Video, posted without a caption
😱8🤬4

Channel
@RickyWong2022
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
2,053subscribers
-2 since we began measuring on 15 September 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001596878445 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @RickyWong2022 |
| Created | Between 1 August 2021 and 28 February 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 15 September 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 16 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 16 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/RickyWong2022 |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 16 Sept 2026, 06:18 | 2,053 | -2 |
| 15 Sept 2026, 07:22 | 2,055 | no change |
| 15 Sept 2026, 06:47 | 2,055 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 1 September 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 10 May 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 17 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
276 reactions across 20 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 38.8% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 107 | 38.8% | |
| ❤ | 75 | 27.2% | |
| 🤬 | 41 | 14.9% | |
| 😱 | 18 | 6.52% | |
| 🙏 | 15 | 5.43% | |
| 🤩 | 11 | 3.99% | |
| 🔥 | 4 | 1.45% | |
| 👏 | 3 | 1.09% | |
| 💯 | 2 | 0.725% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 276 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 1 September 2025 to 10 May 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Video, posted without a caption
😱8🤬4
Video, posted without a caption
👍8❤1
Photo, posted without a caption
🤬7
1937年,日軍南京大屠殺真實影像,男性遭集體屠殺、女性被肆意凌辱!
🤬4😱4👍3❤1
1937年日軍入侵中國大屠殺平民
🤬4
天道輪迴
👍11😱5🙏3❤2
台灣館長所說的生物、確實在世界每個角落,都是真實存在
🤩11👏3
俄語名曲《多想活著》正是一首透過回望生命本身價值,來給予人們前進力量的歌曲。 它提醒我們,有時正是那些看似平凡的日常、溫暖的陪伴,以及內心對未來的希望,構成了我們"活著"的最深層的意義。願世界和平!
❤23
未睡醒的人是聽不進去!
👍16💯2
館長分析歷史給認賊作父的美日走狗
👍10
館長為(賴漢奸)尋根之旅
👍6
香港立法會缺乏這種人才來平衡極端立法,現在只有一班低智商議員,不做正事,一面倒通過立法打壓民生!
👍12
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @RickyWong2022. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Ricky Wong” (@RickyWong2022), 2,053 subscribers as measured 16 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/RickyWong2022.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.