Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 📚 ProTestingInfo 🔷 Канал по тестированию 📚

Channel

📚 ProTestingInfo 🔷 Канал по тестированию 📚

@protestinginfo

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

14,848subscribers

-30 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001472805556
TypeChannel
Username@protestinginfo
Description📌Информация для начинающих и для коллег в области QA, для личного закрепления знаний. 📌Теория, тесты, практика Ментор-Консультация - 6 тр/час @feedback_protestinginfo Курсы https://taplink.cc/protestinginfo Вопросы @nadin_qa РКН: https://clck.ru/3FWD9v
CreatedBetween 1 April 2019 and 30 September 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live10 November 2026
Measurements held61
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 10 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/protestinginfo

Topic

Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 98% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

14,84114,91414,877.514,8487 August 202610 November 2026
61 measurements spanning 96 days, net -30. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 14,830–14,925 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 61
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
10 Nov 2026, 20:3714,848-5
9 Nov 2026, 08:4714,853-4
8 Nov 2026, 00:1114,857+3
6 Nov 2026, 19:4714,854-1
5 Nov 2026, 18:1714,855-7
4 Nov 2026, 15:5614,862+2
3 Nov 2026, 14:2914,860+1
2 Nov 2026, 11:3014,859+4
1 Nov 2026, 10:0514,855-12
31 Oct 2026, 10:2914,867-2
30 Oct 2026, 07:0614,869-12
29 Oct 2026, 09:3814,881-4
28 Oct 2026, 11:1814,885-3
27 Oct 2026, 13:0814,888+2
26 Oct 2026, 13:1614,886+14
25 Oct 2026, 11:0914,872+8
24 Oct 2026, 08:3014,864+7
23 Oct 2026, 07:2714,857+2
22 Oct 2026, 07:2814,855+2
21 Oct 2026, 01:5814,853first reading

Engagement

53 posts held, back to 31 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 72 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
7.20%
avg views ÷ 14,848 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,070
20 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.768%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
20
of 53 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 19 of 20 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 November 2026
Posts held53 (31 July 2026 – 11 November 2026)
Views total21,380
Reactions total160
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken12 Nov 2026, 07:10 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈1,770
Videos
≈222
Links
≈1,330

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
2m 45s
Average length
41s

Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

584 reactions across 47 posts, in 22 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 26.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤15426.4%
🔥11219.2%
👍10918.7%
🎉6310.8%
❤‍🔥579.76%
✍376.34%
🙏111.88%
custom 528972275587116290081.37%
👨‍💻61.03%
⚡40.685%
👌30.514%
💯30.514%
😎30.514%
🌚20.342%
🏆20.342%
👏20.342%
😇20.342%
🤗20.342%
🆒10.171%
💊10.171%
2 further kinds20.342%

Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it is Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 48 of the 53 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 584 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 53 most recent posts we hold, published 31 July 2026 to 11 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 1 of 20 posts held from the last 30 days (5.00%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

11 Nov 2026, 17:24 UTC549 viewsread 12 November 2026
Forwarded from @DoQATMSPhoto

В DoQA вышел MCP-сервер: с тестами теперь можно работать прямо из чата с AI-ассистентом. 🔌 Он доступен и в облачной, и в коробочной версии, подключение в обеих одинаковое. Достаточно отправить ассистенту ссылку на инструкцию, остальное он сделает сам: спросит адрес DoQA, попросит токен и проверит подключение. После этого с тестами можно работать прямо из чата: разобрать упавший прогон, найти дубли в библиотеке, пон…

11 Nov 2026, 17:22 UTC534 views12 reactionsread 12 November 2026
Photo

Буду по-тихоньку рассказывать про скиллы, вообще акцент на gigacode, планирую проводить вебинары на канале, и сформировать группу по обучению написания скиллов или их использования. Сейчас немного про Claude, но вообще курс на gigacode + MCP + skills и если повезет SDD😁 Хочу начать с DoQA, там как раз появился MCP А так как с DoQA мы партнеры, и я планирую возобновить вебинары, собираюсь пойти к коллегам на запрос пр…

👍8❤2❤‍🔥2

10 Nov 2026, 15:49 UTC766 views3 reactionsread 12 November 2026

Всем привет, продлила скидку APISQL20 - 20% СКИДКА ДО 12 НОЯБРЯ 2026г. 📌 Что будет на курсе: • API тестирование (REST) — Postman, Swagger • SQL от базового до JOIN — PostgreSQL, ClickHouse • Redis — работа с кэшем • Kafka — проверка асинхронных запросов Планы - и уже есть вебинар рассказывать про ИИ-агенты, MCP, работа с коллекциями Готова направить и поддержать на каждом шаге. Прямая ссылка для оплаты (можно расс…

