Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 🌐 新纪元 新闻中心

Channel

🌐 新纪元 新闻中心

@xinjiyuan9

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

8,613subscribers

-97 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001232395606
TypeChannel
Username@xinjiyuan9
CreatedBetween 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live18 September 2026
Measurements held14
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 18 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/xinjiyuan9

Topic

National news — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 48% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

8,6138,7108,661.56 August 2026 — 8,710 subscribers6 August 2026 — 8,706 subscribers10 August 2026 — 8,703 subscribers13 August 2026 — 8,698 subscribers16 August 2026 — 8,682 subscribers19 August 2026 — 8,672 subscribers23 August 2026 — 8,668 subscribers26 August 2026 — 8,664 subscribers29 August 2026 — 8,656 subscribers1 September 2026 — 8,647 subscribers4 September 2026 — 8,640 subscribers10 September 2026 — 8,634 subscribers13 September 2026 — 8,621 subscribers18 September 2026 — 8,613 subscribers6 August 202618 September 2026
14 measurements spanning 43 days, net -97. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 8,598–8,725 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
18 Sept 2026, 00:398,613-8
13 Sept 2026, 21:218,621-13
10 Sept 2026, 13:018,634-6
4 Sept 2026, 23:018,640-7
1 Sept 2026, 12:078,647-9
29 Aug 2026, 13:038,656-8
26 Aug 2026, 16:168,664-4
23 Aug 2026, 06:348,668-4
19 Aug 2026, 15:288,672-10
16 Aug 2026, 16:178,682-16
13 Aug 2026, 07:268,698-5
10 Aug 2026, 06:158,703-3
6 Aug 2026, 20:478,706-4
6 Aug 2026, 05:038,710first reading

Engagement

434 posts held, back to 5 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 28 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
0.34%
avg views ÷ 8,613 subscribers
Avg views / post
29.3
94 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.54%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
94
of 434 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 1 of 94 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 28 August 2026
Posts held434 (5 August 202628 August 2026)
Views total2,752
Reactions total1
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken28 Aug 2026, 16:37 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
109h 30m
Average length
20m 40s

Measured directly from 318 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

12 reactions across 12 posts, in 1 kind.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
12100.0%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 434 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 13 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 434 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 28 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

28 Aug 2026, 16:23 UTC11 viewsread 28 August 2026
Video

行板与回旋曲 邀您加入『🌐新纪元 新闻中心』

28 Aug 2026, 15:47 UTC33 viewsread 28 August 2026
Video

大宇拍案惊奇 ⛄️张又侠正式被免去军委副主席!习近平为此付出巨大代价; ⛄️半年为景甜花1亿!孙宇晨却舍不得给景甜一部iPhone?曾经穷小子对梦中情人的“复仇”,两人根本不该在一起?深度分析! https://www.ganjingworld.com/s/WEKgpVO63R 邀您加入『🌐新纪元 新闻中心』

28 Aug 2026, 15:24 UTC44 viewsread 28 August 2026
Video

新闻大破解 🌊中共出境铁笼52类人曝光! 🌊湖北日报公然唱习反调! 🌊香港民主「有罪」? 🌊普丁核武牌测试北约? 邀您加入『🌐新纪元 新闻中心』

28 Aug 2026, 15:03 UTC56 viewsread 28 August 2026
Video

阿波罗网 热点直击 ⚔️💥9次兵推全败!40万共军攻台纯送命; 🔹算完惊呆!移民美国活太舒服; 🔹泥石流摧毁西藏口岸,现场上千人恐难逃; 🔹犯众怒!泥石流3亡超24小时未更新; 🔹史无前例!中共海军基地连遭三台风袭击 邀您加入『🌐新纪元 新闻中心』

28 Aug 2026, 15:01 UTC51 viewsread 28 August 2026
Video

陈破空纵论天下 🥯惊人造假!李强没去灾难现场?出席政治局会议,传将出任军委副主席。 🥯中方忽然停止搜救。 🥯泥石流早上在中国爆发,下午才通知尼方。 🥯王毅急见美国大使,挽救某人访美之行 邀您加入『🌐新纪元 新闻中心』

