محمد باقر قالیباف رئیس مجلس، ماه قبل: از قیمت فعلی بنزین لذت ببرید. با آنچه به نام محاصره گفته میشود، به زودی دلتان برای بنزین 4 تا 5 دلاری تنگ خواهد شد. ایشون فکر میکنن آمریکاییا ایران زندگی میکنند ؟! بنزین ۸۷ هزارتومان !! 🤦♂️🤦♂️
😱17

Channel
@radin_trade
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
58,940subscribers
-351 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001847320763 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @radin_trade |
| Description | اینجا هرچقدر که بتونیم؛ فرصت های موجود در بازار رو بهتون معرفی میکنیم تا سرمایهگذاری کنید. برای ارتباط با پشتیبانی رادین به آیدی زیر پیام بدهید: @radin_crypto |
| Created | Between 1 October 2022 and 31 August 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 9 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/radin_trade |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 17:44 | 58,940 | -32 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 14:21 | 58,972 | -47 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 15:46 | 59,019 | -68 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 16:03 | 59,087 | -52 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 15:20 | 59,139 | -69 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 14:18 | 59,208 | -74 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 17:10 | 59,282 | -9 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 13:30 | 59,291 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 13:24 | 59,291 | first reading |
29 posts held, back to 28 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 17 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 29 (28 July 2026 – 12 August 2026) |
| Views total | 262,541 |
| Reactions total | 2,385 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 12 Aug 2026, 19:26 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
2,385 reactions across 29 posts, in 20 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 56.6% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 1,349 | 56.6% | |
| 👍 | 338 | 14.2% | |
| ❤🔥 | 145 | 6.08% | |
| ⚡ | 97 | 4.07% | |
| 🤝 | 90 | 3.77% | |
| 🙏 | 56 | 2.35% | |
| 🔥 | 53 | 2.22% | |
| 😱 | 46 | 1.93% | |
| 🐳 | 37 | 1.55% | |
| 👾 | 34 | 1.43% | |
| 🏆 | 24 | 1.01% | |
| 😎 | 18 | 0.755% | |
| 🕊 | 17 | 0.713% | |
| ✍ | 16 | 0.671% | |
| 🎅 | 16 | 0.671% | |
| 👌 | 14 | 0.587% | |
| 🥰 | 14 | 0.587% | |
| 🤗 | 12 | 0.503% | |
| 👏 | 5 | 0.21% | |
| 🫡 | 4 | 0.168% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 29 of the 29 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2,385reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 29 most recent posts we hold, published 28 July 2026 to 12 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @radin_trade. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 29 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 28 July 2026 to 12 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
محمد باقر قالیباف رئیس مجلس، ماه قبل: از قیمت فعلی بنزین لذت ببرید. با آنچه به نام محاصره گفته میشود، به زودی دلتان برای بنزین 4 تا 5 دلاری تنگ خواهد شد. ایشون فکر میکنن آمریکاییا ایران زندگی میکنند ؟! بنزین ۸۷ هزارتومان !! 🤦♂️🤦♂️
😱17
کالابرگ ۵۰۰ هزارتومان بیشتر شد ! کسری بودجه دوبرابری ! وزیر اقتصاد از افزایش مبلغ کالابرگ گفته است؛ اما منبع تأمین آن، مهمتر از خودِ افزایش است. اگر اعتبار هر نفر فقط ماهانه ۵۰۰ هزار تومان بالا برود و ۸۰ میلیون نفر مشمول باشند، هزینهی جدید طرح به حدود ۴۸۰ همت در سال میرسد؛ رقمی که میتواند کسری بودجه را تقریباً دوبرابر کند. اگر این کسری با خلق پول جبران شود، فشار به ارز و قیمتها افزایش مییابد. در این سناریو…
❤60👍14👾8🕊2🥰2
‼️ تتر ۱۸۵؛ ما اینجا رو برای پله بعدی جذاب میدونیم پله بعدی ۱۸۳ ولی همین الان یک کشتی مورد اصابت قرار گرفت و ممکنه نرسه؛ ولی ما نقدینگی نگه خواهیم داشت، اگرم گارد صعود گرفت زود درگیر میکنیم. 📭 ارتباط با تیم من : @radin_crypto
❤55❤🔥7✍4🐳3⚡1👾1🤗1
🛢️ دیگر نفت مهم نیست ! واگرایی شدید با تتر * (+ تحلیل دقیق ) * ‼️ با آغاز معاملات جهانی، نفت برنت دوباره به آستانهی 90 دلار نزدیک شده است؛ در حالی که دلار و تتر در بازار داخلی همچنان روند کاهشی هفتهی گذشته را ادامه میدهند. از زمان شروع درگیری ایران و آمریکا، این رفتار همزمان کمتر دیده شده بود. در ماههای گذشته، نفت و دلار داخلی تا حد زیادی بهعنوان دو دماسنجِ فضای تنش یا احتمال مذاکره عمل میکردند؛ افزایش ت…
❤57⚡2👌1
این نکته رو بدونید : این روزها خیلی فرصت تو بورس ایران زیاده ! ما هفته ای ۲۰ درصد رو میگیریم تقریبا مهم نیست کریپتو تو رکوده وقتی دنبال منشا پول باشی : فرصت هارو پیدا میکنی و استفاده میکنی !
