International news — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 8 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 43% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Observations
These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.
Content that also appears on other registered channels
Posts published here appear word for word on 1 other registered channel. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.
Matching posts — open both and compare (5 of the pairs behind the counts below)
Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.
What this cannot establish
MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.
Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. None of the 0 matches recorded here fall after that date, so for this entry we cannot say whether any of them carried a credit. The duplication is measured; the absence of attribution is not.
“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 31 comparable posts for this entry, running 4 August 2026 to 7 August 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.
The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.
Verbatim republication has three causes and the text separates only two: a clone/mirror, unattributed copy-paste, or BOTH channels copying a common third source that neither attributes. The spread filter (content held by at most 8 channels) reduces the third and does not remove it.
'Earliest' means earliest IN THIS CORPUS. A channel ingested one page deep will look younger than a neighbour ingested in full; corpus_coverage above is there to be checked before the direction is believed.
shared_verified_est extrapolates the sampled pass rate over the full narrow match count; sampled/passed are the numbers actually measured.
Absence of a forward header is not proof of intent: Telegram lets a channel disable forward attribution, and a credit written in the body is not parsed as attribution here (mention_edge_either_way above is the closest available signal).
Across the whole group of 2, the earliest publisher we hold is @hoseini — which is this entry. That is a statement about our reading window, not a claim of authorship.
Recorded under the key clone_source, last confirmed 8 August 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.
Also posting the same content
This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 1 other registered channel, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.
Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.
8 measurements spanning 7 days, net -1,506. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 312,996–314,954 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
12 Aug 2026, 17:34
313,222
-240
11 Aug 2026, 14:36
313,462
-200
10 Aug 2026, 14:25
313,662
-255
9 Aug 2026, 11:01
313,917
-179
8 Aug 2026, 14:27
314,096
-219
7 Aug 2026, 13:47
314,315
-261
6 Aug 2026, 15:43
314,576
-152
6 Aug 2026, 02:15
314,728
first reading
Engagement
54 posts held, back to 4 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 17 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
9.01%
avg views ÷ 313,222 subscribers
Avg views / post
28,200
54 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.886%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
54
of 54 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 August 2026
Posts held
54 (4 August 2026 – 12 August 2026)
Views total
1,523,210
Reactions total
13,503
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
12 Aug 2026, 17:51 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈1,020
Videos
≈213
Links
≈184
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
5m 11s
Average length
5m 11s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
11,246 reactions across 43 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 38.8% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
😁
4,369
38.8%
👎
2,488
22.1%
❤
2,313
20.6%
👍
1,485
13.2%
👏
385
3.42%
😢
199
1.77%
🙏
7
0.062%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 54 of the 54 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 13,503reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 54 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 12 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
‼️ ترامپ:
آمریکا کنترل کامل بر تنگه هرمز دارد. فکر میکنم که آن را حفظ خواهیم کرد!
ایران نیروی دریایی یا هوایی ندارد، سربازان باقیماندهاش حقوق نمیگیرند و نیروهای سپاه پاسداران نابود شدهاند.
رهبری ایران در وضعیت بلاتکلیفی قرار دارد، پول کم دارد و وضعیت کشورشان کاملاً در حال فروپاشی است.
ایران چیزی جز اخبار جعلی و نرخ تورم ۳۰۰ درصدی ندارد و اوضاع بدتر هم میشود.
ایران فقط حرف میزند و عمل نمیکند و دیگر قلدر خ…
‼️ خبرنگار الجزیره:
مذاکرات ایران و آمریکا درباره تنگه هرمز ظاهراً بار دیگر به نقطه آغاز بازگشته و در شرایط فعلی، توپ در زمین واشنگتن است.
ممکن است تهران به این نتیجه رسیده باشد که نحوه عبور از تنگه هرمز نمیتواند صرفاً بر اساس خواستههای آمریکا تعیین شود.
با این حال، تلاشهای دیپلماتیک و میانجیگریها متوقف نشده و احتمالاً در روزهای آینده اهمیت بیشتری پیدا خواهند کرد.
📱@HOSEINI ✅
‼️ شبکه الجزیره: تنگه هرمز عملا به گرهای در مذاکرات ایران و آمریکا تبدیل شده است
تهران بازگشایی تنگه هرمز را به لغو محاصره دریایی و تحریمها، آزادسازی داراییهای مسدود شده، جبران خسارات جنگی و توقف تهدیدها و حملات علیه ایران و متحدانش مرتبط میداند.
غنیسازی، تحریمها و نظارت، موضوعات قابل مذاکره در چارچوب توافق نهایی هستند.
