Technology — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 20 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 95% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Observations
These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.
Content that also appears on other registered channels
Posts published here appear in near-verbatim form on 12 other registered channels. This entry also forms a group of 2 channels linked by matching posts. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.
Matching posts — open both and compare (6 of the pairs behind the counts below)
Channels this entry shares post bodies with, where at least one matching post pair has no forward credit between the two channels, or to a common source, recorded in our data
Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.
What this cannot establish
MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.
Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. 157 of the 157 matches recorded here fall after that date and carried no header when we read them. The rest predate reliable capture and are not evidence either way.
“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 2,942 comparable posts for this entry, running 5 August 2026 to 10 November 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.
The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.
Verbatim republication has three causes and the text separates only two: a clone/mirror, unattributed copy-paste, or BOTH channels copying a common third source that neither attributes. The spread filter (content held by at most 8 channels) reduces the third and does not remove it.
'Earliest' means earliest IN THIS CORPUS. A channel ingested one page deep will look younger than a neighbour ingested in full; corpus_coverage above is there to be checked before the direction is believed.
shared_verified_est extrapolates the sampled pass rate over the full narrow match count; sampled/passed are the numbers actually measured.
Absence of a forward header is not proof of intent: Telegram lets a channel disable forward attribution, and a credit written in the body is not parsed as attribution here (mention_edge_either_way above is the closest available signal).
Of the group of 2 channels, the one whose matching posts we hold earliest is @IT_Fouri — which is this entry. That is a statement about our reading window, not a claim of authorship.
Recorded under the keys clone_copy · clone_mutual · clone_source, last confirmed 11 November 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.
Channels linked by matching posts
This channel is in a group of 2 registered channels linked by matching posts. Links are found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register.
Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown in this list. “First” could only mean first in our own crawl, which depends on how deep we happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. Our one hand-check read 45 of the highest-confidence flagged pairs against the live Telegram pages. In 18 of them the live page showed a “Forwarded from” credit that our database had no record of, so reading that pair as an unattributed copy was wrong; the check did not measure who published first. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Near-verbatim matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.
65 measurements spanning 96 days, net -287. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 52,862–53,357 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 65
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
10 Nov 2026, 07:48
53,013
-15
8 Nov 2026, 17:59
53,028
-10
7 Nov 2026, 10:27
53,038
-16
6 Nov 2026, 09:40
53,054
+10
5 Nov 2026, 08:55
53,044
-21
4 Nov 2026, 09:56
53,065
+126
3 Nov 2026, 06:17
52,939
-6
2 Nov 2026, 07:46
52,945
-12
1 Nov 2026, 05:19
52,957
-8
31 Oct 2026, 01:49
52,965
+7
30 Oct 2026, 02:39
52,958
-7
29 Oct 2026, 00:01
52,965
-9
27 Oct 2026, 21:36
52,974
-11
26 Oct 2026, 18:28
52,985
+13
25 Oct 2026, 16:17
52,972
-11
24 Oct 2026, 19:07
52,983
+2
23 Oct 2026, 15:36
52,981
-3
22 Oct 2026, 15:54
52,984
-2
21 Oct 2026, 11:21
52,986
-13
20 Oct 2026, 09:46
52,999
first reading
Engagement
3,109 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 196 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
2.57%
avg views ÷ 53,013 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,360
1,095 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.187%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
1,095
of 3,109 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 519 of 1,095 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 10 November 2026
Posts held
3,109 (5 August 2026 – 10 November 2026)
Views total
1,494,358
Reactions total
1,671
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
11 Nov 2026, 02:19 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈48,300
Videos
≈6,240
Links
≈1,350
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 11 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
2h 40m
Average length
1m 15s
Measured directly from 128 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
1,555 reactions across 464 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 39.2% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
👍
610
39.2%
😁
568
36.5%
👎
377
24.2%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 470 of the 1,000 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,555 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 1,000 most recent posts we hold (the sample is capped at 1,000), published 14 October 2026 to 10 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 26 of 1,095 posts held from the last 30 days (2.37%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
نفوذ به سرورهای سگا؛ اطلاعات ۲٫۲ میلیون کاربر فاش شد
🔹ناشر بازیهای ویدیویی، سگا، وقوع یک رخنه اطلاعاتی را تأیید کرد که منجر به افشای نشانی ایمیل ۲٫۲ میلیون مشترک خبرنامه این شرکت شده است. این حادثه امنیتی پس از هک شدن شرکت ARARA، که بهعنوان ارائهدهنده خدمات شخص ثالث برای سگا فعالیت میکند، رخ داده است.
🔹اطلاعات فاششده شامل نام کاربری و گذرواژهها نیز میشود. مدیران سگا تأکید کردهاند که این نفوذ ارتباطی با حمله …
محسن رضایی: در حال حاضر هیچ مذاکرهای بین ما و واشنگتن وجود ندارد
دبیر شورایعالی امنیت ملی:
🔹تأکید میکنم که در حال حاضر هیچ مذاکرهای با آمریکاییها انجام نمیدهیم و در حال حاضر هیچ مذاکرهای بین ما و واشنگتن وجود ندارد.
