Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 墙国之音

Channel

墙国之音

@chinafounder

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Posts recorded as deleted · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

14,594subscribers

-491 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001142168383
TypeChannel
Username@chinafounder
Descriptionhttps://x.com/chinesefounder 兄弟爬山, 各自努力。
CreatedBetween 1 June 2017 and 30 September 2020 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live11 November 2026
Measurements held61
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 11 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/chinafounder

Topic

Politics & activism — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

14,59115,08514,83814,5946 August 202611 November 2026
61 measurements spanning 97 days, net -491. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 14,517–15,159 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 61
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
11 Nov 2026, 08:4814,594+3
9 Nov 2026, 17:4914,591-16
8 Nov 2026, 10:1514,607-10
7 Nov 2026, 05:3914,617-10
4 Nov 2026, 04:5614,627-15
3 Nov 2026, 06:4114,642-2
2 Nov 2026, 07:4614,644-5
1 Nov 2026, 08:5114,649+1
31 Oct 2026, 06:2514,648+1
30 Oct 2026, 08:3114,647-6
29 Oct 2026, 05:3014,653-6
28 Oct 2026, 03:3214,659-5
27 Oct 2026, 02:2814,664-5
26 Oct 2026, 04:2714,669-2
25 Oct 2026, 07:0514,671-9
24 Oct 2026, 04:0714,680-2
23 Oct 2026, 02:4914,682-10
21 Oct 2026, 23:0714,692-6
20 Oct 2026, 21:4114,698+2
19 Oct 2026, 19:2014,696first reading

Engagement

160 posts held, back to 13 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 76 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
3.17%
avg views ÷ 14,594 subscribers
Avg views / post
463
80 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.382%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
80
of 160 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 27 of 80 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 13 November 2026
Posts held160 (13 June 2026 – 13 November 2026)
Views total37,045
Reactions total59
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken13 Nov 2026, 19:54 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈18,400
Videos
≈4,720
Links
≈36

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 13 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
13m 54s
Average length
1m 33s

Measured directly from 9 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

280 reactions across 62 posts, in 17 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 30.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍8530.4%
❤5419.3%
😁4215.0%
🤣269.29%
🤡155.36%
💩145.00%
👏124.29%
💯93.21%
🤮93.21%
🤬51.79%
🤨20.714%
🤯20.714%
🌭10.357%
🔥10.357%
😱10.357%
🤪10.357%
🥰10.357%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 75 of the 160 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 280 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 160 most recent posts we hold, published 13 June 2026 to 13 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 23 of 80 posts held from the last 30 days (28.7%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

13 Nov 2026, 19:06 UTC38 viewsread 13 November 2026

美国情报机构是如何发现黄乐是中共间谍特务的? 始于2024年美国在东南亚的一次情报行动。当时,英伟达以及黄仁勋根本不是情报机构的目标。美国情报人员暗中监控一个奇怪的走私网络好长时间,因为这个网络似乎能轻而易举绕过美国严苛的出口管制。 一个名叫“黄乐”(人称爱丽丝·黄)的中国女人浮出水面,据称她曾是电视台记者,后来做证券投资。2023年,她突然悄无声息买下新加坡一家破产、无人问津的游戏公司,并将其更名为Megaspeed。美国情报机构将这名女子列为目标后,对其进行24小时监控。但就在这些监听过程中,发现一件极其可疑的事:这名女子与一名“美国极高级别公民”保持着持续、私密且违规的联系。 根据美国法律,在针对外国人的监听中,本国公民的身份会被隐去,但当国家安全受到威胁时,联邦法官就会签发特别身份披露令(Unmasking) —— 电话那头与北京特工窃窃私语的男人,正是英伟达CEO黄仁勋。 情报人员开始围绕黄仁勋展开秘密调查。就在美国…

13 Nov 2026, 19:06 UTC38 viewsread 13 November 2026

据透露,黄乐创办的一家公司获得了美国限制出口的Nvidia 芯片,这些芯片被安装在上海的数据中心。

13 Nov 2026, 18:56 UTC46 viewsread 13 November 2026
Video

特朗普总统谈因中共间谍事件辞职的黄仁勋

13 Nov 2026, 18:46 UTC55 viewsread 13 November 2026
Photo

美众议院三大委员会联合致信黄仁勋 外交事务委员会、对华特别委员会、情报委员会三大主席联名,要求英伟达创始人黄仁勋于12月1日接受闭门、有文字记录的访谈。 信中明确警告:若不配合,将直接发出传票强制出庭,并要求11月13日美东时间晚8点前书面确认,否则立即发传票。

