 | -20,746 |
| 19 Oct 2026, 11:20 | 20,755 | -5 |
| 18 Oct 2026, 09:55 | 20,760 | first reading |
Engagement
416 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 63 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 27.1%
- avg views ÷ 20,730 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 5,620
- 57 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 57
- of 416 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 November 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 416 (5 August 2026 – 5 November 2026) |
| Views total | 320,226 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 5 Nov 2026, 14:55 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Video runtime
- 1m 11s
- Average length
- 18s
Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 9 of 57 posts held from the last 30 days (15.8%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
👀Напівпровідники знову втрачають на відкритті основної сесії, фінансовий сектор продовжує формувати АТН.
🇬🇧 Банк Англії попереджає, що інфляція у UK може зрости до 6,2%, якщо конфлікт на Близькому Сході загостриться.
✅$NFLX відштохнувся на +10% з дна валюації за тиждень. 💻️Тепер подібна ситуація утворилася на $NVDA. Форвардний P/E 16.5х, найбільший дисконт останніх років.
🇬🇧 ЦБ UK підняв ставку на 25 б.п. вперше за три роки. Усі 9 учасників ЦБ проголосували за підвищення і ніхто не пропонував залишити ставку без змін.
😒 Близько тисячі своїх співробітників Anthropic перетворить у мультимільйонерів при оцінці у $2 трлн. Прогнозовані виплати залежно від року працевлаштування: • До 2023 року: 300–500 працівників отримають від $110 до $400+ млн. • 2024 рік: 440–640 осіб матимуть по $200–300 млн. • 2025 рік: близько 1360 співробітників — по $70–95 млн. • 2026 рік: близько 3000 людей отримають до $20 млн кожен.
📊Поточні ймовірності підвищення ставок ЦБ на наступному засіданні.
🎞Що буде з Іраном та Україною після виборів? Відповіді - у свіжому подкасті The Diary Of A CEO.
😄
Основні події на ринках сьогодні: 🔎 На що звернути увагу: 🇺🇸 Challenger Job Cuts - 12:30 - попередній показник: 43.2 тис. 🏦🇬🇧 BoE Interest Rate Decision - 14:00 - попередній показник: 3.75% 🇺🇸 Unemployment Claims - 15:30 - попередній показник: 194 тис. Показники: 🇦🇺 Trade Balance - 02:30 🇨🇭 Unemployment Rate - 10:30 🇪🇺 PPI - 12:00 🛢 Natural Gas Storage - 17:30 Аукціони: 🇯🇵 10y JGB - 05:35
😒Трамп визнав, що левова частка поразки республіканців формується від іранської війни, проте наполягає, що ця операція була необхідною задля уникнення ситуації, де Іран володів би ядерною зброєю. Щодо демократів він зазначив, що він «поладить» з ними, а іранська війна закінчиться «коли він вирішить».
💸BTC - найкращий день за 6 тижнів. 🔼BTC +3.75%
Showing the 12 most recent of 416 posts we hold for @tstamarkets_ua. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@tstamarkets_ua edited 3 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
- First edit seen
- 14 August 2026
- Most recent edit
- 5 November 2026
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
@vlad_gap · 7,3067 postseskka | TSTA
@ex_chequer · 2005 postsŁiquidĆartel
@liquidCartel · 464 postspidmurr | TSTA
@p1dmurr0tsta0 · 1344 postsЯ-Софа👩🏽💻
@cryptoastrolog17 · 12 postsj91.raw
@imjohn15_91 · 921 postlykaog
@lykaogfx · 271 postMasterovvvv
@masterovvvvv · 5261 postNektra Community
@nektracommunity · 1161 postPlain Trade
@plaintrade · 1541 postSMART MONEY [SMONEY]
@smoney_top · 551 postVadiqFX📈
@vadiqfx · 1191 postXLEB2004FX
@xleblydiknedyrnoi · 911 post
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 5 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
@cobacg · 11,310#1
@kosmonavtuss · 8,189#2
@crypto_hd · 131,684#3
@trade_ultra · 30,510#4
@dbss_show_u · 1,581#5
@BetterCallZeph · 3,854#6
@FXDenzz0 · 1,256#7
@elrmcf_free · 11,653#8
@str_crypto · 5,728#9
@Insider_krypto · 54,422#10
@ccVlad_TAM · 56,454#11
@Konstantin_Kudo_Cryptology · 48,456#12
@niktoneznaetx · 14,998#13
@savagetraderrrvlc · 8,679#14
@CryptologyKey · 47,004#15
@dshwchkfxx · 17,514#16
@cryptomannnisnotacult · 37,805#17
@cryptology_garry · 15,745#18
@s_sensy_channel · 2#19
@iso4217fx · 6,406#20
@darktradereducation · 26,078#21
@trade001k · 105,122#22
@finetiqsystems · 4,679#23
