Channel
@davydovin
On this record: Topic · Observations · Channels linked by matching posts · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · View velocity · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Telegram's recommendations · Domains linked from posts · Cite this entry
1,798,799subscribers
-138,513 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among the largest entries.
| Telegram ID | -1001007375479 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @davydovin |
| Description | Канал экспертной сети davydov.in. Подпишитесь на наши каналы: @davydov_culture, @davydovineconomics, @davydovopinion. |
| Created | 11 December 2015 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 10 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 64 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 10 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/davydovin |
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 8 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 44% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.
Posts published here appear in near-verbatim form on 1 other registered channel. This entry also forms a group of 2 channels linked by matching posts. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.
| Posted first | Then | Overlap | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| @davydovskazki/4133 Mar 2026, 08:00 UTC | @davydovin/6855 · this entry7 Mar 2026, 08:00 UTC | 1.00 | 4 days |
| @davydovskazki/41714 Apr 2026, 08:00 UTC | @davydovin/6892 · this entry18 Apr 2026, 08:00 UTC | 1.00 | 4 days |
| @davydovskazki/42226 May 2026, 08:01 UTC | @davydovin/6924 · this entry30 May 2026, 08:01 UTC | 1.00 | 4 days |
| @davydovskazki/4232 Jun 2026, 09:31 UTC | @davydovin/6929 · this entry6 Jun 2026, 08:00 UTC | 1.00 | 4 days |
| @davydovskazki/42630 Jun 2026, 08:01 UTC | @davydovin/6953 · this entry4 Jul 2026, 08:02 UTC | 1.00 | 4 days |
| @davydovskazki/4277 Jul 2026, 08:00 UTC | @davydovin/6959 · this entry11 Jul 2026, 08:00 UTC | 1.00 | 4 days |
| Channel | Matching posts | Text overlap | Typical gap | Published first |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| @davydovskazki | 19 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed) | 1.00 | 4 days | @davydovskazki (19–0) |
Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.
What this cannot establish
MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.
Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. None of the 16 matches recorded here fall after that date, so for this entry we cannot say whether any of them carried a credit. The duplication is measured; the absence of attribution is not.
“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 6,073 comparable posts for this entry, running 17 September 2016 to 6 August 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.
The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.
Of the group of 2 channels, the one whose matching posts we hold earliest is @davydovskazki. That is a statement about our reading window, not a claim of authorship.
Recorded under the key clone_copy, last confirmed 7 August 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.
This channel is in a group of 2 registered channels linked by matching posts. Links are found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register.
Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown in this list. “First” could only mean first in our own crawl, which depends on how deep we happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. Our one hand-check read 45 of the highest-confidence flagged pairs against the live Telegram pages. In 18 of them the live page showed a “Forwarded from” credit that our database had no record of, so reading that pair as an unattributed copy was wrong; the check did not measure who published first. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Near-verbatim matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 10 Nov 2026, 13:06 | 1,798,799 | +16,517 |
| 8 Nov 2026, 23:39 | 1,782,282 | -14,425 |
| 7 Nov 2026, 12:52 | 1,796,707 | -6,715 |
| 6 Nov 2026, 12:46 | 1,803,422 | +3,149 |
| 5 Nov 2026, 11:59 | 1,800,273 | +3,829 |
| 4 Nov 2026, 15:09 | 1,796,444 | +29,960 |
| 3 Nov 2026, 14:07 | 1,766,484 | +1,873 |
| 2 Nov 2026, 14:19 | 1,764,611 | -6,210 |
| 1 Nov 2026, 10:55 | 1,770,821 | +25,379 |
| 31 Oct 2026, 13:46 | 1,745,442 | +6,242 |
| 30 Oct 2026, 14:28 | 1,739,200 | -1,719 |
| 29 Oct 2026, 16:31 | 1,740,919 | -29,796 |
| 28 Oct 2026, 16:08 | 1,770,715 | +21,844 |
| 27 Oct 2026, 14:57 | 1,748,871 | +45,330 |
| 26 Oct 2026, 13:07 | 1,703,541 | -8,112 |
| 25 Oct 2026, 09:35 | 1,711,653 | -1,277 |
| 24 Oct 2026, 12:40 | 1,712,930 | -3,222 |
| 23 Oct 2026, 10:30 | 1,716,152 | -13,526 |
| 22 Oct 2026, 08:48 | 1,729,678 | -1,199 |
| 21 Oct 2026, 04:30 | 1,730,877 | first reading |
6,883 posts held, back to 11 December 2015 — the reader has reached the start of this channel’s public history, so this is the full archive Telegram still exposes. Read across 3,943 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 9 November 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 6,883 (11 December 2015 – 9 November 2026) |
| Views total | 4,816,400 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 11 Nov 2026, 01:28 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 11 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
How fast this channel’s own posts pick up views, from re-reading them repeatedly in the hours and days after they were published rather than the single reading most entries on this register get. Coverage is early and only a small minority of channels hold it at all — a gap in this section means the post has not been re-read again yet, not that nothing happened.
