Channel
@rkn_tg
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cross-platform identity · Referenced elsewhere · Cite this entry
65,012subscribers
-316 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001230375794 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @rkn_tg |
| Created | 13 October 2020 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 10 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 14 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/rkn_tg |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 14 Aug 2026, 13:28 | 65,012 | -55 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 01:03 | 65,067 | -39 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 02:15 | 65,106 | -30 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 23:52 | 65,136 | -51 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 22:23 | 65,187 | -35 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 23:51 | 65,222 | -40 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 22:51 | 65,262 | -40 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 20:52 | 65,302 | -26 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 01:36 | 65,328 | no change |
| 5 Aug 2026, 22:01 | 65,328 | first reading |
10 posts held, back to 3 March 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 20 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 10 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 April 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
26,375 reactions across 10 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 70.1% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👏 | 18,498 | 70.1% | |
| 🤩 | 3,631 | 13.8% | |
| ❤ | 2,087 | 7.91% | |
| 🔥 | 961 | 3.64% | |
| 👍 | 424 | 1.61% | |
| 👌 | 319 | 1.21% | |
| ⚡ | 286 | 1.08% | |
| 💯 | 169 | 0.641% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 10 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 26,375reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 10 most recent posts we hold, published 3 March 2026 to 7 April 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🌐 Рунету 32 года! И это отличный повод провести ревизию цифровых привычек. Каждый день мы делаем в Сети десятки простых действий: заказываем еду, покупаем билеты, смотрим фильмы и читаем новости. И каждое из этих действий требует особого внимания! 📎 В карточках – небольшие напоминания о безопасности в Рунете. 💬 Листайте и делитесь с близкими! Подписывайтесь на Роскомнадзор в MAX
👏18,100🤩2,600🔥379❤201👍188
🖥 В марте 2026 года специалисты Центра мониторинга и управления сетью связи общего пользования (#ЦМУ_ССОП): 🛡 Заблокировали 10 473 фишинговых ресурса и 536 сайтов, на которых распространялось вредоносное программное обеспечение. 🛡 Отразили 2 394 DDoS-атаки в отношении систем защищаемых субъектов государственного управления и операторов связи. 🔹 Максимальная мощность DDoS-атаки за указанный период достигла 767,28 Г…
🤩651👍130❤120👌113💯77
👏 Каждый иск – победа! По итогам 2025 года суды удовлетворили 100% исков, поданных юристами Центра правовой помощи гражданам в цифровой среде* 🤩 Еще немного впечатляющих цифр 👇 ➡️ 11 тыс. заявителей обратились в Центр. На 44% больше, чем в прошлом году. ➡️ Около 7,5 тыс. претензий, жалоб, требований и других документов подготовили юристы от имени граждан. В полтора раза больше, чем в 2024 году. 💡 Напоминаем, что…
🔥167❤95⚡60👏47👌31
Я помню чудное мгновенье: Передо мной явилась ты, Как мимолетное виденье, Как гений чистой красоты. А.С.Пушкин. К*** («Я помню чудное мгновенье…») Сразу вспомнили автора и название стихотворения?🔎 Тогда задача сложнее! Проверим, вспомните ли вы другие произведения русской поэзии и их авторов. Мы не просто так заговорили о стихотворениях, ведь сегодня День поэзии! 🤩 Поэтому давайте вспомним русскую классику вмест…
🔥210❤126⚡63👏62🤩51
🎉 Авторы каналов в MAX смогут получить маркировку А+ Владельцы каналов в национальном мессенджере MAX, чья аудитория превышает 10 тыс. подписчиков, теперь могут верифицировать свой канал с помощью специальной отметки А+. Как получить отметку А+ в MAX? 1️⃣ Подайте заявку на регистрацию канала в Перечне Роскомнадзора через портал Госуслуг. После этого вашему заявлению будет присвоен десятизначный номер – он понадоб…
❤173👌114🤩85🔥48👍31
Photo, posted without a caption
❤370👏146🤩92👌61⚡54
Video, posted without a caption
❤548🔥130🤩98👍54💯53
⚡️⚡️⚡️⚡️⚡️⚡️⚡️⚡️ ✈️ Получить разрешение на ввоз в Россию радиоэлектронных средств (РЭС)* и высокочастотных устройств (ВЧУ)* можно максимально просто и удобно! Подтверждает это сертификат от Аналитического центра при Правительстве Российской Федерации 🙂 Федеральная лаборатория оценивала: ➡️ Насколько услуга соответствует потребностям конкретной целевой аудитории ➡️ Совпадают ли ожидания клиента с реальным восприя…
❤134👏38⚡33🤩14💯12
🖥 В феврале 2026 года специалисты Центра мониторинга и управления сетью связи общего пользования (#ЦМУ_ССОП): 🛡 Заблокировали 14 726 фишинговых ресурсов и 457 сайтов, на которых распространялось вредоносное программное обеспечение. 🛡 Отразили 2 218 DDoS-атак в отношении систем защищаемых субъектов государственного управления и операторов связи. 🔹 Максимальная мощность DDoS-атаки за указанный период достигла 1,2 Тб…
❤164👏90⚡45🤩40💯27
💕💕💕⭐️ 💕💕💕💖💕💕💕💕 Помните это чувство? За окном шумит дождь или метет снег, вы забираетесь с ногами на диван, укутываетесь в теплый плед, включаете торшер и открываете потрепанную книгу… 🤩 А когда вы в последний раз перечитывали русскую классику? Мечтали о балах с Татьяной Лариной, бродили по Петербургу с Раскольниковым и смеялись над рассказами А.П.Чехова🤩 Предлагаем поставить видео на паузу и прочитать любое произ…
❤156⚡31🔥27👍21👏15
Showing the 10 most recent of 10 posts we hold for @rkn_tg. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 15,028 of 1,340,412entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 48 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A Wikidata item names this Telegram handle as belonging to the entity it describes. This is Wikidata’s claim, not a verification made by this register — nobody here confirmed that the account is genuinely operated by the entity named. Wikidata content is CC0; every fact below is dated to when it was read from Wikidata, not to when the association was first made there.
| Label | Roskomnadzor |
|---|---|
| Description | Russian government agency |
| X / Twitter | @roscomnadzor |
| Official site | https://eng.rkn.gov.ru/ |
This handle named by sources this register does not control and did not measure — each shown exactly as found, attributed by name, dated to when it was read.
Wikipedia
3 Wikipedia articles name this handle in its article text, found by searching for a t.me link inside the article source. A citation is a notability signal, not a verification: nobody here confirmed the cited post is genuine or still says what the article quotes. Article text is CC BY-SA 4.0, Wikipedia contributors; snippets below are short excerpts.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“РоскомнадZор” (@rkn_tg), 65,012 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/rkn_tg.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.