Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 58% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
27 measurements spanning 94 days, net -1,384. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 6,034–7,834 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 27
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
9 Nov 2026, 08:00
6,242
-20
5 Nov 2026, 21:07
6,262
-13
2 Nov 2026, 18:09
6,275
-22
31 Oct 2026, 01:49
6,297
-11
27 Oct 2026, 22:39
6,308
-19
25 Oct 2026, 02:55
6,327
-36
22 Oct 2026, 07:28
6,363
-55
18 Oct 2026, 23:26
6,418
-181
15 Oct 2026, 20:34
6,599
-14
13 Oct 2026, 06:17
6,613
-31
6 Oct 2026, 14:38
6,644
-231
29 Sept 2026, 13:01
6,875
-53
19 Sept 2026, 08:20
6,928
-28
14 Sept 2026, 21:19
6,956
-23
11 Sept 2026, 14:02
6,979
-28
6 Sept 2026, 17:58
7,007
-8
2 Sept 2026, 01:53
7,015
-22
30 Aug 2026, 03:35
7,037
-139
26 Aug 2026, 22:36
7,176
-9
24 Aug 2026, 01:28
7,185
first reading
Engagement
131 posts held, back to 29 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 23 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
5.38%
avg views ÷ 6,242 subscribers
Avg views / post
336
40 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.21%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
40
of 131 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 39 of 40 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 November 2026
Posts held
131 (29 July 2026 – 5 November 2026)
Views total
13,430
Reactions total
288
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
6 Nov 2026, 14:49 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
1m 12s
Average length
14s
Measured directly from 5 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
1,079 reactions across 130 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 47.9% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
517
47.9%
👍
213
19.7%
🤣
171
15.8%
🔥
126
11.7%
👏
17
1.58%
💔
11
1.02%
🗿
10
0.927%
😭
6
0.556%
🐳
3
0.278%
👀
3
0.278%
😱
2
0.185%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 130 of the 131 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,079 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 131 most recent posts we hold, published 29 July 2026 to 5 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 131 we hold a reading for · 0.8%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @HypodropIR. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 131 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 29 July 2026 to 5 November 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 4 of 40 posts held from the last 30 days (10.0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
🎃 Pumpkin Pit × HypoDrop Giveaway!
We've got 5 GTD Free Mint spots for our community!
Pumpkin Pit is a free pixel roguelike game on Robinhood Chain. Jump in, play, and see how deep you can go!
🎮 Collection Supply: 555
🎟 Mint: FREE
🪙 Token: $PIT
Giveaway is live on X! 👇
https://x.com/Hypodrop/status/2118400648568029605
Good luck, everyone! ❤️
#Primus
☑️ برای Primus یادتون نره حتما بزنین ی افزونه ازتون میخواد نصب کنین که افزونش مشکل امنیتی ای نداره نصب میکنین جون وقتی بخواین سوشیال وریفای کنین خودش واستون وریفای میکنه :
🔗 لینک
🌟 تو عکس هم میببنین اکثرا سوشیال هست پس اگه دارین حتما روش فعالیت داشته باشین احتمالا ایردراپش تو همین ماه هست !
✅ با توییت زیر هم تعامل داشته باشین که برای Primus نوشته شده :
▶️ https://x.com/Hypodrop/status/2118296262692774357…
✅ اگه ان اف تی nulora روی XMR رو مینت کردین الان باید کلیم کنین که داخل عکس مشخصه :
▶️ https://nulora.io/portfolio?tab=reservations
💜 مارکت پلیسشم بعد اینکه همه کلیم کردن لایو میشه
🔥 برنده های این پست دلاری هم مشخص شدن که از لینک زیر میتونین جک کنین :
https://x.com/hypodrop/status/2118071901952380953?a=IJS6Ggg2MkwL8fV0odo&s=46
مبارک برنده ها باشه ❤️
کلی گیواوی دیگه در راهه 😉
بیتکوین هم بعد از برخورد با حمایت EMA 200 تقریبا 5درصد اومد بالا.
همچنان وضعیت آلتکوینها فاجعه هست.
بهترین گزینه همون بیتکوین و اتریوم بقیه دیوارن.
❤3👍1
Signed MirStriker
Showing the 12 most recent of 131 posts we hold for @HypodropIR. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts recorded as deleted after publishing
We recorded 6 posts on @HypodropIR as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.
A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.
First seen missing
8 August 2026
Most recent seen missing
20 August 2026
Median time before seen missing
29 hours
Seen missing in the last 30 days
0
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
دوره شاتل آیولرن 🚀 هوش مصنوعی و برنامه نویسی @aiolearn_academy · 39,191 Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 57 here — alongside 56 others — read 30 August 2026
کریپتو شیروانی @shirvanico · 47,669 Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 24 August 2026
Erfan MMS VIP @erfanmms · 44,985 Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 10 September 2026
Mahya zinati | محیا زینتی @mahyaznt · 31,804 Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 61 here — alongside 60 others — read 4 September 2026
ساهوش | sahoosh @sahoosh_ai · 95,308 Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 24 August 2026
Lasttrader.eth @ETHlasttrader · 41,825 Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 27 August 2026
بازار مالی | امینیان @Tahlil_aminian · 92,709 Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 20 August 2026
سبقت از تورم با فرشید فرخی @farshid_io · 295,992 Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 24 August 2026
Daniibtc @GreenTradeAca · 22,734 Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 21 September 2026
Mehdi Moghimi | Precesion Signals @Precesion_Signals · 38,386 Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 66 here — alongside 65 others — read 16 September 2026
دنیای ورزش @spoort_world · 21,450 Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 61 here — alongside 60 others — read 28 September 2026
ACE CRYPTO @acenot · 28,054 Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 9 September 2026
nabu @web3nabu · 54,612 Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 26 August 2026
ترید با هوش مصنوعی @hedayatinvest · 36,804 Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 26 September 2026
آقای تحلیلگر | حسین نصیری @nasiirry · 38,069 Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 6 September 2026
علوم غریبه(دعانویسی و سرکتاب) @olomgharibe313 · 67,995 Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 52 here — alongside 51 others — read 1 September 2026
Radin trade | رادین ترید @radin_trade · 64,074 Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 22 August 2026
کانال خبری و تحلیلی امیر احمدی @amirahmadifar_ir · 66,349 Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 20 August 2026
تحلیلگر اقتصادی | علیرضا سلاجقه @myalirezavip · 18 Telegram ranks this channel #31 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 29 September 2026
معرفی nft های برتر/ ایردراپ @nftbartar · 19,497 Telegram ranks this channel #32 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 29 September 2026
📈ℙ𝕙𝕠𝕖𝕟𝕚𝕩 𝕌𝕟𝕚𝕧𝕖𝕣𝕤𝕚𝕥𝕪📉 @heisedris · 57,790 Telegram ranks this channel #34 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 23 August 2026
آقای ایردراپ @mr_airdrops1 · 52,323 Telegram ranks this channel #34 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 23 August 2026
Rastad | راستاد @rastad · 357,543 Telegram ranks this channel #35 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 10 August 2026
MAHAN Crypto💵🐦🔥🐦🔥 @cryptomahanbit · 41,352 Telegram ranks this channel #36 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 25 August 2026
This channel appears in 38 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 November 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“HypoDrop | هایپودراپ” (@HypodropIR), 6,242 subscribers as measured 9 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/HypodropIR.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.