Channel
@oaembr81
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
245subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001531077499 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @oaembr81 |
| Description | Збираємо докази поганих дій командування щодо наших хлопців! Збираємо інформацію про потреби наших бійців, для передачі її волонтерам. Говоримо про те, про що мовчать на "офіційних сторінках" бригади. |
| Created | 16 February 2022 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 8 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/oaembr81 |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 8 Aug 2026, 09:35 | 245 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 19:56 | 245 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 13 May 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 May 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Measured directly from 8 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
54 reactions across 15 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 25.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 14 | 25.9% | |
| ❤ | 13 | 24.1% | |
| 😢 | 10 | 18.5% | |
| 🙏 | 4 | 7.41% | |
| ❤🔥 | 3 | 5.56% | |
| 🔥 | 3 | 5.56% | |
| 😁 | 3 | 5.56% | |
| 👌 | 2 | 3.70% | |
| 🤬 | 2 | 3.70% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 54reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 13 May 2024 to 7 May 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
На РФ змінили командувача ВКС — тобто того, хто завдає ударів і відповідає за ППО. Удари по НПЗ і по Москві дали результат. Пишуть, що призначили того, хто відповідав за Бучу та вбивство мирних. Чайко у 2022 році «вирізнився» на київському напрямку, а потім був відправлений до Сирії, де, як ви самі знаєте, сталося те, що сталося, і куди після цього втік Садік Асад, поступившись своїм троном Бармалею, який їсть дітей…
Несколько военных из 81 бригады во время выполнения боевого задания в Донецкой области оказались в подвале под завалами, где находятся уже 35 дней, но командование не делает ничего, чтобы их спасти, сообщила пользователь TikTok Vika Mayd. По ее словам, военные еще больше месяца назад сообщили командованию, что находятся в подвале под завалами, что у них есть еда, но с тех пор не было ни одной попытки их спасти. Отм…
🙏2
Все больше солдат всу сдаются в плен (Pt 13) 🇺🇦Марко Александр Михайлович 1985 г. 00:00 Взят в плен РотойМирона 🦾 00:30 Великобританцы на территории Украины 00:47 Полигон 00:55 Попал в бригаду и фронт 01:10 Не выживешь - Житомир ещё пришлет 01:28 ПВД в одном доме с гражданскими 02:07 Кто чувствует себя защищённым в 404. 02:20 Как сдавался в плен 02:42 - Я из 81 бригады - ОО,это наш парень 😄 02:55 Спасиб…
🔥1😢1
В полоні: військовослужбовець 81 ОАЕМБР ЗСУ Печолат Сергій Іванович
😢3
В полоні: військовослужбовець 81 ОАЕМБР ЗСУ Цах Сергій Сергійович, 04.03.1999 р.н.
😢3❤1
В полоні: військовослужбовець 81 ОАЕМБР ЗСУ Марков Олександр Михайлович
😢3
Живий, здоровий, нехай русня не радується. Воюємо далі, руки і голова на місці 🫡 Не відписуватися, тримаємо стрій! Завжди перші! Далі буде цікаво 😳 Якщо пропадаю, раджу стежити за інформацією на цих каналах👇🏻 https://t.me/bozhejakekonchene https://t.me/operativnoZSU https://t.me/sova_ukra https://t.me/akovalenko1989 https://t.me/ukrbavovna https://t.me/stanislav_osman https://t.me/bihusinfo https://t.me/sowaFm https…
❤🔥3👍1😁1
https://www.slidstvo.info/articles/italiia-zamist-roboty-narodnyy-deputat-mih-izdyty-na-vidpochynok-oformliuiuchy-zakordonni-vidriadzhennia/
👍3
💸 Батько “мутить схеми”, сини - скуповують квадратні метри Заробіток на дитсадках у Борщагівці - він такий. Спершу сільрада роздає бізнесу землі, а тоді викуповує за дорого приватні садочки, які звели на цих землях разом із ЖК. Де тут підозріле збагачення, якщо громада ще й ПЕРЕПЛАЧУЄ за садки? У квадратних метрах голови. Точніше - його синів. У декларації Олеся Кудрика все доволі скромно. З 2012 року начебто ні ві…
👍3❤1
На Курщині частина російських військ практично в котлі, - очільник Центру протидії дезінформації У той же час, в ефірах у росіян все стабільно.
❤2
Потере территорий на Востоке способствуют в том числе плохо обученные мобилизованные, заявили Associated Press украинские командиры. «Они не получают даже самого низкого уровня подготовки, необходимого для наших (боевых) действий. Некоторые люди не хотят стрелять. Они видят противника на огневой позиции в окопах, но не открывают огонь. Вот почему наши люди гибнут. Когда они не используют оружие, они неэффективны. Ст…
❤2
Київ 1993 року Впізнав всі місця? ❤️ — так 💔 — ні Читай та підписуйся на «ТиКиїв» у Telegram | Instagram | TikTok | YouTube та не забувай запропонувати новину.
❤6👌2
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @oaembr81. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 1,105,558 of 1,176,251entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@oaembr81 named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“81 ОАеМБр ДШВ ЗСУ” (@oaembr81), 245 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/oaembr81.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.