Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Автоматизация тестирования

Channel

Автоматизация тестирования

@automatedqa

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Advertising · Posts · Posts recorded as deleted · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

8,863subscribers

+111 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001838840529
TypeChannel
Username@automatedqa
DescriptionСправочник материалов по Автоматизации тестирования. Туториалы по всем основным технологиям. Книги и тесты для самопроверки. selenium, playwrite, pytest @viktorreh @aldrson
CreatedBetween 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live8 November 2026
Measurements held27
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 8 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/automatedqa

Topic

Technology — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 49% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

8,7508,8848,8176 August 2026 — 8,752 subscribers6 August 2026 — 8,752 subscribers6 August 2026 — 8,750 subscribers10 August 2026 — 8,754 subscribers13 August 2026 — 8,768 subscribers16 August 2026 — 8,759 subscribers20 August 2026 — 8,769 subscribers23 August 2026 — 8,767 subscribers26 August 2026 — 8,793 subscribers29 August 2026 — 8,832 subscribers1 September 2026 — 8,846 subscribers5 September 2026 — 8,842 subscribers10 September 2026 — 8,879 subscribers14 September 2026 — 8,876 subscribers18 September 2026 — 8,867 subscribers27 September 2026 — 8,874 subscribers5 October 2026 — 8,884 subscribers12 October 2026 — 8,883 subscribers15 October 2026 — 8,876 subscribers18 October 2026 — 8,878 subscribers21 October 2026 — 8,872 subscribers24 October 2026 — 8,864 subscribers27 October 2026 — 8,860 subscribers30 October 2026 — 8,854 subscribers2 November 2026 — 8,851 subscribers5 November 2026 — 8,856 subscribers8 November 2026 — 8,863 subscribers8,8636 August 20268 November 2026
27 measurements spanning 94 days, net +111. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 8,730–8,904 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 27
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
8 Nov 2026, 09:198,863+7
5 Nov 2026, 09:068,856+5
2 Nov 2026, 05:268,851-3
30 Oct 2026, 05:408,854-6
27 Oct 2026, 16:098,860-4
24 Oct 2026, 19:088,864-8
21 Oct 2026, 14:598,872-6
18 Oct 2026, 16:598,878+2
15 Oct 2026, 15:168,876-7
12 Oct 2026, 12:418,883-1
5 Oct 2026, 14:598,884+10
27 Sept 2026, 22:398,874+7
18 Sept 2026, 06:578,867-9
14 Sept 2026, 07:418,876-3
10 Sept 2026, 17:578,879+37
5 Sept 2026, 10:418,842-4
1 Sept 2026, 21:148,846+14
29 Aug 2026, 12:098,832+39
26 Aug 2026, 16:188,793+26
23 Aug 2026, 21:278,767first reading

Engagement

56 posts held, back to 14 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 48 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
15.3%
avg views ÷ 8,863 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,360
18 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.124%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
18
of 56 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 12 of 18 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 10 November 2026
Posts held56 (14 July 2026 – 10 November 2026)
Views total24,408
Reactions total21
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken11 Nov 2026, 13:00 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
380
Videos
14
Links
475

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 11 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

97 reactions across 31 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 49.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤4849.5%
👍2222.7%
❤‍🔥88.25%
🔥88.25%
👏77.22%
🌚22.06%
👌11.03%
👎11.03%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 38 of the 56 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 97 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 56 most recent posts we hold, published 14 July 2026 to 10 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Advertising

Ad load
5.36%
3 of 56 posts carry an ad marker
Regulatory tokens
3
posts carrying an erid · 3 distinct tokens
Median views · ads
987
over 3 measured posts
Median views · rest
1,660
over 53 measured posts

An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.

This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor. A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.

Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.

Advertising tokens recorded on this entry
eridPostsFirst seenLast seen
2W5zFGXQtEE110 November 202610 November 2026
2W5zFJ8opPj114 July 202614 July 2026
CQH36pWzJqVG5wu4X7FBgi3i3jfF49iqBTyJibW6pWgaGe125 August 202625 August 2026

A token repeated across several posts is one advertising contract placed more than once, which is what the identifier is for. The strings are reproduced exactly as they appeared in the post or in its click-through URL and are not validated against any registry — we record the marker a channel published, and whether it resolves to a real contract is a question for the register that issued it.

Measured over the 56 most recent posts we hold, published 14 July 2026 to 10 November 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 18 posts held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

10 Nov 2026, 16:54 UTC687 views0 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Photo

Git для профессионального программиста Автор: Чакон С. Год издания: 2024 #qa #git #ru Скачать книгу

10 Nov 2026, 13:40 UTC810 views0 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Advertisementerid 2W5zFGXQtEEPhoto

Доклады про QA и демостенд с железом YADRO — 19 ноября в Москве и онлайн Приглашаем на YADRO QA Meetup. Приходите послушать, с какими задачами сталкиваются инженеры, а также пообщаться со спикерами и тестировщиками из других компаний. Что в программе: - TESTY TMS: что нового в открытой системе управления тестированием и с какими сложностями столкнулась команда разработки. - Системы хранения данных: как они устроены…

9 Nov 2026, 07:56 UTC935 viewsread 11 November 2026
Photo

✨ Вакансии для автоматизаторов за неделю: ⭐️ Middle/Senior QA Automation Java IT Atlasnet Middle · Remote · РФ · до ₽350 000 ⭐️ Fullstack QA C# Quickly Search Remote · Россия · от ₽200 000 ⭐️ Junior QA Engineer (Manual + AI Automation) Icons8 Junior · Remote · от ₽50 000 ⭐️ QA Engineer (Manual + Automation Java) Сбер Hybrid · Москва ⭐️ Fullstack QA Java Квикли Сеч ИТ Hybrid · Санкт-Петербург · от ₽230 000 ⭐️ Py…

