13 measurements spanning 13 days, net -32. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 15,160–15,235 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
19 Aug 2026, 12:25
15,184
+3
18 Aug 2026, 09:22
15,181
+11
17 Aug 2026, 10:22
15,170
+1
15 Aug 2026, 20:18
15,169
-6
14 Aug 2026, 08:37
15,175
-27
13 Aug 2026, 00:06
15,202
-7
12 Aug 2026, 02:56
15,209
+12
10 Aug 2026, 23:37
15,197
-16
9 Aug 2026, 20:11
15,213
+10
8 Aug 2026, 23:30
15,203
-23
7 Aug 2026, 20:11
15,226
+5
6 Aug 2026, 21:51
15,221
+5
6 Aug 2026, 08:49
15,216
first reading
Engagement
271 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 28 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
19.2%
avg views ÷ 15,184 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,910
265 posts measured
Reaction rate
4.55%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
271
of 271 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 20 August 2026
Posts held
271 (5 August 2026 – 20 August 2026)
Views total
771,092
Reactions total
35,066
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
20 Aug 2026, 07:18 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈2,420
Videos
≈1,960
Links
≈1,340
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 20 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
2h 01m
Average length
2m 08s
Measured directly from 57 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
33,343 reactions across 248 posts, in 41 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 30.2% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
👍
10,057
30.2%
💔
7,791
23.4%
❤
6,200
18.6%
😭
2,341
7.02%
🤬
2,194
6.58%
👏
1,700
5.10%
👌
445
1.33%
😢
385
1.15%
🥴
291
0.873%
😡
290
0.87%
🫡
240
0.72%
🔥
205
0.615%
🤡
196
0.588%
👎
187
0.561%
🤔
184
0.552%
❤🔥
163
0.489%
💯
105
0.315%
🕊
70
0.21%
🤓
65
0.195%
🤩
62
0.186%
21 further kinds
172
0.516%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 265 of the 271 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 35,066reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 271 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 20 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
۲۸ مرداد در پرتو قانون اساسی مشروطه؛ بازخوانی یک مناقشۀ تاریخی
✍️ نوشتۀ قلم کاوه
۲۸ مرداد همچنان یکی از مناقشهبرانگیزترین رویدادهای تاریخ معاصر ایران است و روایت «کودتا» از آن، دهههاست در ادبیات سیاسی ایران تکرار میشود. اما برای داوری تاریخی باید به قانون و اسناد زمان واقعه مراجعه کرد.
🔸یک. کودتا چیست؟
ادوارد لوتواک، کودتا را تصرف ناگهانی و غیرقانونی قدرت توسط گروهی محدود، معمولاً نظامی، با دور زدن روندهای حقوق…
✅خاطرات زندان (۱)
🎙شهاب الدین حائری شیرازی
در ۲۴ شهریور ۱۴۰۴ به واسطه نقدهایی که به سیاستهای کلی نظام خصوصا سیاست خارجی ج ا داشتم به زندان رفتم و ۲۴ بهمن آزاد شدم خاطرات این دوره خاص را طی ۵ صوت ۲۰ تا ۲۵ دقیقه ای با شما به اشتراک می گذارم.
امیدوارم مجموعه دوم آن هم در آینده در اختیار علاقه مندان قرار گیرد.
این مجموعه مشتمل بر ۵ قسمت است که بین هر قسمت و قسمت بعد یک تا یک ونیم دقیقه تنفس و موسیقی پخش میشود.
عزی…
⚡ تلنگر خراسانی
جمهوری اسلامی در آخرین دستوپا زدنهایش برای بقا، حق ندارد ایران را هم با خودش به ته دره ببرد.
