Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

地球正義聯盟~資料館

@EarthJusticeLeague_DataLibrary

On this record: Also posting the same content · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

9,472subscribers

-13 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001700237518
TypeChannel
Username@EarthJusticeLeague_DataLibrary
Description《生命影響生命》 活出意義。發出亮光 Earth Justice League~Data Library ➡️ https://t.me/EarthJusticeLeague_DataLibrary Earth Justice League ➡️ https://t.me/EarthJusticeLeague X: ➡️ https://x.com/ImanuelAarde Patreon: ➡️ https://patreon.com/EarthJusticeLeague
Created9 October 2021measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 August 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 13 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/EarthJusticeLeague_DataLibrary

Also posting the same content

This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 1 other registered channel, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.

Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.

Growth

9,4729,4859,478.56 August 2026 — 9,485 subscribers6 August 2026 — 9,485 subscribers7 August 2026 — 9,483 subscribers10 August 2026 — 9,481 subscribers13 August 2026 — 9,472 subscribers6 August 202613 August 2026
5 measurements spanning 7 days, net -13. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 9,470–9,487 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Aug 2026, 14:369,472-9
10 Aug 2026, 07:329,481-2
7 Aug 2026, 12:419,483-2
6 Aug 2026, 16:409,485no change
6 Aug 2026, 16:399,485first reading

Engagement

70 posts held, back to 5 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 16 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
4.58%
avg views ÷ 9,472 subscribers
Avg views / post
434
35 posts measured
Reaction rate
3.83%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
70
of 70 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 15 August 2026
Posts held70 (5 August 202615 August 2026)
Views total15,178
Reactions total581
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken15 Aug 2026, 20:57 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
9,010
Videos
6,670
Links
7,570

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 15 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
32m 48s
Average length
1m 38s

Measured directly from 20 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

581 reactions across 35 posts, in 27 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 18.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍11018.9%
🔥8013.8%
7713.3%
🤬498.43%
😈427.23%
💯396.71%
🙏335.68%
😡233.96%
🏆223.79%
183.10%
🫡172.93%
🙈162.75%
😱132.24%
🕊81.38%
🙉71.20%
💔50.861%
😭40.688%
👏30.516%
😁30.516%
😨30.516%
7 further kinds91.55%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 35 of the 70 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 581reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 70 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 15 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 35 we hold a reading for · 3%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @EarthJusticeLeague_DataLibrary. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 70 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 5 August 2026 to 15 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

15 Aug 2026, 19:20 UTC84 views5 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Photo

🚨「上帝公式 - 意識全像模型」證實💥宇宙並「不在外面」而在「你裡面」|你並非住在宇宙中的肉身,而是透過肉身在體驗宇宙|不是我們擁有靈魂:是靈魂擁有我們 💥我們活在「超高智慧模擬」之中?!一位被中情局封存的天才,早在半世紀前,便說出了關鍵真相。 🔔越來越多不同領域的專家、科學家、工程師、哲學家的證詞,都指向同一個令人既不安、又興奮的結論:「我們很可能活在一個由『超高智慧』所建構的模擬現實中。」 🔔#馬斯克(#ElonMusk)早在2016年「#CodeConference」上說過:「我們處於『真實世界』的機率,大概只有十億分之一。」 他的邏輯很簡單—— 40年前的遊戲,還是兩個長方形加一個點的《Pong》,如今已是寫實3D、數百萬人同時在線的世界。若科技繼續進步,未來必定出現與現實無法區分的模擬。 🔹到那時,會有數十億台電腦在運行這些模擬,如果我們剛好活在「唯一真實」那一層的機率,自然是微乎其微。他不是一時衝口而出,自

11🏆1👍1💯1

15 Aug 2026, 14:07 UTC363 views12 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Video

矩陣之外…. 你每一次的覺醒 始於一個謊言的爆破。 而每個謊言的爆破 又會造成的一道裂縫。 越多的裂縫 逃出生天的機會越高…. ➰➰➰➰➰➰➰➰➰ 以馬 #矩陣 #覺醒 #謊言

6👍2🕊2🏆1💯1

15 Aug 2026, 10:28 UTC204 views16 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Forwarded from @moralmediaPhoto

🌀人間閉環…. 強者生於亂世 盛世成於強者 弱者生於盛世 亂世始於弱者…. "Hard times create strong men. Strong men create good times. Good times create weak men. And, weak men create hard times." ➰➰➰➰➰➰➰➰➰ 以馬