❤1❤‍🔥1👌1

10 Nov 2026, 09:04 UTC938 views4 reactionsread 12 November 2026

🧪 Привет! Это Podlodka QA Crew Завтра, 11 ноября, в 19:00 мск проводим открытую сессию, круглый стол «Готовы ли мы к внедрению AI в QA» AI-инструменты в тестировании уже внедряют почти все, но мало кто разбирает, где они реально помогают, а где добавляют рисков. Обсудим это с экспертами-практиками: — 💡 какие возможности AI уже даёт QA-командам; — ⚠️ где у таких интеграций слабые места и какие угрозы они несут; — 🧩 …

✍3❤1

8 Nov 2026, 09:00 UTC999 views9 reactionsread 12 November 2026
Forwarded from @info_course_protestinginfo

Всем привет! Промокоды на ноябрь !💙💙💙 FRIDAY20 20% до 30 ноября 2026 г. в 23:00 GMT+3 Практический курс по gRPC API для тестировщиков - https://stepik.org/a/254052?promo=a7930dfb4a683c11 Практический курс по GraphQL API для тестировщиков - https://stepik.org/a/252924?promo=7324f18fd5686879 Тесты по тестированию ПО для подготовки к собеседованиям - https://stepik.org/a/276076?promo=9203bb0662f09330 (промокод FRID…

👍7❤1❤‍🔥1

6 Nov 2026, 18:35 UTC≈1,170 views16 reactionsread 12 November 2026
Photo

5 САЙТОВ, СОЗДАННЫХ СПЕЦИАЛЬНО ДЛЯ АВТОМАТИЗАЦИИ 👇 А еще делать автотесты через ИИ-агенты Хочешь начать писать автотесты, но не на чем тренироваться? Решение есть: используй специальные сайты-песочницы. Они стабильны, легальны для тестирования и созданы именно для отработки навыков Selenium, Playwright или Cypress. А по API отдельно сделаю информацию. 1️⃣ the-internet.herokuapp.com Классика от Dave Haeffner. Десят…

🔥11❤4🙏1

5 Nov 2026, 12:01 UTC≈1,230 views11 reactionsread 12 November 2026
Photo

AI в QA: свежие кейсы на Podlodka QA Crew Искусственный интеллект не только ускоряет работу, но и влияет на сам подход к тестированию. Часть рутины автоматизируется, но растут требования к способности инженера оценивать качество проверок, находить ошибки и сохранять контроль над результатом. С 16 по 20 ноября на конференции Podlodka QA Crew эксперты разберут, как меняется работа QA-инженеров и какие практики помога…

❤6❤‍🔥2👍2🌚1

4 Nov 2026, 13:37 UTC≈1,180 views5 reactionsread 11 November 2026

Всем доброго дня. 7 ноября к 13:00 MSK проведу урок : знакомство и адаптация к платформе, а также ответы на вопросы. 5 ноября старт Вступить можно до 15 ноября Следующий поток в феврале 2027 года. Скидки на участие: APISQL25 - 25% СКИДКА с 25 ОКТЯБРЯ ДО 6 НОЯБРЯ 2026г. APISQL20 - 20% СКИДКА С 7 НОЯБРЯ ДО 10 НОЯБРЯ 2026г. APISQL15 - 15% СКИДКА ДО 15 НОЯБРЯ 2026г. Условия и сроки проверки заданий: Тариф 1: без про…

❤‍🔥2👍2🔥1

4 Nov 2026, 13:37 UTC≈1,010 views4 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Forwarded from @info_course_protestinginfoPhoto

Я использую ресурс, чтобы дать возможности людям научиться тестировать бэкенд, предупредить, что их ожидает на проекте с интеграциями. Дать навыки бэкенда, если есть только фронт. Или те, кто сейчас в поиске своей первой работы. Я иду навстречу и ожидаю предложений. Моя задача: дать навыки и знания. Заранее знакомлю со структурой, для тех кто планирует купить курс. ✊🏻Сперва вы устанавливаете все инструменты; 🤝Буд…

🔥2❤‍🔥1🙏1

1 Nov 2026, 06:19 UTC≈1,380 views20 reactionsread 11 November 2026

Всем привет 👋 хочу написать отзыв про ментора @Nadin_QA Пришел я к Наде с опытом более 9 лет в сфере тестирования . Но с моим опытом я много месяцев не мог найти работу . Приходил на собеседования и не получал офферов, хотя фидбеки были хорошие. Во время консультаций , был переформулирован мой опыт, так же были сделаны акценты , что надо улучшить и доработать в самопрезентации и как результат оффер в течение месяца…