سالها سیاست خارجی ماجراجویانه، تهدید، شعار، جنگ نیابتی و بازی خطرناک هستهای، کشور را به نقطهای رسانده که امروز حتی ادعای بررسی گزینهای به هولناکی استفاده از سلاح هستهای علیه ایران مطرح میشود. (X (formerly Twitter))
اینجا دیگر بحث اصلاحطلب و اصولگرا، چپ و راست یا دعوای جناحها نیست؛ بحث موجودیت ایرا…
#هشدار
🔹پیشتر نوشتم که آمریکاییها با کشتیهای خاصی اقدام به تراشیدن صخرههای تیز و مزاحم در مسیر جنوبِ تنگه هرمز (عمان) نمودهاند که مسیر تردد کشتیها در آن «کریدور» را هموار کنند.
▪️«انتقالِ بیسروصدای نفت از مسیر جنوبِ تنگه هرمز توسط آمریکا»، سکهی تنگه را از رونق خواهد انداخت؛ در صورت ادامه این اتفاق، آمریکا نه «محاصره» را رفع خواهد کرد، نه تحریمی لَق خواهد شد و نه پولی آزاد میگردد!
#علی_قلهکی
@iraneazadvaabad
🔺بخشی از اسناد سری پنتاگون از گزارشهای ژنرال هایزر
شاه فقید گفته بود
"من جرات، قلب و اندیشه لازم را برای ایفای نقشم دارم ولی قصد ندارم جوانان کشورم را به خاطر حکومت کردن بر آنان به قتل برسانم"
#جاوید_شاه
#شاهنشاه_آریامهر
@warnews_iran2026
کانال ۱۴ اسرائیل گزارش داد:
"در یک ویدئوی جدید، مصطفی خوشچشم، تحلیلگر سپاه، از رژیم ایران میخواهد تا آبهای فلوریدا را با «مینهای هوشمند» مینگذاری کند.
او استدلال میکند که هدف قرار دادن خط ساحلی ایالات متحده یک حواسپرتی استراتژیک بزرگ ایجاد میکند و واشنگتن را مجبور میسازد تا تمرکز نظامی خود را از خاورمیانه دور کند."
@iraneazadvaabad
🔹 بالاخره ترامپ قاطی کرد از دست آخوند:
هیچکس بیش از من به جمهوری اسلامی ایران فرصت بزرگی برای رسیدن به یک توافق نداده است. بهطرزی فاجعهبار برای خودشان، نتوانستند از آن استفاده کنند.
بنابراین، امروز اعلام میکنم که کوبندهترین عملیات اقتصادیای که تاکنون علیه هر کشوری انجام شده است، آغاز خواهد شد!
این، جنگ اقتصادی و انزوا در مقیاسی بیسابقه خواهد بود.
نیروی دریاییشان از بین رفته، نیروی هواییشان نابود شده، کار…
برآوردهای نطامی جنگ ۸ ساله و توصیه ای استراتژیک
در مقاطع مختلف جنگ تحمیلی، تصمیمسازان کشور بارها برآوردهایی خوشبینانه از امکان پیروزی تعیینکننده، تصرف بصره، یا واداشتن عراق به پایان جنگ از موضع ضعف ارائه دادند. مروری بر این برآوردها، تصویری از یک الگوی مکرر پیش چشم میگذارد:
۱. مرداد ۱۳۶۳؛ محسن رضایی، فرمانده سپاه، در نامه به امام خمینی نوشت اگر امکانات لازم در اختیار سپاه قرار گیرد، میتوان «جنگ را دو ساله با پی…
هرچه از شرایط جنگی فاصله میگیریم، بیشتر به تنظیمات کارخانه برمیگردند.
یکی کافـهها را پلمب میکند.
دیگری برق خانهها را قطع میکند .
عدهای در مجلس مصوبات قرونوسطایی تصویب میکنند.
و عدهای دیگر به فکر گران کردن بنزیناند...
چرا همین که سرتان خلوت میشود، به جنگ مردم میآیید؟!
@Newwaypolitics
@iraneazadvaabad
👍139🤬25❤3👎1
Showing the 12 most recent of 271 posts we hold for @iraneazadvaabad. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@iraneazadvaabad edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
9 August 2026
Most recent edit
9 August 2026
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 53,112 of 1,565,402entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 14 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“مهدی نصیری” (@iraneazadvaabad), 15,184 subscribers as measured 19 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/iraneazadvaabad.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.