📱@HOSEINI ✅
‼️ والاستریت ژورنال :
مسئولان ارشد دولت و کاخ سفید به ترامپ توصیه کردهاند که تشدید تحریمهای فعلی و اعمال تحریمهای جدید علیه ایران، ممکن است موثرترین راه برای وادار کردن ایران به تسلیم باشد.
📱@HOSEINI ✅
‼️ ترامپ: من هم از ایران میخواهم خسارات ما را جبران کند
ایران خواستار جبران خسارات ناشی از درگیریهای نظامی پنج ماهه است و من نیز از آن کشور خواهان جبران خسارت هستم.
📱@HOSEINI ✅
‼️ سخنگوی وزارت خارجه:
دعوتنامهای برای سفر رئیس مجلس و وزیر امور خارجه از طرف پاکستان واصل شده و هر وقت که زمان مناسب باشد، این سفر انجام خواهد شد
📱@HOSEINI ✅
‼️ ترامپ:
ایران پولی ندارد!
نتیجه ۵۱ سال رفتار بد!
در نمودار نشان داده میشود که ارزش یک میلیون ریال ایران از حدود ۱.۱۱ دلار در ابتدای ۲۰۲۵ به حدود ۵۳ سنت در سهماهه سوم ۲۰۲۶ رسیده است.
در انتهای نمودار نوشته شده: «پولشان آشغال است».
📱@HOSEINI ✅
‼️ ترامپ: تصمیم گرفتیم با ایران تنشزدایی کنیم
ما داریم این موضوع را بیسروصدا پیش میبریم.
📱@HOSEINI ✅
😁238❤58👎39👍24👏8
Showing the 12 most recent of 54 posts we hold for @hoseini. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 427,962 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Mentions
Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s.When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 10 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
𝐖𝐇𝐀𝐋𝐄 𝐅𝐗 | سیگنال رایگان ، فارکس @WhAleir_fx · 775,562 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 8 August 2026
𝐀𝐑𝐙 𝐏𝐑𝐎𝐗𝐘 | ارز دیجیتال @ARZ_PROXY · 1,610,436 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 8 August 2026
Ali Hasani @alihasanivip · 499,935 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 65 here — alongside 64 others — read 12 August 2026
Empire Of Iran 🇮🇷 @IranianEmpireOfficial · 152,126 Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 51 here — alongside 50 others — read 12 August 2026
tradehadi /ترید هادی @trade_hadi · 468,226 Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 10 August 2026
WHALE CRYPTO @CrWhale · 845,232 Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 8 August 2026
موزیک-ریمیکس-آهنگ-سیستمی رپی @Musicaeel · 1,063,821 Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 8 August 2026
ریمیکس رپی | Remix Rapi @ReMiXeRapY · 2,155,347 Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 7 August 2026
سرمایه گذاری درامد دلاری بیت کوین و ماینینگ ترید و تریدر ایرانی الاصل دکتر علی رضایی @supertraderirani · 346,621 Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 12 August 2026
Gold Signal | PUB @GoldSignalORG · 165,090 Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 12 August 2026
دکس لند ترید @tonwos · 180,565 Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 12 August 2026
CoinSpark ⚡️ @CoinSparks · 239,312 Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 11 August 2026
پرامپت | هوش مصنوعی @promptfre · 430,590 Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 10 August 2026
چرچیل " Mr. Churchill @Churchill_Tahlil · 251,599 Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 10 August 2026
هوش مصنوعی | تکنولوژی | فناوری | ترفند @mobsec_ai · 465,327 Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 10 August 2026
رسانه مردمی | اخبار جنگ @resane_mardomy · 149,926 Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 12 August 2026
کافه کتاب 📚 @KafeeKtab · 174,285 Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 12 August 2026
میکس رپی | ترکی سیستمی @MIXTARKIBI · 235,942 Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 53 here — alongside 52 others — read 11 August 2026
سیگنال رایگان فارکس | آموزش فارکس @forextrder1 · 311,984 Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 50 here — alongside 49 others — read 10 August 2026
کانال دانلود تکنولوژی هوش مصنوعی @roidbest · 1,674,837 Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 8 August 2026
ریمیکس - آهنگ موزیک ترکی @AHANGAWMEH · 1,481,693 Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 10 August 2026
دکتر کاویانی | منتور رشد بیزینس @drkavyanii22 · 199,867 Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 11 August 2026
دلقک نباشیم @DontBeAnClown · 157,990 Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 12 August 2026
CryptoSaba @cryptosaba · 202,566 Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 11 August 2026
This channel appears in 83 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Hoseini Finance” (@hoseini), 313,222 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/hoseini.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
