نمیدونم سیگنال میمکوین بدم یا نه … چون وقتی میخرید پامپ میکنه ولی وقتی میفروشید چارتو نابود میکنید خدایی …!! این الان چارت میمکوین BULL ببینید چیکار کردین باهاش!!
😁81👍17❤12😱10🐳5

Channel
@GreenTradeAca
On this record: Topic · Observations · Channels linked by matching posts · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
22,734subscribers
-221 since we began measuring on 11 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1001466685606 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @GreenTradeAca |
| Created | Between 1 April 2019 and 31 October 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 11 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 11 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 60 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 11 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/GreenTradeAca |
Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.
Posts published here appear in near-verbatim form on 1 other registered channel. This entry also forms a group of 2 channels linked by matching posts. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.
| Posted first | Then | Overlap | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| @GreenTradeAca/6369 · this entry8 Aug 2026, 16:52 UTC | @IRMEMECOlN/73068 Aug 2026, 21:00 UTC | 1.00 | 4.1 hours |
| @GreenTradeAca/6371 · this entry8 Aug 2026, 19:25 UTC | @IRMEMECOlN/73088 Aug 2026, 21:01 UTC | 1.00 | 1.6 hours |
| @GreenTradeAca/6380 · this entry11 Aug 2026, 08:08 UTC | @IRMEMECOlN/731611 Aug 2026, 08:32 UTC | 1.00 | 23 minutes |
| @GreenTradeAca/6382 · this entry11 Aug 2026, 08:14 UTC | @IRMEMECOlN/731711 Aug 2026, 08:32 UTC | 1.00 | 18 minutes |
| @GreenTradeAca/6398 · this entry13 Aug 2026, 08:24 UTC | @IRMEMECOlN/732013 Aug 2026, 08:38 UTC | 1.00 | 14 minutes |
| @GreenTradeAca/6402 · this entry14 Aug 2026, 16:24 UTC | @IRMEMECOlN/732414 Aug 2026, 19:51 UTC | 1.00 | 3.5 hours |
| Channel | Matching posts | Text overlap | Typical gap | Published first |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| @IRMEMECOlN | 8 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed) | 1.00 | 59 minutes | this entry (8–0) |
Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.
What this cannot establish
MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.
Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. None of the 0 matches recorded here fall after that date, so for this entry we cannot say whether any of them carried a credit. The duplication is measured; the absence of attribution is not.
“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 20 comparable posts for this entry, running 5 August 2026 to 15 August 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.
The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.
Of the group of 2 channels, the one whose matching posts we hold earliest is @GreenTradeAca — which is this entry. That is a statement about our reading window, not a claim of authorship.
Recorded under the key clone_source, last confirmed 11 November 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.
This channel is in a group of 2 registered channels linked by matching posts. Links are found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register.
Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown in this list. “First” could only mean first in our own crawl, which depends on how deep we happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. Our one hand-check read 45 of the highest-confidence flagged pairs against the live Telegram pages. In 18 of them the live page showed a “Forwarded from” credit that our database had no record of, so reading that pair as an unattributed copy was wrong; the check did not measure who published first. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Near-verbatim matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 11 Nov 2026, 01:49 | 22,734 | -37 |