6 Nov 2026, 15:15 UTC≈1,080 views0 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Photo

📌 Статьи о метриках в тестировании 🎌 Важные метрики тестирования программного обеспечения. В статье на примерах и графиках рассмотрены метрики, используемые в тестировании программного обеспечения, и их правильное применение. 🎌 QA-метрики: что на самом деле важно измерять и как в этом помогает TMS. Когда интуитивного тестирования уже недостаточно и качество ведет себя непредсказуемо, метрики перестают быть формальн…

2 Nov 2026, 07:40 UTC≈1,360 viewsread 11 November 2026
Photo

⭐️ Вакансии для автоматизаторов за неделю: 📥 Fullstack QA Engineer Сбербанк Страхование Hybrid · Москва · от ₽160 000 📥 Fullstack QA C# Quickly Search Remote · РФ · от ₽200 000 📥 Full-stack QA Engineer (Java, Python) QA Service Lab Middle · Remote 📥 AQA Engineer (Python) Bell Integrator Middle · Onsite · Москва · от ₽190 000 📥 QA Automation Engineer (Python) Московская Биржа Middle · Hybrid · Москва 📥 QA Automa…

31 Oct 2026, 14:20 UTC≈1,290 views2 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Photo

Как освоить пирамиду автоматизации тестирования — умный подход к тестам #читать Неорганизованный или несбалансированный набор тестов может привести к медленной обратной связи, высоким затратам на поддержку и недостоверным результатам. Один из лучших способов избежать этих проблем — понять и правильно применять пирамиду автоматизации тестирования. Читать далее

👍2

29 Oct 2026, 12:39 UTC≈1,380 views0 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Photo

CI/CD Pipeline Using Jenkins Unleashed Автор: Pranoday Dingare Год издания: 2022 #qa #en Скачать книгу

27 Oct 2026, 11:53 UTC≈1,550 views1 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Photo

✔️ Полезные статьи о работе с Selenium 🚩 Playwright vs Selenium: гайд по современной автоматизации тестирования. Selenium — лидер в области веб-автоматизации, но в последнее время его старается подвинуть Playwright. Из этой статьи вы узнаете, возможно ли это, и почему. 🚩 Как выбрать дату в Selenium WebDriver. Разбор на примере, как выбрать дату из DatePicker/Calendar в Selenium Webdriver. 🚩 Ожидания в Selenium для…

❤‍🔥1

26 Oct 2026, 07:06 UTC≈1,410 viewsread 11 November 2026
Photo

🔥 Вакансии для автоматизаторов за неделю: 📥 QA Automation Engineer Top Selection Remote · РФ · ₽180 000 – 190 000 📥 QA Fullstack C# Centicore Middle · Remote · ₽200 000 – 280 000 📥 AQA Engineer (LLM) Цифровые привычки Contract · Remote · Москва, Россия · ₽190 000 – 230 000 📥 AQA (Ai sales) Hybrid · Москва 📥 Автотестировщик (AQA Python/Java) Сбер Onsite · Москва 📥 Middle/Senior QA Automation Java IT Atlasnet Mid…

23 Oct 2026, 09:06 UTC≈1,530 views4 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Photo

Лучшие практики Playwright и 10 ошибок ИИ-агентов #читать #playwright Искусственный интеллект может написать 50 Playwright-тестов за минуту. Это кажется очень быстро. Но затем эти тесты случайным образом терпят неудачу, и никто не знает почему. В этом руководстве перечислены 10 лучших практик, обеспечивающих стабильность тестов. Для всех приведены небольшие примеры. Читать далее

👍4

Showing the 12 most recent of 56 posts we hold for @automatedqa. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts recorded as deleted after publishing

We recorded 3 posts on @automatedqa as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.

A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.

First seen missing
12 August 2026
Most recent seen missing
8 November 2026
Median time before seen missing
8 days
Seen missing in the last 30 days
1

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

15 Oct 2026, 09:26 UTCAnonymous Poll1,150 voters approx.

Где ты сейчас ищешь работу? (Страны / регионы)

  1. Сейчас не ищу работу13%
  2. в РФ55%
  3. в СНГ36%
  4. в Европе32%
  5. в Азии / Ближний Восток15%
  6. в Америке (США + Латам)16%

The shares total 167%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 56 most recent posts we hold, published 14 July 2026 to 10 November 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 7 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Работа для тестировщиков. QA
@qajoboffer · 20,811
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 27 September 2026
QA Sklad - Склад тестировщика
@qa_sklad · 23,087
Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 18 September 2026
Серьезный тестировщик 🐞
@serious_tester · 29,726
Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 7 September 2026
Тестировщик от бога
@godoftesting · 29,147
Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 8 September 2026
Artsiom Rusau QA Life - Тестировщик с нуля
@qachanell · 30,141
Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 7 September 2026
Job for QA
@forallqa · 22,934
Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 20 September 2026
Stepik – онлайн-курсы
@stepik_courses · 28,865
Telegram ranks this channel #44 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 16 September 2026
КЛУБ | ENGLISH GALAXY | АНГЛИЙСКИЙ ЯЗЫК ПО ПЛЕЙЛИСТАМ
@englishgalaxy_school · 79,402
Telegram ranks this channel #55 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 19 August 2026
IT - стажировки и обучение
@it_interns · 31,662
Telegram ranks this channel #70 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 6 September 2026
IT Events 📆 АйТи События
@itevents · 17,272
Telegram ranks this channel #73 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 30 September 2026

This channel appears in 10 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Автоматизация тестирования” (@automatedqa), 8,863 subscribers as measured 8 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/automatedqa.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.