Git для профессионального программиста Автор: Чакон С. Год издания: 2024 Скачать книгу

Channel
🧑💻 Уютное сообщество тестировщиков
@cozyqa
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Advertising · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
7,867subscribers
-87 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001234861171 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @cozyqa |
| Description | Уютное сообщество тестировщиков - это экосистема для QA. Чат, канал-работы, новости, фичи. Реклама: @anothertechrock |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 8 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 25 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 8 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/cozyqa |
Topic
Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 79% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 8 Nov 2026, 11:51 | 7,867 | -3 |
| 5 Nov 2026, 13:50 | 7,870 | -8 |
| 2 Nov 2026, 12:55 | 7,878 | -6 |
| 30 Oct 2026, 13:20 | 7,884 | -14 |
| 27 Oct 2026, 07:38 | 7,898 | -7 |
| 24 Oct 2026, 13:46 | 7,905 | -10 |
| 18 Oct 2026, 14:09 | 7,915 | -2 |
| 15 Oct 2026, 14:36 | 7,917 | -6 |
| 12 Oct 2026, 19:06 | 7,923 | -14 |
| 6 Oct 2026, 16:21 | 7,937 | -10 |
| 29 Sept 2026, 17:00 | 7,947 | +2 |
| 19 Sept 2026, 02:57 | 7,945 | -8 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 19:59 | 7,953 | +4 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 06:40 | 7,949 | +16 |
| 6 Sept 2026, 07:42 | 7,933 | -3 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 20:27 | 7,936 | -1 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 16:05 | 7,937 | +23 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 06:03 | 7,914 | -5 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 15:54 | 7,919 | -3 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 20:38 | 7,922 | first reading |
Engagement
36 posts held, back to 13 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 37 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 9.72%
- avg views ÷ 7,867 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 764
- 5 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 0.345%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 5
- of 36 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 3 of 5 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 10 November 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 36 (13 May 2026 – 10 November 2026) |
| Views total | 3,822 |
| Reactions total | 9 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 12 Nov 2026, 02:16 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- 305
- Videos
- 42
- Links
- 501
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
- Video runtime
- 46s
- Average length
- 46s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
72 reactions across 22 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 34.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 25 | 34.7% | |
| 👍 | 15 | 20.8% | |
| 🔥 | 10 | 13.9% | |
| 👎 | 7 | 9.72% | |
| 💩 | 7 | 9.72% | |
| 🥰 | 5 | 6.94% | |
| 👌 | 2 | 2.78% | |
| ⚡ | 1 | 1.39% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 25 of the 36 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 79 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 36 most recent posts we hold, published 13 May 2026 to 10 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Advertising
- Ad load
- 2.78%
- 1 of 36 posts carry an ad marker
- Regulatory tokens
- 1
- posts carrying an erid · 1 distinct token
- Median views · ads
- 1,080
- over 1 measured post
- Median views · rest
- 1,100
- over 35 measured posts
An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.
This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor. A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.
Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.
| erid | Posts | First seen | Last seen |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2W5zFJfmVAh | 1 | 10 August 2026 | 10 August 2026 |
A token repeated across several posts is one advertising contract placed more than once, which is what the identifier is for. The strings are reproduced exactly as they appeared in the post or in its click-through URL and are not validated against any registry — we record the marker a channel published, and whether it resolves to a real contract is a question for the register that issued it.
Measured over the 36 most recent posts we hold, published 13 May 2026 to 10 November 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 5 posts held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
💡 Полезные статьи о REST API ✨ 15 вопросов и ответов на собеседовании по REST API. Отличный чек-лист, если готовитесь к собеседованию и хотите освежить знания по HTTP, методам запросов и REST-концепциям. ✨ Что такое REST? Подробная статья для тех, кто хочет разобраться в самой сути. ✨ Как использовать curl для тестирования REST API. Статья, обучающая основам взаимодействия с REST API с помощью curl. ✨ REST и REST…
❤1
❓ Зачем тестировать приложение в разных браузерах? Казалось бы, интернет работает по единым стандартам консорциума W3C, а большинство популярных браузеров (Chrome, Edge, Opera, Brave) и вовсе написаны на одном движке — Chromium. Зачем тогда тратить время на кроссбраузерное тестирование? Дело в том, что они работают одинаково только на первый взгляд. Вот три главные причины, почему у пользователя могут поплыть верс…
