9 measurements spanning 8 days, net -19. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 30,787–30,812 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
13 Aug 2026, 23:48
30,790
-10
11 Aug 2026, 17:47
30,800
+3
10 Aug 2026, 16:37
30,797
-1
9 Aug 2026, 14:13
30,798
+1
8 Aug 2026, 11:33
30,797
-6
7 Aug 2026, 08:04
30,803
-4
6 Aug 2026, 10:11
30,807
-2
6 Aug 2026, 01:51
30,809
no change
5 Aug 2026, 22:00
30,809
first reading
Engagement
14 posts held, back to 19 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 20 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
49.6%
avg views ÷ 30,790 subscribers
Avg views / post
15,300
14 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.19%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
14
of 14 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 4 August 2026
Posts held
14 (19 July 2026 – 4 August 2026)
Views total
213,800
Reactions total
4,687
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
14 Aug 2026, 14:22 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
664
Videos
110
Links
883
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 14 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Video runtime
12m 42s
Average length
6m 21s
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
4,687 reactions across 14 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 19.8% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
929
19.8%
🤣
839
17.9%
😱
812
17.3%
😢
707
15.1%
🤬
498
10.6%
👍
403
8.60%
💯
168
3.58%
🔥
156
3.33%
👎
137
2.92%
💔
38
0.811%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 14 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 4,687reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 14 most recent posts we hold, published 19 July 2026 to 4 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
44
across the posts below
Posts paid on
14
of 14 we hold a reading for · 100%
Most on one post
15
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @orthozombies. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 14 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 19 July 2026 to 4 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
"Русская община" анонсировала на 6 сентября Общемосковский крестный ход. Так что слухи о том, что в АП были недовольны прошлогодней манифестацией, оказались не соответствовавшими действительности. Наоборот - разрешили повторить, санкционировали регулярность.
Накануне выборов пустить православно-националистическую общественность с массовым мероприятием на улицы Москвы - это не может быть не согласовано. В этом полит…
Кто любит по воскресеньям потыкать что-нибудь на Ютьюбе, вот вчера поговорили с настоящим Евгением Киселевым ("Итоги"! НТВ! 90-е!) о том, о сём
❗️И по-прежнему очень важна ваша поддержка через Patreon! Огромное спасибо всем, кто подписан! 🌸
Разово поддержать можно (и нужно😘) через Paypal❗️
Звезды телеграма, лайки и комментарии на разных площадках тоже нужны!
На сайте патриархии в новости о патриаршей литургии в Дивеево, где была произнесена ядерная проповедь, есть еще такая строчка:
Также богослужение посетили блогеры из западных стран — участники блог-тура «Арзамасские купола и Дивеевские торжества», организованного нижегородским кадровым агентством «ОКА» совместно с Нижегородской епархией
Пока не удалось найти, кто же эти блогеры и из каких они стран.
Зато есть сайт …
Вот такую новую видеоикону, практически арт-объект, опубликовал вчера в своем тг-канале на миллион с лишним подписчиков Константин Малофеев.
Мне кажется, это очень хорошо именно как икона атомного православия.
А всё потому, что патриарх Кирилл вчера служил в Дивеево и в очередной раз сообщил, что
создание грозного оружия в нашей стране именно в этом месте не было случайностью; все это происходило в том числе и по м…
Погиб на войне в Украине сын протоиерея Александра Ильяшенко Сергей Ильяшенко 1991-го года рождения.
У отца Александра было 12 детей, его жена — из священнического рода Амбарцумовых, внучка расстрелянного в 1937-м году новомученика.
Это такая классическая семья эпохи православного возрождения, из круга монархистов-диссидентов советского времени, которые получили власть на приходском уровне в 1990-е и стали насаждать…
Священник Александр Занемонец написал отзыв на нашу с протоиереем Алексием Уминским книжку.
Вот он:
"Дочитал очень важную, как мне кажется, книгу о. Алексия Уминского и Ксении Лученко "Церковный автостоп" (2026).
Начал в рижской кофейне (напротив дома, где родилась м. Мария Скобцова). Продолжил в финском городке. И завершил на пароме из Хельсинки в Таллинн.
Как книга и писалась - в пути и о пути.
Отец Алексей - оди…
Митрополит Иларион Алфеев так и не доехал до Бразилии. Можно только догадываться, какой шел торг, какие люди за него просили, как он, бедный, изворачивался.
Но патриарх изменил свое решение (чего он вообще почти никогда не делает и категорически не любит) и под предлогом того, что Илариону надо заботиться о престарелой матери (что правда), ему определили служить в Крестовоздвиженском женском монастыре под Москвой. Во…
Вчера день святого князя Владимира проходил как-то без огонька - на традиционной литургии в Успенском соборе и крестном ходе к истукану у Боровицких ворот даже верного Слуцкого не было, уровень представительства средненький - замы министров и руководители департаментов - остальные, видать, на каникулах, на курортах Хайнаня. Но за главного именинника помолились:
о Президенте страны нашея Российския, ныне тезоименитом…
Меж тем к Христову дню, ой, то есть, к дню князя Владимира патриарх Кирилл написал книгу. Точнее, как водится, редакторы - неведомые безымянные пчелки, скомпилировали фрагменты его публичных выступлений. И получилось программное высказывание лидера РПЦ о войне. Никакой не СВО, она ж метафизическая.
Не то чтоб высказывания патриарха носили вероучительный характер, но на конкретном историческом отрезке противоречить эт…
Вчера патриарх Иерусалимский Феофил приезжал на Фанар к Вселенскому патриарху Варфоломею.
Говорили в основном, как следует из официальных сообщений, о ситуации на Святой Земле и христианах Ближнего Востока.
И всё это было бы ничем особо не примечательно, если бы в начале июня после встречи Феофила с Трампом не было странной утечки, что он теперь посредник в переговорах по Украине, чуть ли не "посланник Трампа" и чт…
Военный отдел РПЦ сообщает, что сегодня день военного духовенства.
Эта дата установлена в память о решении возродить институт военного священства, принятом в 2009 году именно в день Казанской иконы — издревле почитаемой покровительницы русского воинства
.
А на фотографии - крестный ход с иконой великомученика Никиты "по окопам и блиндажам 266-го батальона"
Это к вопросу о том, что по линии фронта все время возят к…
🤣82😱56😢40🤬26❤17👎16👍8💔6
Showing the 12 most recent of 14 posts we hold for @orthozombies. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 232,592 of 1,340,412entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 5 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cross-platform identity — Wikidata
A Wikidata item names this Telegram handle as belonging to the entity it describes. This is Wikidata’s claim, not a verification made by this register — nobody here confirmed that the account is genuinely operated by the entity named. Wikidata content is CC0; every fact below is dated to when it was read from Wikidata, not to when the association was first made there.
This handle named by sources this register does not control and did not measure — each shown exactly as found, attributed by name, dated to when it was read.
Wikipedia
One Wikipedia article names this handle in its article text, found by searching for a t.me link inside the article source. A citation is a notability signal, not a verification: nobody here confirmed the cited post is genuine or still says what the article quotes. Article text is CC BY-SA 4.0, Wikipedia contributors; snippets below are short excerpts.
Лученко, Ксения Валерьевна(ru.wikipedia.org) “…|access-date = 2026-03-11}}{{cite web |author = |lang = |url = https://t.me/orthozombies |url-status = live |archive-url = |archive-date = |title = Православие…” read 9 August 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Православие и зомби” (@orthozombies), 30,790 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/orthozombies.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