🌐 @IT_Fouri
نیویورکتایمز: ترامپ پیش از سفر به چین از رابطه مدیرعامل انویدیا با مظنون به جاسوسی برای پکن مطلع شده بود
🔹به گزارش نیویورکتایمز، پیش از آنکه دونالد ترامپ اجازه دهد جنسن هوانگ، مدیرعامل شرکت انویدیا، در سفر ماه مه به پکن همراه هیئت آمریکایی باشد، به او هشدار داده شده بود که هوانگ با زنی که مظنون به جاسوسی برای چین است، رابطه عاطفی داشته است. این گزارش با اظهارات قبلی ترامپ مبنی بر بیاطلاعی از این موضوع در تناقض اس…
تلگرام قابلیت جدیدی به نام ویجت را برای باتها معرفی کرده است که به آنها امکان ارسال پیامهایی با محتوای HTML، CSS و JS را میدهد. این ویژگی به کاربران اجازه میدهد تا رابطهای کاربری تعاملی، سریع و زیبا را بدون نیاز به مینی اپلیکیشن ایجاد کنند
🔹ویجتها در محیط ایزولهای با موتور جاوااسکریپت محدود به نام QuickJS اجرا میشوند و حداکثر حجم آنها ۴ کیلوبایت است. این ویژگی باعث میشود که ویجتها به سرعت بارگذاری شوند و…
سامسونگ از مشکلات آیفون تاشو برای تبلیغ گوشی تاشو خود استفاده کرد
🔹عرضه نخستین گوشی تاشوی اپل با نام آیفون Duo با گزارشهایی درباره ترکخوردگی نمایشگر داخلی همراه شده است. در حالی که اپل هنوز علت دقیق این مشکل و تعداد دستگاههای آسیبدیده را اعلام نکرده، سامسونگ از این فرصت برای برجسته کردن تجربه چندینساله خود در تولید گوشیهای تاشو استفاده میکند.
🔹حساب سامسونگ کانادا در تبلیغ گلکسی Z فولد ۸ با اشاره به تجربه طولا…
مدیرعامل شرکت هواپیمایی آمریکایی یونایتد اعلام کرد: این شرکت در ابتدا قصد داشت ۶۵ درصد از هواپیماهای خود را به اینترنت ماهوارهای رایگان استارلینک مجهز کند، اما پس از نصب گیرنده استارلینک بر روی اولین هواپیما و دریافت بازخورد مثبت از مسافران، تصمیم به تجهیز تمامی هواپیماها به این اینترنت گرفت
وی تاکید کرد:
🔹مسافران اعلام کردند که به خاطر اینترنت استارلینک حاضرند پروازهای خود را از شرکتهای دیگر به یونایتد تغییر دهند…
اسپانیا خواستار تعلیق فعالیتهای تیکتاک تا زمان حذف محتوای سوءاستفاده جنسی از کودکان شد
🔹پس از انتشار گزارشی رسانهای مبنی بر ۱۱۸۳ پست جنسی درباره کودکان در این پلتفرم با میلیونها بازدید، دولت اسپانیا از تیکتاک خواسته است تا زمان حذف محتوای سوءاستفاده جنسی از کودکان، فعالیتهای خود را در اسپانیا به حالت تعلیق درآورد.
به گزارش سرویس ترجمه شفقنا؛ رویترز نوشت:
🔹طبق بیانیهای از سوی این وزارتخانه، «سیرا رگو» وزیر جو…
❤️🔥 گالری ساعت آلفاتایم
🍾 خرید قسطی بدون سود با 3روش
1️⃣: چک صیادی
2️⃣:اپلیکشین دیجی پی
3️⃣:اپلیکیشن اسنپ پی
😎 قبول کردن سفارشات شما و....
قرار داد پخش عمده با بانک ها و ادارها
🏫 امکان خرید حضوری و آنلاین
2️⃣در دوشعبه فعال
🛵پرداخت درب منزل فقط در کرج
🚘 ارسال رایگان تمام محصولات با جعبه و پاکت و ضمانت کتبی
🔮 @alphatime026 🔮
🔮@alphatime026🔮
آنتروپیک سه ابزار جدید برای کلاد معرفی کرد
🔹آنتروپیک امروز سه ابزار جدید برای کلاد معرفی کرد. Claude Whiteboards برنامههای پراکنده را روی تختهای قابل ویرایش برای تیمها سازماندهی میکند، Claude Sheets با درخواست یک ترکر یا بودجه، صفحهگستردهای کارآمد ایجاد میکند و Claude Data که پیشتر Dashboards نام داشت، اکنون برای تمامی مشترکان پلنهای پرداختی در دسترس است.