Тестирование веб-API Автор: Винтерингем Марк Год издания: 2024 Скачать книгу
🟢 Пирамида тестирования - классика и новости 1️⃣ Пирамида тестирования 2.0. Как ИИ трансформирует тестирование. Традиционная пирамида тестирования годами служила QA командам, но с приходом ИИ в разработку ПО пришло время переосмыслить подход к тестированию. Эта эволюция затрагивает все аспекты тестирования: от создания тестов до их выполнения и поддержки. 2️⃣ Пирамида тестирования и ее польза для Agile-команд. В ст…
🥰5❤2👍1
⭐️ Тестовые сценарии для поля ввода номера телефона Задание «Протестировать поле ввода телефона» — классика на собеседованиях. Чтобы ответ звучал профессионально, делите тест-кейсы по техникам тест-дизайна и слоям системы (UI, валидация, интеграция). 1️⃣ Позитивные сценарии (Happy Path) • Минимальная и максимальная длина номера — проверка валидных значений на границах допустимого диапазона (Boundary Value Analysi…
❤2
SQL. Курс молодого бойца Автор: Ольга Назина Год издания: 2026 Скачать книгу
🔥6👌2
🤓 Материалы по Git, которые могут быть полезны тестировщику 1️⃣ 20 базовых команд Git. Как новичкам, так и опытным пользователям будет полезно еще раз повторить базовые повседневные команды. 2️⃣ Команды Git для QA автоматизации. В этой статье рассмотрены основные команды Git, которые должен знать каждый QA-инженер по автоматизации. Поверьте, эти команды значительно упростят ваш рабочий процесс. 3️⃣ Git для QA Engi…
❤3
❓ Что такое кластеризация дефектов? Кластеризация дефектов (Defect Clustering) — это один из фундаментальных принципов тестирования, который опирается на закон Парето. В контексте QA он звучит так: Около 80% всех обнаруженных багов сосредоточены всего в 20% модулей приложения. Проще говоря, дефекты редко распределяются по системе равномерно: обычно они «скучиваются» в определенных местах. ✅ Почему баги собираются…
👍3
Основы юзабилити-тестирования Автор: Кэрол М. Барум Год издания: 2021 Скачать книгу
🔥 Техники тест-дизайна 📥 Основные техники тест-дизайна. Статья знакомит с ключевыми методами сокращения тестовых сценариев без потери качества покрытия. Автор разбирает такие подходы, как граничные значения, классы эквивалентности, таблицы решений и переходы состояний. 📥 Исследовательское тестирование. В статье разбираются ключевые этапы и лучшие практики этого подхода, полезные инструменты, а также качества, необх…
❤1
❓ В чем особенность протокола TCP? TCP (Transmission Control Protocol) — это протокол транспортного уровня, главная задача которого — гарантировать, что данные дойдут до получателя в полном объеме и в правильном порядке. В отличие от легковесного UDP, TCP берет на себя полный контроль над доставкой. ✅ Основные механизмы работы TCP: 1️⃣ Установление соединения (Three-Way Handshake) Прежде чем отправить первый ба…
❤3
Showing the 12 most recent of 36 posts we hold for @cozyqa. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 6 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
@jobforqa · 15,3782 postsPython работа
@pythonrabota · 13,3182 postsРабота для тестировщика.
@qajobsoffers · 10,4602 postsРабота для тестировщиков. QA
@qajoboffer · 20,8111 postQARocks. Тестировщик Рулит 🐞
@qarocks · 17,8461 postТесты для тестировщика.
@qatests · 1,4091 post
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
@progsbook · 5,0722 postsЧто по книжкам?
@skachac · 6,6882 posts阿里云账号|腾讯云账号|阿里云代充|腾讯云代充|阿里云服务器
@alifuwuqi · 1,6501 postАрхив книг
@bookdownlld · 2,3501 postАрхив книг
@cocosnull · 6,7601 postJava Вакансии
@javaoffers · 2,5591 postQA Вакансии. Работа для тестировщиков. QaRocks
@jobforqa · 15,3781 postВакансии для тестировщиков.
@jobfortester · 6,3771 postВакансии Golang
@jobgolang · 3,9251 postКниги.Программирование.Тестирование.IT.Архив.
@knigapad · 5,9881 postКниги по программированию
@knigiet · 4,3551 postPM Вакансии
@projectmanagersjob · 8571 postPython работа
@pythonrabota · 13,3181 postРабота для тестировщиков. QA
@qajoboffer · 20,8111 postC# вакансии
@rabotacschap · 3,2851 postQA Вакансия
@rabotadlaqa · 17,0371 postPHP вакансии
@rabotaphp · 2,5581 postКниги это свет.📚
@readandget · 7,6221 postIT Релокация
@relocatesme · 7,0571 postIT Резюме
@resumeinit · 2,0801 postSaveLink
@savelink_testing · 691 postTalanto. Поиск работы в IT
@talantojob · 1,7471 post
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@qajoboffer · 20,811
Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 27 September 2026
@qa_sklad · 23,087
Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 18 September 2026
@serious_tester · 29,726
Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 7 September 2026
@godoftesting · 29,147
Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 8 September 2026
@qachanell · 30,141
Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 7 September 2026
@itevents · 17,272
Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 30 September 2026
@forallqa · 22,934
Telegram ranks this channel #35 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 20 September 2026
This channel appears in 7 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“🧑💻 Уютное сообщество тестировщиков” (@cozyqa), 7,867 subscribers as measured 8 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/cozyqa.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.