👍83🏆2💯21

15 Aug 2026, 06:49 UTC246 views19 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Forwarded from @moralmediaPhoto

「愚者視他人之敗為是非, 智者珍視為己身之預警。」 “𝘈 𝘧𝘰𝘰𝘭 𝘴𝘦𝘦𝘴 𝘢𝘯𝘰𝘵𝘩𝘦𝘳 𝘮𝘢𝘯’𝘴 𝘥𝘰𝘸𝘯𝘧𝘢𝘭𝘭 𝘢𝘴 𝘢 𝘵𝘰𝘱𝘪𝘤 𝘰𝘧 𝘥𝘪𝘴𝘤𝘶𝘴𝘴𝘪𝘰𝘯. 𝘈 𝘸𝘪𝘴𝘦 𝘮𝘢𝘯 𝘴𝘦𝘦𝘴 𝘪𝘵 𝘢𝘴 𝘢 𝘸𝘢𝘳𝘯𝘪𝘯𝘨 𝘵𝘰 𝘩𝘪𝘮𝘴𝘦𝘭𝘧.” ➰➰➰➰➰➰➰➰➰ 以馬

👍104💯21🏆1🫡1

14 Aug 2026, 17:11 UTC738 views17 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Photo

左派精心包裝的「當紅花瓶」#AOC:「It Girl」的野心與美國內部敵人的毒害|不能輕視的美國國內「社會主義收割期」…. 2018年,當時年僅28歲的亞歷山大·奧卡西奧-科爾特斯(Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez - AOC),以一名前「酒保」的身份,突然擊敗民主黨眾議院排名第四的現任議員,一躍成為全國焦點。 她沒有奧巴馬那種精英學歷背景,卻有著「同樣的大膽」—— 當時她公開主張「廢除 #移民及海關執法局(#ICE)、推行政府保證就業,並以「道德旗幟鮮明」來辯護自己那些被外界視為極端的立場。 她迅速組建「小隊」(The Squad),與一群志同道合的「激進左派」聯手,成為民主黨內部最醒目的社會主義符號。 過去幾年,她在國會聽證會上,常扮演強勢「女老闆」,同時又在TikTok上,展示相對柔和的一面。 到了2026年,這位36歲的「社會主義者」明顯開始從她的導師:#伯尼桑德斯(#BernieSanders

🤬7😈32🔥2🤡1😡1🙏1

14 Aug 2026, 12:28 UTC746 views22 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Photo

一場「完美的集體儀式」: 日食。羊兒。護目鏡玩具 🔹8月12日,人們被告知: 「不可以不戴保護裝備看日蝕。」 於是,整個羊群都裝備十足。 成千上萬隻「乖巧的羊兒們」,清一色戴著那副廉價紙框「特製」護目鏡,整裝待發,「齊齊整整」一起仰望天空: 🔔「等待黑暗降臨的一刻,然後一起歡呼。」 🔹畫面宏偉、統一、甚至帶著一點宗教意味般的「神聖」。 「他們都覺得很有趣, 我卻覺得有點嚇人.…」 先不說,事後滿街都是被丟棄的「特製護目鏡」—— 堆滿街邊垃圾桶,更散落在馬路上,像一場剛散場的廉價派對。有人甚至懶得丟進桶子,直接踩過去。 🔹這就是「眼鏡羊群」的「完整生命週期」: 🔹被告知 → 服從 → 合照 → 丟棄 → 再等待「下一個指令」。 看點可從「羊兒們的有趣行為」切入,甚至可以就此寫一份研究報告。大多數羊兒們,從來沒詢問過:這副護目鏡,跟家中的太陽眼鏡到底有什麼不同?可以直接用太陽眼鏡嗎? 🔹「不!羊兒們喜歡的是認同、和

👍11💯42🔥21🏆1🙈1

Showing the 12 most recent of 70 posts we hold for @EarthJusticeLeague_DataLibrary. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 15,730 of 1,480,688entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 5 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“地球正義聯盟~資料館” (@EarthJusticeLeague_DataLibrary), 9,472 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/EarthJusticeLeague_DataLibrary.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.