Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Серьезный тестировщик 🐞

@serious_tester

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Stars · Advertising · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

30,380subscribers

-26 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001127737843
TypeChannel
Username@serious_tester
Created20 October 2017measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 August 2026
Measurements held11
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 14 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/serious_tester

Growth

30,38030,40630,3936 August 2026 — 30,406 subscribers6 August 2026 — 30,406 subscribers6 August 2026 — 30,405 subscribers7 August 2026 — 30,400 subscribers8 August 2026 — 30,393 subscribers9 August 2026 — 30,390 subscribers10 August 2026 — 30,388 subscribers11 August 2026 — 30,386 subscribers12 August 2026 — 30,387 subscribers13 August 2026 — 30,383 subscribers14 August 2026 — 30,380 subscribers6 August 202614 August 2026
11 measurements spanning 8 days, net -26. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 30,376–30,410 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
14 Aug 2026, 05:3830,380-3
13 Aug 2026, 01:2630,383-4
12 Aug 2026, 04:2330,387+1
11 Aug 2026, 06:1830,386-2
10 Aug 2026, 08:0030,388-2
9 Aug 2026, 10:3230,390-3
8 Aug 2026, 07:2230,393-7
7 Aug 2026, 09:0530,400-5
6 Aug 2026, 12:2030,405-1
6 Aug 2026, 02:3030,406no change
6 Aug 2026, 02:2930,406first reading

Engagement

24 posts held, back to 11 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 19 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
17.0%
avg views ÷ 30,380 subscribers
Avg views / post
5,150
21 posts measured
Reaction rate
0%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
21
of 24 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 1 of 21 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 August 2026
Posts held24 (11 July 202611 August 2026)
Views total108,210
Reactions total0
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken14 Aug 2026, 02:23 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
25s
Average length
25s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 24 we hold a reading for · 4%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @serious_tester. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 24 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 11 July 2026 to 11 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Advertising

Ad load
8.33%
2 of 24 posts carry an ad marker
Regulatory tokens
2
posts carrying an erid · 2 distinct tokens
Median views · ads
5,710
over 2 measured posts
Median views · rest
5,310
over 22 measured posts

An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.

This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor.A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.

Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.

Advertising tokens recorded on this entry
eridPostsFirst seenLast seen
2VtzqwrrRJr123 July 202623 July 2026
2VtzqxXfpqx114 July 202614 July 2026

A token repeated across several posts is one advertising contract placed more than once, which is what the identifier is for. The strings are reproduced exactly as they appeared in the post or in its click-through URL and are not validated against any registry — we record the marker a channel published, and whether it resolves to a real contract is a question for the register that issued it.

Measured over the 24 most recent posts we hold, published 11 July 2026 to 11 August 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.

Recent posts

11 Aug 2026, 09:10 UTC≈2,600 viewsread 14 August 2026

Помешательство вокруг ИИ парализовало принятие решений Читать...

10 Aug 2026, 14:55 UTC≈3,190 viewsread 14 August 2026

Обновлённая аналитика по рынку труда. Ледниковый период для топ-менеджеров: что реально происходит с наймом? Читать...

8 Aug 2026, 14:05 UTC≈3,890 viewsread 14 August 2026

Планирование четвёртого поколения: почему списки дел не работают Читать...

6 Aug 2026, 09:40 UTC≈5,250 viewsread 14 August 2026

Токены в ИИ и оптимизация промптов: как я сэкономила 50% бюджета и перестала здороваться с ChatGPT Читать...

3 Aug 2026, 09:37 UTC≈5,810 viewsread 14 August 2026

7 месяцев вайбкодинга: как в одиночку делать то, что раньше требовало команду Читать...

2 Aug 2026, 10:06 UTC≈5,480 viewsread 14 August 2026

Как мы сократили подготовку к тестированию на 70% с помощью AI-агентов Читать...

1 Aug 2026, 08:26 UTC≈4,790 viewsread 14 August 2026

Мы делили апельсин: как связать ручное и автоматизированное тестирование в единую систему качества Читать...

31 Jul 2026, 08:31 UTC≈4,800 viewsread 14 August 2026

Почему руководители плохо руководят Читать...

30 Jul 2026, 07:54 UTC≈5,240 viewsread 14 August 2026

LLM обесценили половину вашего опыта. Хорошая новость — не ту половину Читать...

29 Jul 2026, 09:03 UTC≈4,810 viewsread 14 August 2026
Photo

Ещё не все языки программирования выучил, ещё один — и тогда пойдёшь искать работу? А там: пройдите стажировку за печеньки 3 месяца, и только потом статус джуна с оплатой до 100 000 ₽. Сомнительный план. Сережа так и делал. Самоучка, 4 месяца откликов, ноль ответов. Каждое утро — открыть сайт, отправить 10 резюме, закрыть ноутбук и ждать письмо "вы нам не подходите". Проблема была не в знаниях, а в устаревшем стеке

28 Jul 2026, 07:54 UTC≈4,700 viewsread 14 August 2026

Как QA я все равно пишу документацию, но с ИИ трачу на нее часы, а не дни Читать...

27 Jul 2026, 09:13 UTC≈4,840 viewsread 14 August 2026

Когда 200 OK опаснее ошибки Читать...

Showing the 12 most recent of 24 posts we hold for @serious_tester. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 665,150 of 1,189,255entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Серьезный тестировщик 🐞” (@serious_tester), 30,380 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/serious_tester.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.