@viewoflazarus · 6,252#24
@cryptomannnacademy · 12,003#25
@incrypted · 107,024#26
@bidex_ua · 4,507#27
@ebitdaddy7 · 12,465#28
@pashatrltsk · 10,527#29
@indexanalyst · 6,539#30
@mirrorreflectionhub · 7,296#31
@hexdrunker_reflections · 31,245#32
@sollfx · 1,992#33
@mdstradess · 2,200#34
@tomtrikfx · 6,568#35
@SANCHO_DT · 65,952#36
@trader_gambler · 2,086#37
@truexanewsua · 3,169,848#38
@trading_001k · 28,114#39
@k_trader23 · 1,863#40
@thechronis · 986#41
@brysommemannen · 1,142#42
@sooloogooneefx · 3,936#43
@satoshithoughtwhynot · 7,950#44
@markettwits · 340,564#45
@marketlbs · 9,586#46
@retronodescryptology · 3,600#47
@hatchNo_1337 · 2,616#48
@scope360channel · 4,574#49
@ghostcarrera · 4,718#50
@a01k_crypto · 30,330#51
@ragnarockkyiv · 224,544#52
@oko_ua · 670#53
@n1cksonn · 2,537#54
@ddblefx · 591#55
@qivty · 4,671#56
@themethodfx · 7,617#57
@wahlberggym · 1,881#58
@cryptoattack24 · 55,227#59
@DnevnikCapitanika · 15,491#60
@okcrypta1 · 41,305#61
@voynareal · 1,543,649#62
@MirrorReflectionFarming · 2,210#63
@giiiirltrading · 4,248#64
@lachentyt · 1,581,346#65
@dogs · 6,475,477#66
@newsgrpua · 117,842#67
@war_monitor · 960,702#68
@ssternenko · 880,879#69
@blumcrypto · 12,924,609#70
@qliwazorfx · 4,899#71
@notcoin · 7,918,735#72
@bohdafx · 1,439#73
@turtleroadbycryptomannn · 4,411#74
@kievreal1 · 1,554,997#75
@insiderukr · 2,157,976#76
@lebigaa · 417,700#77
@kpszsu · 941,283#78
@kievinfo_kyiv · 1,260,107#79
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 25 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@Insider_krypto · 54,422
Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 24 August 2026
@Konstantin_Kudo_Cryptology · 48,456
Telegram ranks this channel #38 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 25 August 2026
@CryptologyKey · 47,004
Telegram ranks this channel #46 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 26 August 2026
@okcrypta1 · 41,305
Telegram ranks this channel #48 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 29 August 2026
@cryptomannnisnotacult · 37,805
Telegram ranks this channel #49 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 31 August 2026
@Elliotrading · 48,686
Telegram ranks this channel #50 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 25 August 2026
@crypto_hd · 131,684
Telegram ranks this channel #50 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 13 August 2026
@udianskyi · 92,556
Telegram ranks this channel #55 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 28 August 2026
@cooking787 · 21,058
Telegram ranks this channel #56 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 25 September 2026
@realestkiev · 19,494
Telegram ranks this channel #57 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 30 September 2026
@darktradereducation · 26,078
Telegram ranks this channel #62 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 11 September 2026
@trade001k · 105,122
Telegram ranks this channel #62 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 15 August 2026
@newsgrpua · 117,842
Telegram ranks this channel #67 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 14 August 2026
@hamaha_cryptodaytrading · 33,555
Telegram ranks this channel #68 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 3 September 2026
@popcornmemesol · 66,182
Telegram ranks this channel #68 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 19 August 2026
@divertito_official · 20,003
Telegram ranks this channel #69 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 1 October 2026
@incrypted · 107,024
Telegram ranks this channel #69 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 14 August 2026
@doubletop · 70,138
Telegram ranks this channel #77 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 20 August 2026
@MEMEcrypted · 18,740
Telegram ranks this channel #78 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 4 October 2026
This channel appears in 19 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 5 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“TSTA | Markets 🇺🇦” (@tstamarkets_ua), 20,730 subscribers as measured 5 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/tstamarkets_ua.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.