| 9 Nov 2026, 11:07 | 22,771 | -35 |
| 8 Nov 2026, 05:18 | 22,806 | -23 |
| 7 Nov 2026, 03:57 | 22,829 | -31 |
| 6 Nov 2026, 02:50 | 22,860 | -29 |
| 5 Nov 2026, 03:47 | 22,889 | -20 |
| 4 Nov 2026, 02:57 | 22,909 | -10 |
| 3 Nov 2026, 03:36 | 22,919 | -18 |
| 2 Nov 2026, 04:26 | 22,937 | -50 |
| 1 Nov 2026, 05:21 | 22,987 | -36 |
| 31 Oct 2026, 05:28 | 23,023 | -18 |
| 30 Oct 2026, 08:29 | 23,041 | -2 |
| 29 Oct 2026, 09:14 | 23,043 | -24 |
| 28 Oct 2026, 07:40 | 23,067 | -35 |
| 27 Oct 2026, 04:17 | 23,102 | -36 |
| 26 Oct 2026, 05:00 | 23,138 | -27 |
| 25 Oct 2026, 02:11 | 23,165 | -11 |
| 24 Oct 2026, 01:47 | 23,176 | -31 |
| 22 Oct 2026, 23:56 | 23,207 | +9 |
| 21 Oct 2026, 20:57 | 23,198 | first reading |
51 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 10 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 51 posts for this entry, the most recent from 15 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
4,156 reactions across 51 posts, in 21 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 56.5% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 2,349 | 56.5% | |
| 🔥 | 444 | 10.7% | |
| 👍 | 441 | 10.6% | |
| 😍 | 141 | 3.39% | |
| 💯 | 139 | 3.34% | |
| 🐳 | 121 | 2.91% | |
| 😁 | 113 | 2.72% | |
| 👏 | 108 | 2.60% | |
| 🙏 | 103 | 2.48% | |
| ❤🔥 | 72 | 1.73% | |
| 😱 | 52 | 1.25% | |
| 🤩 | 18 | 0.433% | |
| 👌 | 15 | 0.361% | |
| 😢 | 12 | 0.289% | |
| 🤯 | 11 | 0.265% | |
| 🥰 | 6 | 0.144% | |
| 😈 | 5 | 0.12% | |
| 🆒 | 2 | 0.048% | |
| 🕊 | 2 | 0.048% | |
| 🎉 | 1 | 0.024% | |
| 1 further kind | 1 | 0.024% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 51 of the 51 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 4,156 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 51 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 15 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
نمیدونم سیگنال میمکوین بدم یا نه … چون وقتی میخرید پامپ میکنه ولی وقتی میفروشید چارتو نابود میکنید خدایی …!! این الان چارت میمکوین BULL ببینید چیکار کردین باهاش!!
😁81👍17❤12😱10🐳5
چون آموزشهای CT هم داخل این کانال گذاشته شده فقط یکهفته وقت دارید عضو کانال بشید تا هفته آینده شنبه 31 مرداد فرصت دارید بریم برای سیگنال بعدی 😎
❤35😍3🙏3🐳2🔥2
این فرصت مخصوص دانشجوهای CT بود که برای اولین بار دارم بصورت عمومی اعلام میکنم ✅ از طریق ربات زیر میتونید سریع عضو کانال سیگنال کریپتویی ما بشید 👇 🤖 @Mohatrade_bot
🔥21❤6😍5🐳2🙏2
Voice message, posted without a caption
🔥14❤9🙏2💔1😍1
مخصوص افرادیه که نمیتونن تو دوره CT شرکت کنن ولی میخوان بخشی از خدمات دوره رو بصورت رایگان داشته باشن
🙏41❤13🔥7😍7🐳5
این فرصت مخصوص افرادیه که میخوان شخصا با منو تیمم ترید کنن مخصوص افرادیه که وقتی نت قطع شد ذهنشون درگیره درامد مازاد نباشه و درامد روزانه دلاری داشته باشن
❤54🐳3🤩3😍2🔥1
بریم برای معرفی فرصت
❤46😍6🐳3👏3🔥2
هفته معاملاتی پرسودی رو برای همتون آرزو میکنیم ❤️ امروز فرصت ویژه معرفی میشه 🔥
❤85🔥10🥰3🐳2😍1
شات سود دانشجوهای CT 🔥 دوره CT فقط شامل میمکوین نیست!! آموزش شکار میمکوین پامپی آموزش فیوچرز آموزش صفرتاصد مارکت کریپتو سیگنال فیوچرز سیگنال میمکوین گروه مخصوص برای دانشجوها لایوهای هفتگی و … #MAKE_CT_GREAT_AGAIN 🐸
❤25🔥3😍3🐳1👏1
$BULL همچنان تو ناحیه ورودمون داره رنج میزنه و خیلی خستمون کرد!! 😒 همچنان نظرم روی این میمکوین مثبته ولی همینجا سربهسر میام بیرون و منتظر نقطه ورود مطمئن تر میمونم
❤47👍6👌4🙏3💯2
تا شنبه برید تفریح و استراحت ولی از هفته اینده سوپرایز بزرگی براتون دارم 😎
❤123👏16😍9🐳3👍2
ولی همون بنزین 20 و 30 هزار تومن با خودش تورم و رکود شدید میاره شما فکرکن چقدر پول چاپ بشه
❤66😢9👍4👏1💯1
Showing the 12 most recent of 51 posts we hold for @GreenTradeAca. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 21 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 12 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 11 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Daniibtc” (@GreenTradeAca), 22,734 subscribers as measured 11 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/GreenTradeAca.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.