Computed from 16 of this channel’s own posts over the last 30 days: across 16 of this channel’s own posts with a clear reading, a typical one reaches half of its last-observed view count within 20 hours of being posted; a typical post has already reached 1.95% of its 24-hour view count within the first hour, and 70.8% within the first six; the median 24-hour reach across those posts is 71,150 views — 3.96% of this channel’s own subscriber count (90th percentile 141,000).
| Post | Readings | Latest reading | Curve | 24h reach | Half of last-observed views by |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| /70419 Nov 2026, 10:39 UTC | 2851 minutes – 39 hours old | 45,400 views ~no reaction reading | 60 minutes: 6,160 interp. → 3.0 hours: 13,700 → 6.0 hours: 16,300 → 12 hours: 39,000 → 24 hours: 45,200views have flattened out | 45,200measured | 7.1 hours |
| /70408 Nov 2026, 15:50 UTC | 3025 minutes – 2 days old | 110,000 views ~no reaction reading | 60 minutes: 37,636 interp. → 3.0 hours: 64,900 → 6.0 hours: 83,500 → 12 hours: 109,000 → 24 hours: 109,000 → 2 days: 110,000views have flattened out | 109,000measured | 1.9 hours |
| /70392 Nov 2026, 10:00 UTC | 689 minutes – 7 days old | 109,000 views ~no reaction reading | 60 minutes: 195 interp. → 3.0 hours: 349 interp. → 6.0 hours: 22,228 interp. → 12 hours: 42,900 → 24 hours: 43,000 → 2 days: 74,000 → 7 days: 109,000views have flattened out | 43,000measured | 35 hours |
| /70382 Nov 2026, 09:06 UTC | 658 minutes – 7 days old | 95,500 views ~no reaction reading | 60 minutes: 349 interp. → 3.0 hours: 42,700 interp. → 6.0 hours: 42,800 → 12 hours: 43,000 → 24 hours: 43,100 → 2 days: 59,600 → 7 days: 95,500still climbing at last reading | 43,100measured | 47 hours |
| /70371 Nov 2026, 15:50 UTC | 5725 minutes – 7 days old | 167,000 views ~no reaction reading | 60 minutes: 912 interp. → 3.0 hours: 8,820 → 6.0 hours: 40,457 interp. → 12 hours: 114,000 → 24 hours: 115,000 → 2 days: 116,000 → 7 days: 167,000still climbing at last reading | 115,000measured | 8.8 hours |
| /703626 Oct 2026, 08:06 UTC | 6033 minutes – 7 days old | 211,000 views ~no reaction reading | 60 minutes: 344 interp. → 3.0 hours: 555 → 6.0 hours: 699 → 12 hours: 45,100 → 24 hours: 103,000 → 2 days: 129,000 → 7 days: 211,000views have flattened out | 103,000measured | 24 hours |
| /703525 Oct 2026, 15:50 UTC | 5865 minutes – 7 days old | 161,000 views ~no reaction reading | 3.0 hours: 45,000 → 6.0 hours: 45,100 interp. → 12 hours: 45,200 → 24 hours: 48,600 → 2 days: 99,100 → 7 days: 161,000still climbing at last reading | 48,600measured | 25 hours |
| /703424 Oct 2026, 08:07 UTC | 6763 minutes – 7 days old | 284,000 views ~no reaction reading | 3.0 hours: 14,400 → 6.0 hours: 78,200 → 12 hours: 147,000 → 24 hours: 147,000 → 2 days: 159,000 → 7 days: 284,000still climbing at last reading | 147,000measured | 12 hours |
Curve is every standard checkpoint we hold a reading for (+1h, +3h, +6h, +12h, +24h, +48h, +7d after posting) — measured where a real reading landed close enough to that age, interpolated where it did not but readings on both sides let one be worked out between them. Nothing is ever extrapolated past the last real reading. Latest reading is the newest view and reaction count we hold for the post, side by side, so a gap between how views and reactions moved is visible without following it into the Observations section above. 24h reach is that one checkpoint on its own, labelled the same way. Half of last-observed views is the age at which a post’s view count crossed half of the highest figure we have read for it so far — an upper bound when the very first reading was already past half (we cannot see the actual crossing), and biased low while the post is still climbing, since “half of final” is dividing by a number that has not finished growing yet. Both caveats are printed inline wherever they apply, never silently dropped.