🔹در Claude Data، کلاد میتواند از متریکها، روایتها…
اورانیوم غنیشده از ۳٫۶۷ تا ۹۰ درصد؛ تفاوت کاربردها و اهمیت فنی
🔹غنیسازی در سطح ۳ تا ۵ درصد، در بسیاری از راکتورهای آب سبک برای تولید سوخت هستهای کاربرد دارد. توافق هستهای برجام نیز سقف غنیسازی ایران را برای دورهای مشخص ۳٫۶۷ درصد تعیین کرده بود. این سطح از غنیسازی بهمراتب پایینتر از سطح مورد استفاده در ساخت سلاح هستهای است.
🔹اورانیوم با غنای ۲۰ درصد در دسته اورانیوم با غنای بالا قرار میگیرد. این ماده میتو…
دلیل خرابی صفحه نمایش آیفون دوئو مشخص شد
🔹گزارشهای جدید نشان میدهد که خرابیهای صفحه نمایش آیفون دوئو به مواد اولیه معیوب یکی از تأمینکنندگان مربوط میشود و نه به طراحی مهندسی لولا. اپل برای مدیریت این مشکل، سیاست تعویض دستگاههای معیوب را به سرعت آغاز کرده است.
🔹آیا به نظر شما اپل میتواند در بازار گوشیهای تاشو رقیب سرسختی برای سامسونگ و سایر برندها باشد یا این چالشها تنها آغاز مشکلات است؟ نظرات خود را با ما د…
بله در بورس تهران پذیرش شد
🔹روابط عمومی پیامرسان بله در گفتوگو با دیجیاتو اعلام کرد که این مجموعه در بورس تهران پذیرش شده است. با این حال، هنوز اطلاعیهای در این باره در وبسایت بورس تهران منتشر نشده است.
🔹در روال معمول، خبر پذیرش شرکتها ابتدا از سوی بورس تهران اعلام میشود، اما این بار خود شرکت خبر پذیرش را منتشر کرده است.
🔹بله، یک پیامرسان با قابلیتهای بانکی و مالی است که علاوه بر ارسال پیام و ایجاد کانال، خد…
Showing the 12 most recent of 3,109 posts we hold for @IT_Fouri. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@IT_Fouri edited 7 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
21 August 2026
Most recent edit
6 October 2026
Posts recorded as deleted after publishing
We recorded 1 post on @IT_Fouri as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.
A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.
First seen missing
15 October 2026
Most recent seen missing
15 October 2026
Median time before seen missing
13 hours
Seen missing in the last 30 days
1
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 40 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 23 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 24 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
امیر تشکر Amir Tashakor @tashakor · 22,504 Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 55 here — alongside 54 others — read 5 September 2026
علم و فناوری | Dr IT @it_24 · 37,489 Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 31 August 2026
اقتصاد فوری 📈 @Econ_Fouri · 44,174 Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 28 August 2026
تهران فوری 🏙 @Tehran_Fouri · 65,888 Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 20 August 2026
جهان بینالملل فوری🌍 @Jahan_Fouri · 80,427 Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 18 August 2026
سلامت فوری 🍏 @Salamat_Fouri · 20,419 Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 27 September 2026
ورزش فوری 🥇 @Sporte_Fouri · 25,609 Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 13 September 2026
حوادث فوری ⚠️ @Havades_Fouri · 32,665 Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 4 September 2026
️محمدرضا دانایی | Mreza Danaei️ @Mreza_Danaei · 19,179 Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 65 here — alongside 64 others — read 2 October 2026
قیمت روز ارز🏅 @arz_tala_ir1 · 28,528 Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 29 here — alongside 28 others — read 14 September 2026
توییت پروتو TweetProto @tweetproto · 33,254 Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 67 here — alongside 66 others — read 3 September 2026
خبرهای فوری مهم 🔖 @khabar_fouri · 1,148,952 Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 8 August 2026
Digiato | دیجیاتو @Digiato · 115,453 Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 14 August 2026
دنیای علم و تکنولوژی @Tech_Sci · 35,736 Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 2 September 2026
کانال خبر @channele_khabar · 34,202 Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 3 September 2026
Zoomit | زومیت @thezoomit · 132,579 Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 13 August 2026
عصر فردا @asrefarda_ir · 357,635 Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 8 August 2026
خبر فوری و مهم مقاومت @Roozname · 31,822 Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 7 September 2026
اپل لند @appland_store · 47,198 Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 60 here — alongside 59 others — read 26 August 2026
ⓀoD85 @kod85 · 18,897 Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 18 September 2026
ايران ios كانال آموزش @learn_ios · 28,466 Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 59 here — alongside 58 others — read 9 September 2026
اخبار رسمی @akhbar_rasmi_6 · 64,340 Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 22 August 2026
اكوتودی @ecotoday_ir · 41,539 Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 50 here — alongside 49 others — read 31 August 2026
کُدئین @official_codine · 24,735 Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 15 September 2026
This channel appears in 50 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 November 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“فناوری فوری📡” (@IT_Fouri), 53,013 subscribers as measured 10 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/IT_Fouri.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.