Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for QA Family by Alexey

Channel

QA Family by Alexey

@dev_qa

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

1,632subscribers

-2 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001665546739
TypeChannel
Username@dev_qa
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live27 September 2026
Measurements held11
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 27 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/dev_qa

Topic

Technology — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 17 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 57% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

1,6261,6341,6306 August 2026 — 1,634 subscribers7 August 2026 — 1,633 subscribers10 August 2026 — 1,630 subscribers13 August 2026 — 1,628 subscribers16 August 2026 — 1,629 subscribers23 August 2026 — 1,630 subscribers26 August 2026 — 1,628 subscribers1 September 2026 — 1,626 subscribers13 September 2026 — 1,627 subscribers17 September 2026 — 1,628 subscribers27 September 2026 — 1,632 subscribers1,6326 August 202627 September 2026
11 measurements spanning 51 days, net -2. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,625–1,635 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
27 Sept 2026, 06:011,632+4
17 Sept 2026, 14:161,628+1
13 Sept 2026, 20:391,627+1
1 Sept 2026, 07:141,626-2
26 Aug 2026, 09:241,628-2
23 Aug 2026, 06:431,630+1
16 Aug 2026, 21:171,629+1
13 Aug 2026, 02:261,628-2
10 Aug 2026, 10:131,630-3
7 Aug 2026, 10:481,633-1
6 Aug 2026, 20:461,634first reading

Engagement

21 posts held, back to 10 February 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 21 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
11s
Average length
11s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

351 reactions across 20 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 48.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥17148.7%
👍7120.2%
❤5315.1%
😁349.69%
custom 5343903321633596987185.13%
🤯41.14%

Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it is Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 21 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 351 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 21 most recent posts we hold, published 10 February 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
11
across the posts below
Posts paid on
5
of 21 we hold a reading for · 24%
Most on one post
6
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @dev_qa. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 21 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 10 February 2026 to 7 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

7 Aug 2026, 06:44 UTC239 views17 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Posted without readable text

🔥14👍2custom 53439033216335969871

27 Jul 2026, 06:41 UTC575 views29 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

За последние пару месяцев сделал кучу интересных инженерных штук для тестирования - и две из них вполне тянут на доклад 😁 Например, UI-обвязку над adb/simctl. Не думал, что буду делать что-то для мобилок 😂, но инструменты там супер-неудобные, вот и пришлось немного закрыть свою боль Скринчик тулзы - для привлечения внимания

🔥16❤8👍4😁1

2 Jun 2026, 07:01 UTC≈1,170 views19 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Самые лучшие МРы!

😁13👍6

12 May 2026, 06:55 UTC≈1,450 views26 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Наконец-то спустя год добрался потыкать n8n. Долго думал, что полезного сделать. В итоге по источникам @vzhyx_exp сделал парсинг и сбор дайджеста. А да, еще умные заметки сделал подробнее тут. Вот обзор событий за последнюю неделю. Если вам это интересно, буду продолжать публиковать такие дайджесты еженедельно. 🦖🦖🦖 Дайджест ➖ What's new in DevTools (Chrome 148) — https://developer.chrome.com/blog/new-in-devtools-1…

🔥16👍5custom 53439033216335969875

7 May 2026, 08:31 UTC≈1,520 views23 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Открыли записи с прошлого гейзенбага И вот мой топ докладов: 🟣Собеседование QA под нейросетью: когда ИИ говорит «Да» 🟣Взлом AI-агентов: прикладная инструкция к уязвимостям LLM и тулов 🟣Следуй за белым кроликом 🟣Браузерные инструменты: пишем свое расширение 🟣Миграция тестов в Linux Посмотреть все доклады: https://youtube.com/playlist?list=PLsVTVVvrKX9u6qzDRS5dfGg0kIjQm-Oym

🔥10❤6👍5custom 53439033216335969872

4 May 2026, 07:35 UTC≈1,590 views23 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Всем привет! Неделю назад я был на конференции Гейзенбаг, где выступила моя хорошая знакомая Юлия Атлыгина с докладом «Инструменты тестировщика 2026». У нее есть крутой доклад, где она рассказывала об инструментах, о которых она говорила 8 лет назад. Тогда я задумался, что тоже хочу выступить. В новой версии было много знакомых и новых для меня инструментов. Но самое крутое — она собрала классную страничку-таблицу,…

🔥18❤4custom 53439033216335969871

24 Apr 2026, 05:15 UTC≈1,280 views35 reactions2 Starsread 7 August 2026

Всем привет! Мой последний доклад на Гейзенбаге был про одну из моих любимых тем — автоматизацию рутинных действий в браузере и подготовку тестовых данных через собственное расширение. Я вышел с доклада со смешанными чувствами: будто недоготовился и не сказал того, что хотел. Но за 3 года спикерской карьеры я понял одно: неважно, сколько человек тебя слушало, неважно, что кому-то не понравилось — если доклад будет…

👍17🔥11❤7

13 Apr 2026, 08:22 UTC≈1,290 views14 reactions1 Starread 7 August 2026

https://github.com/microsoft/markitdown Либа которая конвертирует большую часть документов в markdown, удобно для скармливание в LLM

🔥8👍4❤2

3 Apr 2026, 07:17 UTC≈1,450 views22 reactions1 Starread 7 August 2026
Photo

Всем привет, пообщались на тему личного бренда Главный вывод простой: если ты не работаешь над своим брендом — его место займёт кто-то другой. Пока ты молчишь, другой делает. Пока ты ждёшь, другой выигрывает у вас конкуренция на рынке труда.​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​ Спикеры: - https://t.me/bettercalllory - https://t.me/vsemnetworking https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X6cjGXG-zLc

🔥10👍7❤3custom 53439033216335969872

17 Mar 2026, 16:05 UTC≈1,320 views9 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @moscowqa

Подключайтесь: 🇷🇺 https://www.twitch.tv/moscowqa https://www.youtube.com/live/gmrO3l7F3lY Если хотите поделиться мнением, присоединяйтесь: https://riverside.com/studio/js-plays-studio?t=7a59a05db3cd58c11c44

👍6🔥3

10 Mar 2026, 08:06 UTC≈1,600 views35 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

В dev tools chrome можно замедлять определенную ручку, а не все запросы как раньше https://developer.chrome.com/blog/throttle-individual-network-requests?hl=en

🔥31❤2😁2

5 Mar 2026, 06:55 UTC≈1,820 views16 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Если кто - то начинает учить python, очень удобный учебник, рекомендую https://pylot.me/

❤13👍1🔥1custom 53439033216335969871

Showing the 12 most recent of 21 posts we hold for @dev_qa. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

15 Feb 2026, 11:11 UTCAnonymous Poll120 voters

Должны ли боты делать PR самостоятельно?

  1. да10%
  2. не37%
  3. Если это разрешает политика работы ИИ в проекте53%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 21 most recent posts we hold, published 10 February 2026 to 7 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Серьезный тестировщик 🐞
@serious_tester · 30,126
Telegram ranks this channel #43 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 7 September 2026
Тестировщик от бога
@godoftesting · 29,517
Telegram ranks this channel #58 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 8 September 2026
QA Sklad - Склад тестировщика
@qa_sklad · 23,330
Telegram ranks this channel #62 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 18 September 2026
Artsiom Rusau QA Life - Тестировщик с нуля
@qachanell · 30,259
Telegram ranks this channel #75 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 7 September 2026
Job for QA
@forallqa · 22,530
Telegram ranks this channel #82 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 20 September 2026

This channel appears in 5 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 27 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“QA Family by Alexey” (@dev_qa), 1,632 subscribers as measured 27 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/dev_qa.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.