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 16 posts held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
Экономика за 2–8 ноября 2026 года Очень плохие новости • Выдачи ипотеки в октябре упали на 49,2% к сентябрю в годовом выражении объем ипотеки упал на 36,2%. • 38% опрошенных РСПП компаний назвали главным ограничением снижение спроса, 36% — нехватку оборотных средств, еще 36% — неплатежи контрагентов. Сокращать издержки собираются 84% компаний, инвестпрограммы — 18%, производство или объем услуг — 15%. • Банк Росс…
Топ событий предстоящей недели 9-15 ноября 2026 года 9 ноября, понедельник Встреча Сергея Лаврова с главой МИД Перу Карлосом Эспой (Москва). XIV встреча секретарей советов безопасности стран СНГ (Москва). Совместное заседание Комитетов ГД по финансовому рынку, бюджету и налогам и экономической политике по рассмотрению «Основных направлений единой государственной денежно-кредитной политики на 2027 год и период 2028 и…
Топ событий октября 2026 года в региональной политике 1. Назначение Олега Кожемяко на должность вице-премьера правительства РФ - полпреда президента в ДФО и мэра Владивостока Константина Шестакова врио губернатора Приморского края. 2. Принятие изменений в устав Хабаровска, согласно которым главу города будут выбирать депутаты городской думы по представлению губернатора. 3. Ликвидация последствий срыва се…
Экономика за 26 октября - 1 ноября 2026 года Очень плохие новости · Ввод жилья за 9 месяцев сократился на 13,4%, в ИЖС – на 20,8%. · Инвестиции в гостиничную недвижимость за 9 месяцев рухнули на 61,1%. · Страховщики завершили III квартал с убытком 11,5 млрд руб. после полутора лет квартальной прибыли в диапазоне 100–150 млрд руб. · Сельское хозяйство в сентябре показало спад на 12,3% год к году. …
Топ событий предстоящей недели 2-8 ноября 2026 года 2 ноября, понедельник Визит Сергея Лаврова в Минск (по 3 ноября). XIV Внешнеэкономический форум-выставка партнерства и сотрудничества «Международный день торговли - 2026» (Москва, по 3 ноября). Международный форум «Российская креативная неделя - Евразия» (Уфа, по 4 ноября). Международная неделя «Народы России» (Москва, по 8 ноября). Пятый Всероссийский форум молоды…
Экономика за 19–25 октября 2026 года Очень плохие новости Центробанк повысил прогноз инфляции на конец 2026 года с 6–7% до 7,1–7,6% Прогноз роста ВВП на 2027 год понижен до 1-2%, прогноз средней ключевой ставки на 2027 год повышен с 10,5–12,5% до 12,5–13,5%. Минпромторг допустил сокращение производства и продаж «АвтоВАЗа» на 20–25% до конца года из-за приостановки программ льготного автокредитования. Прибыль «Северс…
Топ событий предстоящей недели 26 октября – 1 ноября 2026 года 26 октября, понедельник Заседание межправительственной комиссии по экономическому и научно-техническому сотрудничеству между Россией и Словакией (Москва). VI Российский экономический конгресс (Москва, по 30 октября). ХХ Международная научно-практическая конференция «Державинские чтения» (Москва, Тула, по 30 октября). XIV научно-практическая конференция «…
329. Петька сидит как-то, прислонившись спиной к штакетнику, и читает. Встречая незнакомое слово, идет к Василию Ивановичу – он там у ни вместо иваниваныча был. Приходит, а Василий Иванович сидит чай пьет, ну Петька не мешает, стоит тихонько. Василий Иванович сердито спрашивает – Чего тебе, Петька? – Да я вот книжку читаю, а там слово такое «легитимность», что это такое, а? Василий Иванович сощурился, откусил кусоче…
Всматриваясь в трупные пятна будущего, пожалуйста, не путайте базис с надстройкой. Не давайте неким очень умным запутать вас релевантностью объектно-субъектных отношений. Помните старину Маркса: базис определяет отношения, не наоборот, и тогда, если увидите рубку, то поймете – это надстройка.
Продолжая тему перекладывания диспропорций через их суверенизацию, стоит отметить, что сначала была попытка войти в штопор через ковид, но мир устоял, теперь волевое усилие пробует зайти с другой стороны, но страх лишь продлевает адаптацию к турбулентности (агонию). Остается вопрос: когда и если коллективное бессознательное включит (найдет в себе) инстинкт самосохранения и как к этому времени все будет выглядеть.
Злые языки говорят, что в причина всех революций и войн есть экономические диспропорции, а цель их – устранение или хотя бы качественное смягчение таковых. Нынешние диспропорции мировой экономики столь значимы, что надеяться можно почти только на сингулярность, ибо только алгоритму ИИ, лишенному рефлексии, под силу раздвинуть, а потом сомкнуть ряды бестолковых манипуляторов, на коленке изобретающих нарративы и пото…
Экономика за 12-18 октября ОЧЕНЬ ПЛОХИЕ НОВОСТИ Объем отгрузки нефтепродуктов из портов уменьшился в сентябре на 12% и оказался примерно вдвое ниже сентября 2025 года. В I полугодии число корпоративных банкротств выросло на 11%. Средний тариф страхования складской недвижимости в III квартале достиг 2% от стоимости имущества, увеличившись почти в 7 раз в сравнении с предыдущим кварталом. ПЛОХИЕ НОВОСТИ В октябрь…
Showing the 12 most recent of 6,883 posts we hold for @davydovin. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 42 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@davydovin named 19 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 8 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 14 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
2 domains this channel’s own posts have linked to, measured by scanning the post bodies themselves — not the channel’s description, which is the separate Declared links section below when this entry has one. Appearing here is not a claim about who runs the linked site or why the channel linked to it; an advertisement, a news citation and a malicious link all leave the same kind of row.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Давыдов.Индекс” (@davydovin), 1,798,799 subscribers as measured 10 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/davydovin.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.