13 Nov 2026, 18:35 UTC59 views0 reactionsread 13 November 2026
Photo

美国前国务卿彭培奥: 英伟达间谍丑闻凸显了中共渗透美国关键部门的决心,以便他们窃取信息和技术,并最终摧毁我们的文明。

13 Nov 2026, 18:08 UTC105 viewsread 13 November 2026
Photo

在英伟达周三的董事会上,黄仁勋一反常态,几乎崩溃。 知情人说,他当时看起来“broken and shattered”(破碎、崩溃),一贯强势的风格消失,开始说类似“whatever”(随便)和“I don’t care”(我不在乎)的话。在场的人看来,他已经放弃了。 董事会最终的投票结果,让黄仁勋别无选择,只能辞职(“left him no choice but to resign”)。

13 Nov 2026, 18:01 UTC99 viewsread 13 November 2026
Photo

这下墙国粉红还怎么吹?原来吹上天的所谓国产替代,无非就是靠间谍走私英伟达芯片,动用整个东南亚能动用的中共公司,只能说,中共间谍技术真是太遥遥领先了。

13 Nov 2026, 17:55 UTC98 views0 reactionsread 13 November 2026
Photo

竟然是黄乐她丈夫康伟介绍自己老婆给黄仁勋! 《华尔街日报》报道,英伟达CEO黄仁勋是经黄乐的丈夫康伟介绍认识黄乐的。 康伟还曾半开玩笑地对同事说,妻子是黄仁勋的私人助理。 康伟夫妇参与创办的新加坡公司Megaspeed后来成为英伟达云合作伙伴,获得优先采购芯片的机会,并在马来西亚为阿里巴巴提供算力。该公司将英伟达服务器运往中国。

13 Nov 2026, 17:50 UTC93 viewsread 13 November 2026
Photo

新加坡政府官方通报,黄乐曾因Megaspeed涉嫌采购服务器时虚假申报而接受调查。 警方于2025年6月24日扣留她的护照,今年2月26日归还。黄乐当天离开新加坡。 警方判断,她在接受问询时故意提供不实信息,以淡化自己在公司的角色,因此向她发出严厉警告,并禁止她再次入境。

13 Nov 2026, 17:42 UTC74 viewsread 13 November 2026
Photo

黄乐持有香港护照,现在出事儿了却跑到北京,不打自招了这是,间谍无疑

13 Nov 2026, 16:28 UTC126 views3 reactionsread 13 November 2026
Photo

黄乐跟过的大佬没有一个善终

👍3

Showing the 12 most recent of 160 posts we hold for @chinafounder. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts edited after publishing

@chinafounder edited 3 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
9 August 2026
Most recent edit
12 November 2026

Posts recorded as deleted after publishing

We recorded 1 post on @chinafounder as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.

A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.

First seen missing
11 August 2026
Most recent seen missing
11 August 2026
Median time before seen missing
4 days
Seen missing in the last 30 days
0

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

☠️三战快报☠️一级战备
@endofxi · 22,085
Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 49 here — alongside 48 others — read 23 September 2026
Ruters乳透社🐻
@Ruters0615 · 25,084
Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 40 here — alongside 39 others — read 14 September 2026
学习墙国🐸
@XueXi_China · 86,313
Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 48 here — alongside 47 others — read 17 August 2026
中国悲剧档案官方频道
@newszg_official · 156,309
Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 52 here — alongside 51 others — read 12 August 2026
🥗 视讯快报~密接巨变时代
@shixun160 · 22,693
Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 60 here — alongside 59 others — read 19 September 2026
影音中国(中国被禁的视频)
@TwtVideoOfChina · 78,507
Telegram ranks this channel #43 of 54 here — alongside 53 others — read 20 August 2026

This channel appears in 6 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“墙国之音” (@chinafounder), 14,594 subscribers as measured 11 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/chinafounder.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.