28 Aug 2026, 14:57 UTC50 viewsread 28 August 2026
Video

慧眼看中国 惊人!中国早知道有灾害,却一直在隐瞒? 整座口岸十几栋楼被泥石流夷平,千人遇难 邀您加入『🌐新纪元 新闻中心』

28 Aug 2026, 13:03 UTC92 viewsread 28 August 2026
Photo

尼泊尔预警第二次山洪风险 8月28日,尼泊尔国家减少灾害风险管理局(NDRRMA)发布预警信息表示,26日发生严重洪水的博特科希河地区裹挟大量泥沙的水流不断升高,存在第二次爆发山洪的风险。 邀您加入 『🌐新纪元 新闻中心』

28 Aug 2026, 13:03 UTC89 viewsread 28 August 2026
Photo

8月28日,X平台宣布,其安全团队在调查涉嫌参与影响行动的中国虚假账号时,发现一个规模约20万个账号的机器人农场。其中约200个账号被发现正在介入美国AI与能源政策讨论,发布“AI数据中心推高居民电价、加剧电网压力”等内容,并使用AI生成漫画进行传播。... 邀您加入 『🌐新纪元 新闻中心』

28 Aug 2026, 13:03 UTC82 viewsread 28 August 2026
Photo

翻墙软件Clash Verge再登央视 8月27日,中央电视台《天下财经》播出的《AI大模型竞争白热化 词元价格更普惠算力更稀缺》节目中,再次出现了翻墙软件Clash Verge。 ➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖ 央视报道中国开源模型下载量登顶,电脑却开着Clash Verge 8月7日,央视《朝闻天下》播出“全球开源模型下载量,中国模型居榜首”的报道。 有网友发现,报道画面中工作人员使用的电脑上,正开着代理客户端Clash Verge。 Clash Verge常被中国大陆网民用于连接境外网络服务,而中国开源模型的全球下载数据主要来自Hugging Face等国际平台。 邀您加入 『🌐新纪元 新闻中心』

28 Aug 2026, 13:03 UTC74 viewsread 28 August 2026
Photo

澎湃新闻:让老师跟“耻辱”合影,才是真耻辱 8月28日,据澎湃新闻报道,四川省雷波县教师“耻辱”合影事件引发热议后,当地已启动调查程序。 ➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖ “凉山雷波‘创新’激励法:小学30分以下、初中15分以下教师集体‘耻辱合影’” 8月26日,四川凉山州雷波县召开2026年秋季教育行政会。 会议期间,部分教师被要求上台合影,现场大屏幕背景分别标注“小学期末考试平均成绩30分以下”“初中期末考试平均成绩15分以下”教师合影,屏幕中央醒目位置均写有巨大的“耻辱”二字。 现场画面引发网友热议, “当老师现在就意味丧失人权了!” “闻所未闻,五千年中华文明从未有过今日这样公开羞辱教师的” 还有网友指出,相关规定早已明确“严禁以升学率或考试成绩对学校进行考核排名,对教师进行排名奖惩”。 邀您加入 『🌐新纪元 新闻中心』

28 Aug 2026, 13:02 UTC75 viewsread 28 August 2026
Photo

“抗洪民兵在水中匆匆用餐” 8月26日,南国早报发布一段广西崇左抗洪现场视频。 视频中,一名参与抗洪的民兵站在浑浊洪水中,一手端着盒饭、一手拿筷子匆匆吃饭,随后画面显示多名抢险人员直接在堤岸旁用餐。 邀您加入 『🌐新纪元 新闻中心』

28 Aug 2026, 13:02 UTC76 viewsread 28 August 2026
Photo

环卫工“偷拍”领导车辆被罚款 8月27日,天津。有网友曝光了名为“东城道路巡查群”的微信工作群聊天记录。 记录中显示,巡查人员在群内不定时发布对基层环卫工人的罚款通知,原因包括“坐岗”、“脱岗超时”、“倒完垃圾空照”、“坐刚玩手机”甚至“偷拍领导车辆”等,处罚金额在20元至50元不等。 评论区引发热议 高赞评论展示了“地主胜利,农民失败”的表情包, 有网友评论“14个巡查、3个环卫工,这岗位不就来了吗” “《偷拍领导车辆》” 邀您加入 『🌐新纪元 新闻中心』

Showing the 12 most recent of 434 posts we hold for @xinjiyuan9. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 5 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

🥗 视讯快报~密接巨变时代
@shixun160 · 22,955
Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 60 here — alongside 59 others — read 19 September 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“🌐 新纪元 新闻中心” (@xinjiyuan9), 8,613 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/xinjiyuan9.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.