Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

時事精选 🍁

@qwezz336

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

884subscribers

-1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001883062947
TypeChannel
Username@qwezz336
CreatedBetween 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 14 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/qwezz336

Growth

884885884.57 August 2026 — 885 subscribers7 August 2026 — 885 subscribers14 August 2026 — 884 subscribers7 August 202614 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 7 days, net -1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 884–885 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
14 Aug 2026, 20:55884-1
7 Aug 2026, 10:03885no change
7 Aug 2026, 09:55885first reading

Engagement

19 posts held, back to 13 April 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 4 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

4 reactions across 3 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 50.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🤣250.0%
🙏125.0%
🥱125.0%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 3 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 4reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 13 April 2025 to 4 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

4 Jul 2026, 08:06 UTC177 viewsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @aznc4566

GDP不要了?中共官员集体“躺平” * 阿波罗新闻网 https://www.aboluowang.com/2026/0704/2403774.html

30 Jun 2026, 03:10 UTC216 viewsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @aznc4566Photo

中国官员:困在政绩和债务之间,只能选择表演 6月27日,华尔街日报发表分析文章,习近平一边打击“官员躺平”,一边整治”政绩冲动”,让中国的官僚们左右为难。 淄博市委书记江敦涛曾因大力推动产业转型、吸引私人投资而仕途顺遂,一度升任重庆副市长。然而其主政期间淄博债务翻番,达1080亿元人民币,终以”急功近利、盲目蛮干”之名被中纪委开除党籍并移送检察机关。他的标志性口号是“政府不举债就是不作为”。 江敦涛案折射出习近平当前整治官场”政绩工程”的整体方向。在经济高速增长时代,大举借债、上马项目往往换来晋升;但眼下中国面临需求疲软、房地产低迷,财政困难等困境,习近平明确批评此类行为"劳民伤财"。 然而整治本身也带来副作用:大规模反腐与忠诚度审查在官僚体系中制造恐惧,部分官员以拖延决策、虚报数据、做表面文章应对,反而加剧了政策执行失灵。去年,近16万人因"不作为、乱作为或弄虚作假"受到处分,同比增加16%。

27 Jan 2026, 00:44 UTC653 viewsread 7 August 2026
File

破产中国万众创业返贫,月薪三千全职儿女遍地。中国经济下行千万毕业生找不到工作,政府贴心推出创业项目想掏干净学生家底。万众创业堪比当年下海最后一地鸡毛,全民均贫社会稳定 https://t.me/aznc4566

9 Jan 2026, 07:02 UTC722 viewsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @aznc4566

太子集团陈志被遣返中国 内情解析 | 电诈 | 柬埔寨 | 诈骗 | 大纪元 https://www.epochtimes.com/gb/26/1/8/n14671433.htm

2 Jan 2026, 12:01 UTC598 viewsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @aznc4566

中共烟草系统官员高额退休金引热议 | 逾万退休金 | 质疑 | 大纪元 https://www.epochtimes.com/gb/26/1/2/n14667433.htm

30 Dec 2025, 10:57 UTC491 viewsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @aznc4566

内幕:中共视失业青年为头号风险 | 防控 | 青年抗议 | 列入明年 | 大纪元 https://www.epochtimes.com/gb/25/12/30/n14664895.htm

29 Dec 2025, 11:46 UTC400 viewsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @aznc4566

知情人:30万词条遭屏蔽 “躺平摆烂”在列 | 社媒 | 词库 | 12人 | 大纪元 https://www.epochtimes.com/gb/25/12/29/n14664157.htm

20 Dec 2025, 02:20 UTC409 views1 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @aznc4566

王赫:点评2025年中国三大社会新闻 * 阿波罗新闻网 https://www.aboluowang.com/2025/1219/2322481.html

🙏1

13 Apr 2025, 02:31 UTC551 views1 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @aznc4566Photo

又有网友在恶意提问 source

🥱1

13 Apr 2025, 02:31 UTC723 viewsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @aznc4566Photo

你最好说的是唐国强 source

13 Apr 2025, 02:31 UTC907 viewsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @aznc4566Video

加关税一年后:观音土为什么是营养食品?搭配杨树皮才能营养均衡🤪 source

13 Apr 2025, 02:31 UTC≈1,160 views2 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @aznc4566Video

真的如同这名专家说的“不在乎”吗?如果不在乎失去美国市场,那为何不立刻脱钩断链呢。 source

🤣2

Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @qwezz336. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,186,065 of 1,480,688entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“時事精选 🍁” (@qwezz336), 884 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/qwezz336.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.