$Btc Update OI is continuing to rise while price isn't moving much, which could be a sign of accumulation before a breakout Price Action is also looking good here Higher!!
❤14👍3👀1

Channel
@tradetalksbyTaqwa
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Handles named that no longer answer · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
4,163subscribers
-60 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002169001502 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @tradetalksbyTaqwa |
| Created | Between 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 15 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 13 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 15 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/tradetalksbyTaqwa |
Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 13 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 15 Sept 2026, 20:58 | 4,163 | -3 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 20:19 | 4,166 | -1 |
| 7 Sept 2026, 07:00 | 4,167 | -14 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 07:46 | 4,181 | +6 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 07:47 | 4,175 | -5 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 08:42 | 4,180 | +2 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 15:07 | 4,178 | -16 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 20:23 | 4,194 | -9 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 21:26 | 4,203 | -15 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 10:32 | 4,218 | -3 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 12:37 | 4,221 | -2 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 14:02 | 4,223 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 13:48 | 4,223 | first reading |
14 posts held, back to 22 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 4 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 14 posts for this entry, the most recent from 4 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
81 reactions across 12 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 61.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 50 | 61.7% | |
| 👍 | 15 | 18.5% | |
| 🔥 | 8 | 9.88% | |
| 👀 | 3 | 3.70% | |
| 🎉 | 2 | 2.47% | |
| 🤝 | 2 | 2.47% | |
| 🙉 | 1 | 1.23% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 12 of the 14 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 81 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 14 most recent posts we hold, published 22 July 2026 to 4 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
$Btc Update OI is continuing to rise while price isn't moving much, which could be a sign of accumulation before a breakout Price Action is also looking good here Higher!!
❤14👍3👀1
Another day, another winner at tradetalksbyT $ENSO was shared 2 days ago using my scanner. ✅ Entry Sniped ✅ Already +1.2R and running While most people chase pumps, our members are already positioned before the move. Still trading on your own? Get access to all FREE setups at Trade Talks. All you need to do: • Register on BloFin using my referral. https://partner.blofin.com/d/Taqwa • Deposit $300–$500 (minimu…
🤝2
People often ask me ,what’s the difference between Free Telegram and VIP Discord? Telegram gives you the free setup. Discord gives you the reasoning behind the setup. Take this $ADA long for example. In Telegram, you would’ve simply received the entry. In Discord, we broke down: • Why buyers kept defending resistance? • Why rising Open Interest during consolidation was bullish? • Why the retest mattered? • Why t…
❤5👍1
Another one $Btc Long 1R up Nice Start to Aug $Ondo Short 1.3R down $Enso Long 1.2R up $Ada long 0.7R up All Free Setups posted in Trade Talks :) Still not part of us?
❤1🔥1
Another one $Enso 1.2R up
$Ondo 1R down Good start to Aug!! Posting reasoning soon, why we took the short setup in first place!
🔥3❤1
July, 2026 Performance Report Transparency has always been our priority. TradetalksbyT (VIP Discord) ✅ 24.14R ✅ 75% Accuracy Trade Talks Alpha (FREE Telegram) ✅ 35.14R ✅ 74.2% Accuracy What’s the difference? 📌 Trade Talks (Discord) • Higher-conviction setups • BTC & market updates • Educational content • Chart requests • Learn the reasoning behind every trade 📌 Trade Talks Alpha (Telegram) • More trade setups •…
🔥4❤1
$Broccoli 🚀
❤1
$BROCCOLI714 Anyone who got in?
❤3🎉2👍2
$BROCCOLI714 is setting up nicely for a Limit Entry • Price is range-bound. • Open Interest keeps building. • Liquidity rests around 0.01239. • A retest of the 50 SMA into that liquidity would be the ideal trigger. Instead of chasing the breakout, I'm placing a limit order
https://x.com/taqwaayub/status/2081049470368936005?s=20 Quick $BTC update (1H TF) I'm not interested in longing just yet. The level I'm watching is 64.8K. ✅ First, I want to see a clean break above it. ✅ Then, I want to see a successful retest. Only then will I consider long positions. For the exact entry, stop loss, and targets, watch the video. If you enjoy my analysis and want regular trade setups, join o…
❤6👍1
$Ena It was clean :)
👍5
Showing the 12 most recent of 14 posts we hold for @tradetalksbyTaqwa. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
@tradetalksbyTaqwa named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 9 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Trade Talks” (@tradetalksbyTaqwa), 4,163 subscribers as measured 15 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/tradetalksbyTaqwa.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.