Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

🌐 朗月清風 時事資訊

@aznc4566

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

1,898subscribers

-5 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001806316348
TypeChannel
Username@aznc4566
CreatedBetween 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 13 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/aznc4566

Growth

1,8981,9031,900.57 August 2026 — 1,903 subscribers7 August 2026 — 1,903 subscribers10 August 2026 — 1,900 subscribers13 August 2026 — 1,898 subscribers7 August 202613 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 6 days, net -5. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,897–1,904 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Aug 2026, 08:271,898-2
10 Aug 2026, 16:081,900-3
7 Aug 2026, 10:161,903no change
7 Aug 2026, 10:041,903first reading

Engagement

12 posts held, back to 6 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
1.25%
avg views ÷ 1,898 subscribers
Avg views / post
23.8
12 posts measured
Reaction rate
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
12
of 12 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026
Posts held12 (6 August 20267 August 2026)
Views total285
Reactions total
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Aug 2026, 17:20 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
1m 09s
Average length
23s

Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Recent posts

6 Aug 2026, 09:34 UTC22 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

8月4日,央视网快看发布专家提示称,上班时间跑外卖、送快递或长期刷视频、看短剧等“摸鱼”行为,严重者可能会被用人单位合法辞退。 视频引发网友热议: “开始了,开始了” “摸鱼送外卖?好小众的词汇”、“翘班送外卖” “既然精确到这步,就要限制双方乱来”,呼吁严格落实加班费与拖欠工资的重罚机制。” 视频获得17.3万的转发量和3.6万的点赞量,评论区只有几十条。 source

6 Aug 2026, 09:34 UTC24 viewsread 7 August 2026
Video

网友投稿:上海世博文化公园附近一群警察协警围捕二轮骑手 source

6 Aug 2026, 09:34 UTC29 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

8月4日,学生举报:山西省临汾市尧都区临汾第一中学校提前开学 source

6 Aug 2026, 09:34 UTC36 viewsread 7 August 2026
Video

“狗可以叫,人不能说。” 近日,抖音上一段疫情期间“大狗戴口罩”的视频引起热议,但评论区仅剩41条评论。 source

6 Aug 2026, 09:34 UTC22 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

8月5日,网友曝光杭州东站枢纽党群服务中心:有人中暑想进去讨一杯水喝,却被赶了出去。 视频音频中疑似传出对讲机声音“爱咋的咋的”。 更讽刺的是,大厅墙上赫然写着标语“最伟大的力量是同心”。 source

6 Aug 2026, 09:34 UTC16 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

“文革回来了吗?” 近日网友分享了一段小学生跳忠字舞的视频,引发关注。 近年来中国的社交媒体上越来越多的出现小孩子跳忠字舞的视频,并且得到官方宣扬。 source

6 Aug 2026, 09:34 UTC17 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

“打码的公示” 8月5日,河南安阳滑县网友发现,当地人才和就业服务中心公布的“2026年7月公益性岗位补贴发放表”中,领取补贴人员的姓名均被打码。 网友质疑公示一边声称“接受群众监督”,一边又将最关键的姓名信息遮挡。 source

6 Aug 2026, 09:34 UTC17 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

8月4日,湖南张家界遭遇强降雨。 多段现场视频显示,城区多处道路被浑浊洪水淹没,部分路段水流湍急,街道、商铺及广场出现严重积水,多辆汽车被淹至车门甚至车窗附近,电动车在水中难以通行。 source

6 Aug 2026, 09:34 UTC19 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

8月5日,有网友发视频称,部分媒体开始将“竹知了”相关内容与“境外势力”联系起来,几千赞和转发的视频,评论区却仅剩9条。 source

Showing the 12 most recent of 12 posts we hold for @aznc4566. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 429,098 of 1,480,688entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“🌐 朗月清風 時事資訊” (@aznc4566), 1,898 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/aznc4566.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.