Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Алексей | AQA PROKA4

Channel

Алексей | AQA PROKA4

@qa_proka4

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

3,383subscribers

-23 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001266281977
TypeChannel
Username@qa_proka4
CreatedBetween 1 March 2018 and 31 August 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live28 September 2026
Measurements held14
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 28 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/qa_proka4

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 14 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 44% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

3,3773,4063,391.57 August 2026 — 3,406 subscribers8 August 2026 — 3,403 subscribers11 August 2026 — 3,399 subscribers14 August 2026 — 3,398 subscribers17 August 2026 — 3,399 subscribers20 August 2026 — 3,403 subscribers24 August 2026 — 3,399 subscribers27 August 2026 — 3,392 subscribers30 August 2026 — 3,387 subscribers6 September 2026 — 3,384 subscribers11 September 2026 — 3,383 subscribers14 September 2026 — 3,377 subscribers18 September 2026 — 3,378 subscribers28 September 2026 — 3,383 subscribers3,3837 August 202628 September 2026
14 measurements spanning 52 days, net -23. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 3,373–3,410 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
28 Sept 2026, 13:173,383+5
18 Sept 2026, 19:373,378+1
14 Sept 2026, 21:413,377-6
11 Sept 2026, 11:593,383-1
6 Sept 2026, 22:403,384-3
30 Aug 2026, 02:453,387-5
27 Aug 2026, 12:083,392-7
24 Aug 2026, 06:173,399-4
20 Aug 2026, 20:253,403+4
17 Aug 2026, 13:573,399+1
14 Aug 2026, 14:073,398-1
11 Aug 2026, 13:073,399-4
8 Aug 2026, 11:233,403-3
7 Aug 2026, 11:483,406first reading

Engagement

21 posts held, back to 7 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 3 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 21 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

510 reactions across 17 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 60.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥31060.8%
❤10821.2%
👍509.80%
❤‍🔥142.75%
🤣122.35%
🍾40.784%
👀40.784%
😁40.784%
👎20.392%
💅20.392%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 21 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 510 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 21 most recent posts we hold, published 7 June 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

7 Aug 2026, 19:21 UTC424 views42 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Как думаете, стоит? или не стоит?)

🔥34👀4❤2👎2

6 Aug 2026, 15:32 UTC798 views24 reactionsread 7 August 2026

⚡️Такс, это самая первая версия! Жду фидбек) Пока только 30 слотов по 1 бесплатному интервью https://ace-interviewer.com Промокод на интервью: WELCOMEGUYS

🔥20❤4

31 Jul 2026, 16:21 UTC≈1,420 views53 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

⚡️Через пару дней выкатываю

🔥40❤‍🔥13

18 Jul 2026, 17:09 UTC≈2,230 views47 reactionsread 7 August 2026

⚡️Я очень давно хотел выложить этот курс. И вот он на Stepik. "Автоматизация на языке бизнеса" Сразу честно: видео здесь нет. Это не тот курс, к которому вы привыкли. Всего четыре урока - но глубоких: цифры, формулы, правила и подходы, которые выводят на другой уровень понимания профессии. ROI автоматизации до доллара, матрица «автоматизировать или нет», Risk-Based Coverage, готовый питч для руководства. Плюс шабло…

🔥36❤11

7 Jul 2026, 21:41 UTC≈2,030 views83 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @aiproka4

⚡️ Это первый ролик на канале. И первый урок курса по Claude Code. Никаких «подпишись, потом что-нибудь выложу» — контент уже здесь: 9 минут, после которых у вас стоит Claude Code и вы понимаете сессию и контекст - то, без чего агентом пользуются наугад, а потом жалуются, что «ИИ тупит». Внутри: установка с нуля, первый запрос, /clear и /compact без сжигания токенов впустую. 📎 Методичка в PDF прилагается: конспект…

🔥72❤7🍾4

24 Jun 2026, 15:22 UTC≈2,010 views27 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @purelyworkPhoto

Мы устали от ХАХА, давайте что-то новое? Абсолютно понимаю, невозможно так долго грызть эти алгоритмы умного поиска, авторазбора и ИИ-помощника. Остановите эту шарманку! Давайте тестировать! Я верю в то, что ХАХА подвинут, ровно потому, что платформа для работодателей и платформа для соискателей живут разной жизнью и перенос в сторону b2b аукнется ослаблением соискательской базы. Ведь уже сейчас платформа продает м…

🔥18👍6😁2❤1

21 Jun 2026, 20:56 UTC≈1,360 views21 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @aiproka4File

Как и обещал, по итогу постов про Skills дропаю вам методичку, чтобы было все в одном месте🤟🏻

❤21

21 Jun 2026, 20:56 UTC≈1,550 views0 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Те кому интересен AI залетайте в канал🤟🏻

16 Jun 2026, 21:59 UTC≈2,150 views15 reactionsread 7 August 2026
File

Быстренько прошелся, в целом мини-ачивка) Как говорится "Why not?" Практически все я уже знал до курса🤟

🔥13💅2

15 Jun 2026, 06:44 UTC≈2,050 viewsread 7 August 2026

Тем временем новый канал наполняется очень крутой инфой! https://t.me/aiproka4

14 Jun 2026, 12:26 UTC≈1,830 views37 reactionsread 7 August 2026

🤟🏻Наверное, наиболее целесообразно написать эту мысль отдельным постом Ребят, сейчас самое время погружаться в автоматизацию, погружаться в код, изучать, как все это работает, пока это время еще есть. Писать руками, писать функции, методы, обертки, фреймворки. Все это нужно делать руками, чтобы потом вы все это могли выдавать в промт, могли генерировать мысли, идеи, архитектурно правильные и качественно. Это очень …

🔥25❤6🤣3😁2❤‍🔥1

13 Jun 2026, 16:17 UTC≈1,680 views25 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Коротко расскажу чем сейчас занимаюсь, чтобы было понятно, куда я и что) Сейчас я - AI Transformation Lead. Если по-человечески: я отвечаю за то, как инженерная команда реально начинает делегировать работу AI-агентам. Не «давайте поиграемся с ChatGPT на созвоне», а внутри тех инструментов, в которых люди уже сидят каждый день - Jira, GitLab, Confluence. Я спроектировал и собрал штуку под названием Magnum Studio. П…

🔥21❤4

Showing the 12 most recent of 21 posts we hold for @qa_proka4. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

7 Jun 2026, 17:28 UTCAnonymous Poll152 voters

✏️Давно гуляет мысль сделать оффлайн ивент в Варшаве Кто из варшавы/Польши? P.S знаю, что не так многое людей, но точно есть люди

  1. Дааа7%
  2. Не смогу быть(93%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 21 most recent posts we hold, published 7 June 2026 to 7 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

QA Sklad - Склад тестировщика
@qa_sklad · 23,330
Telegram ranks this channel #47 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 18 September 2026
Artsiom Rusau QA Life - Тестировщик с нуля
@qachanell · 30,259
Telegram ranks this channel #55 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 7 September 2026
Работа для тестировщиков. QA
@qajoboffer · 20,393
Telegram ranks this channel #56 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 27 September 2026
Серьезный тестировщик 🐞
@serious_tester · 30,126
Telegram ranks this channel #66 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 7 September 2026
Тестировщик от бога
@godoftesting · 29,517
Telegram ranks this channel #69 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 8 September 2026
Job for QA
@forallqa · 22,530
Telegram ranks this channel #88 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 20 September 2026

This channel appears in 6 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 28 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Алексей | AQA PROKA4” (@qa_proka4), 3,383 subscribers as measured 28 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/qa_proka4.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.