INTEL: Meta $META fined €805 million by Italy over alleged use of Android users' photos and videos without consent | Per Reuters Italy's data protection authority is the regulator behind the fine Twitter | News
custom 53235796094033673765🗿1

Channel
@SolidIntelX
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Cite this entry
8,392subscribers
+302 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002457358877 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @SolidIntelX |
| Description | Solid Finance & Crypto Intel news channel to keep you updated regarding all important market updates Twitter: https://x.com/solidintel_x |
| Created | Between 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 10 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 25 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 10 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/SolidIntelX |
Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 55% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 10 Nov 2026, 21:46 | 8,392 | +28 |
| 7 Nov 2026, 03:27 | 8,364 | +30 |
| 3 Nov 2026, 23:12 | 8,334 | +25 |
| 31 Oct 2026, 13:04 | 8,309 | +94 |
| 25 Oct 2026, 15:38 | 8,215 | +3 |
| 22 Oct 2026, 21:38 | 8,212 | +4 |
| 20 Oct 2026, 04:18 | 8,208 | -4 |
| 17 Oct 2026, 05:09 | 8,212 | +2 |
| 13 Oct 2026, 18:25 | 8,210 | -16 |
| 7 Oct 2026, 22:20 | 8,226 | +1 |
| 1 Oct 2026, 11:56 | 8,225 | +113 |
| 16 Sept 2026, 11:37 | 8,112 | +29 |
| 12 Sept 2026, 11:56 | 8,083 | +8 |
| 8 Sept 2026, 07:41 | 8,075 | -8 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 19:24 | 8,083 | -11 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 02:36 | 8,094 | -6 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 03:29 | 8,100 | -3 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 12:53 | 8,103 | -3 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 20:16 | 8,106 | +20 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 08:48 | 8,086 | first reading |
362 posts held, back to 31 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 43 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 275 of 276 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 14 November 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 362 (31 July 2026 – 14 November 2026) |
| Views total | 309,035 |
| Reactions total | 3,833 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 14 Nov 2026, 14:01 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 14 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
5,641 reactions across 354 posts, in 35 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 20.2% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5460994085856747166 | 1,140 | 20.2% | |
| 👍 | 437 | 7.75% | |
| ❤ | 422 | 7.48% | |
| 🤯 | 409 | 7.25% | |
| custom 4983482941897180050 | 396 | 7.02% | |
| custom 4983684955683947251 | 360 | 6.38% | |
| custom 4983686248469103562 | 305 | 5.41% | |
| custom 5276326602551075255 | 299 | 5.30% | |
| 👏 | 209 | 3.71% | |
| 💩 | 204 | 3.62% | |
| 🌭 | 196 | 3.47% | |
| 🔥 | 161 | 2.85% | |
| custom 5350610127814667109 | 124 | 2.20% | |
| custom 5240221642877050725 | 97 | 1.72% | |
| custom 5197215164679593605 | 92 | 1.63% | |
| custom 5012974515223790216 | 84 | 1.49% | |
| custom 4988202599854375855 | 79 | 1.40% | |
| custom 5375151532289314066 | 73 | 1.29% | |
| custom 5001395287688741934 | 70 | 1.24% | |
| 👀 | 63 | 1.12% | |
| 15 further kinds | 421 | 7.46% |
Custom emoji. 12 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 356 of the 362 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 5,667 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 362 most recent posts we hold, published 31 July 2026 to 14 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @SolidIntelX. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 362 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 31 July 2026 to 14 November 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 256 of 281 posts held from the last 30 days (91.1%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
INTEL: Meta $META fined €805 million by Italy over alleged use of Android users' photos and videos without consent | Per Reuters Italy's data protection authority is the regulator behind the fine Twitter | News
custom 53235796094033673765🗿1
INTEL: Kava $KAVA crashes 38% as Upbit and Bithumb suspend deposits over suspected security incident The Kava team says it is monitoring unusual activity from a DApp in its ecosystem and will issue a new statement. No loss figure or app name has been confirmed Updates • Kava confirms BSC KAVA cross-chain selling, says not unlimited minting, isolated to Kava Lend Twitter | News
custom 53710124980759645735custom 53235796094033673764custom 49834829418971800503
INTEL: Bitcoin and Ethereum ETFs see $1.46 billion in outflows this week Twitter | News
custom 53506101278146671099custom 49836849556839472512custom 49836862484691035622
INTEL: Microsoft $MSFT says Outlook, Teams and Copilot are fully recovered after global outage | Per Microsoft The outage hit users in at least 70 countries. Microsoft blamed a bug from a network capacity upgrade and said it was not a cyberattack Twitter | News
custom 49836862484691035626❤3custom 53710124980759645733
INTEL: US officials worry Nvidia $NVDA's Jensen Huang was ensnared in China's intelligence operation | Per WSJ The WSJ describes Beijing's effort as the world's biggest intelligence-gathering operation Twitter | News
custom 53235796094033673766custom 53506101278146671092
INTEL: US bases in the UK reportedly raised to highest alert level FPCON Delta Security concerns are escalating around US military installations in Britain. RAF Lakenheath and RAF Mildenhall have been placed under FPCON Charlie following reported Iranian threats, while US forces have now responded to suspected unauthorized drone activity over Lakenheath. The US has also relocated multiple military aircraft from Br…
custom 49836862484691035625custom 53506101278146671092custom 49836849556839472511
INTEL: Homeland Security chief Mullin says there is no indication of a threat to the US but is not ruling out any cause, including a cyberattack Mullin says resolving the FAA issue will take time, refuses to rule out a potential link to AI, and confirms all passengers and flights are accounted for Twitter | News
👻5custom 53235796094033673763custom 49836862484691035622
INTEL: US National Weather Service confirms nationwide radar outage The agency reports nationwide internet and communications issues Updates • NWS says technicians are actively working to fix the issues Twitter | News
custom 49834829418971800505custom 49836862484691035622custom 53373053370389099062
INTEL: Preliminary reports indicate the major US air traffic outage was NOT caused by a cyberattack, CNN reports, citing law enforcement officials. The cause remains unknown, but officials say early findings point away from a cyberattack Updates • About 3,100 aircraft airborne and en route to US airports, per flight trackers • About 7,800 flights delayed and about 350 cancelled by 4:45pm ET, per NYT • Duffy blames …
custom 49834829418971800504custom 53506101278146671093custom 49836849556839472512
INTEL: All US flights grounded nationwide as FAA orders ground stop for all aircraft | Per FAA The FAA cites safety and extraordinary circumstances. Early reports pointed to FAA radio issues, but no cause has been confirmed Updates • FAA confirms national ground stop for all US aircraft, citing safety and extraordinary circumstances • Inbound international flights to be managed case-by-case per FAA • Duffy confirms…
custom 49836849556839472516custom 53710124980759645734❤1
INTEL: Musk says he is signing petition to reinstate Jensen Huang as Nvidia $NVDA CEO Twitter | News
💩8🙏8custom 53506101278146671092
INTEL: Japan suspected of intervening in the yen market Twitter | News
custom 53506101278146671099custom 49834829418971800505custom 49836862484691035621
Showing the 12 most recent of 362 posts we hold for @SolidIntelX. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
@SolidIntelX edited 7 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Solid Intel 🛰” (@SolidIntelX), 8,392 subscribers as measured 10 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/SolidIntelX.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.