👍8🔥7❤‍🔥5

1 Nov 2026, 06:18 UTC≈1,300 views4 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Photo

Всем привет, в этом месяце решила не брать новых менти, а на курс по тестированию бэкенда набираю до 5 человек. Замечательный отзыв еще от ученицы, Татьяны💙 Хочу сказать огромное спасибо Наде за такой крутой и интереснейший курс! Курс грамотно выстроен — состоит из множества практических задач, которые дополняют друг друга и усложняются. Полное ощущение погружения в реальный проект, где шаг за шагом прокачиваешь пр…

❤‍🔥2👍1🙏1

29 Oct 2026, 18:00 UTC≈1,300 views9 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Video

Основные определения 👇 REST (Representational State Transfer) - это архитектурный стиль для построения распределённых систем REST API - архитектурный стиль проектирования программных интерфейсов RESTful API - это термин, который использует строгое следование принципам REST 1️ Клиент-Сервер (Client-Server) Полное разделение интересов. Клиент → UI/UX 🖥️ Сервер → Данные и логика Зачем: Независимое развитие и масштабир…

❤6✍2❤‍🔥1

Showing the 12 most recent of 53 posts we hold for @protestinginfo. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts edited after publishing

@protestinginfo edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
2 September 2026
Most recent edit
2 September 2026

Polls

The 6 most recent of 17 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

25 Oct 2026, 08:24 UTCAnonymous Poll275 voters

Статистика: Сколько верно ответили?

  1. 01%
  2. 11%
  3. 27%
  4. 319%
  5. 438%
  6. 530%
  7. Позже отвечу, пока учусь1%
  8. Воздержусь, посмотрю ответы3%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

25 Oct 2026, 08:23 UTCAnonymous Quiz372 voters

API использует пагинацию через limit=20&offset=40. Что означает такая комбинация?

  1. Вернуть 40 записей, начиная с двадцатой16%
  2. Пропустить 40 записей и вернуть следующие 2052%
  3. Вернуть записи с идентификаторами от 40 до 6018%
  4. Пропустить 20 записей и вернуть следующие 4015%

Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

25 Oct 2026, 08:23 UTCAnonymous Quiz377 voters

Может ли JSON содержать объект внутри массива и массив внутри объекта?

  1. Только объект внутри массива8%
  2. Только массив внутри объекта7%
  3. Да, оба варианта допустимы81%
  4. Нет, JSON допускает только один уровень вложенности4%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

25 Oct 2026, 08:23 UTCAnonymous Quiz389 voters

Может ли POST использоваться для получения данных без создания новой сущности?

  1. Нет, POST всегда обязан создавать новую запись11%
  2. Да, например для поиска со сложным фильтром или выполнения операции, передавая условия в теле запрос64%
  3. Нет, получение данных возможно только через GET8%
  4. Да, но только если тело запроса пустое18%

Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

25 Oct 2026, 08:23 UTCAnonymous Quiz382 voters

Какие из перечисленных протоколов относятся к сетевым протоколам, а не к форматам данных или стилям API?

  1. HTTP, TCP, DNS, FTP83%
  2. HTTP, REST, JSON, FTP3%
  3. TCP, GraphQL, XML, DNS9%
  4. HTTPS, SOAP, JSON, UDP5%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

25 Oct 2026, 08:23 UTCAnonymous Quiz366 voters

Какие типы данных поддерживает JSON?

  1. Строка, число, объект, массив, boolean, null77%
  2. Строка, число, объект, массив, дата, undefined6%
  3. Строка, число, объект, массив, функция, boolean10%
  4. Строка, число, объект, массив, binary, null7%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 53 most recent posts we hold, published 31 July 2026 to 11 November 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

QA Sklad - Склад тестировщика
@qa_sklad · 23,087
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 18 September 2026
Artsiom Rusau QA Life - Тестировщик с нуля
@qachanell · 30,141
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 7 September 2026
Тестировщик от бога
@godoftesting · 29,147
Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 8 September 2026
Серьезный тестировщик 🐞
@serious_tester · 29,726
Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 7 September 2026
Работа для тестировщиков. QA
@qajoboffer · 20,811
Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 27 September 2026
Job for QA
@forallqa · 22,934
Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 20 September 2026
IT Events 📆 АйТи События
@itevents · 17,272
Telegram ranks this channel #43 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 30 September 2026
IT - стажировки и обучение
@it_interns · 31,662
Telegram ranks this channel #50 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 6 September 2026

This channel appears in 8 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“📚 ProTestingInfo 🔷 Канал по тестированию 📚” (@protestinginfo), 14,848 subscribers as measured 10 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/protestinginfo.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.