❤🔥57❤32🏆8👌4✍3🎅1
😎 فاجعه OMP phinex به چه دلیلی رخ داد ؟ مطلع عرض میکنم خدمت تون : اتفاقی که برای این صرافی افتاد جزو کیس های بسیار نادر بود که نه به خاطر هک یا از دست رفتن دارایی ها و فقط بخاطر اقدامات و طرح های بسیار پرریسک و جسورانه و بدون پشتوانه این ساختار از دست در رفت. مشکلاتی که از چند ماه پیش برداشت ها را دچار تاخیر های چند روزه کرد، طی دوماه گذشته منجر به جمع شدن هر دو دفتر مشهد و تهران شد و عواقب بسیار شدید و مخربی را …
❤77😱19👍6⚡5🤗3✍2👾1
😎 طلا فیزیکی بخریم یا طلای دیجیتال؟ خرید طلا همیشه یکی از گزینههای محبوب برای حفظ ارزش سرمایه بوده؛ اما شیوهی خرید، روی هزینه، سرعت معامله و مدیریت سرمایه اثر زیادی دارد. در طلای فیزیکی، معمولاً با اجرت ساخت، اختلاف قیمت خرید و فروش، دغدغهی نگهداری و محدودیت ساعت بازار روبهرو هستیم. فروش بخشی از دارایی یا جابهجایی آن هم همیشه بهسادگی انجام نمیشود. اونس طلای توکنیزهشده این مسیر را منعطفتر میکند: بدون اجرت…
❤44🥰3👍1
🚨 وال استریت ژورنال: ترامپ به طور خصوصی به دستیاران ارشد خود گفته اگر تهران تنگه هرمز را به طور کامل بازگشایی کند، ممکن است جنگ با ایران را بدون توافق هستهای پایان دهد! 📝 این میتواند نشان دهنده فشار سیاسی - اقتصادی شدید روی ترامپ باشد. همین دو روز پیش ترامپ دعوای جدی ای با تیم نظامی خود بر سر اعلام کمبود شدید ذخایر موشکی کرده بود موضوعی که بد یا دیر به اطلاع ترامپ رسانده شده بود ! امیدوارم با باز شدن تنگه هرمز …
👍56❤21😎11🕊4✍3
‼️ عراقچی : به توافق بسیار نزدیکیم ایران و عمان به توافقی نهایی درباره ایجاد یک مسیر دریانوردی جدید از طریق تنگه هرمز بسیار نزدیک شدهاند. مانند پیشبینی ها : بورس در حال اوج گرفتن و تتر در حال ریزش است. بورس را که در دو ایکس وارد شدیم : تتر هم گفتیم فرصت خریده همه ش
❤71🐳5👍5🥰4❤🔥3👌2😎2🎅1
اینکه دبیر شورای امنیت ملی عوض شده معنا دارد ! آن هم الان و در شرف توافق !
🤝90❤35🔥6🎅4🐳1
تتر ۱۸۷۷۰۰ ؛ برای یک پله ورود منطقیه
🙏40❤20👍15👌4👾3😱2
😎 این مدل رو تست کنید : بنا به تجربه و توصیه میگم درآمدی که میسازه سورپرایز کننده است. مثل جیب یک لباس قدیمی که توش پول پیدا میکنی منتها اینجا از جنس تتره و همیشه هم میمونه براتون 😎 این پست رو ببینید 😎 این هم صفحه اختصاصی پارتنرشیپ
❤27👏5👌3🔥2
Showing the 12 most recent of 29 posts we hold for @radin_trade. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 417,693 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 12 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Radin trade | رادین ترید” (@radin_trade), 58,940 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/radin_trade.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.