Channel
@darktheology
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
6,972subscribers
+8 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001258114749 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @darktheology |
| Description | Канал Андрея Шишкова об экспериментальной теологии в объектно-ориентированной перспективе Другие каналы автора: https://t.me/radio_harman/ https://t.me/metaphysical_diary/ Обратная связь: @and_shishkov |
| Created | 24 January 2021 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 16 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 5 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 16 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/darktheology |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 16 Aug 2026, 20:37 | 6,972 | -9 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 03:34 | 6,981 | +9 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 07:42 | 6,972 | +8 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 00:23 | 6,964 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 08:51 | 6,964 | first reading |
25 posts held, back to 17 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 11 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 17 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 25 (17 June 2026 – 17 August 2026) |
| Views total | 23,953 |
| Reactions total | 334 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 18 Aug 2026, 09:49 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 18 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
761 reactions across 23 posts, in 26 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 37.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 287 | 37.7% | |
| 🔥 | 192 | 25.2% | |
| 👍 | 80 | 10.5% | |
| ❤🔥 | 54 | 7.10% | |
| 🍾 | 38 | 4.99% | |
| 🥴 | 22 | 2.89% | |
| 🤔 | 14 | 1.84% | |
| 🎉 | 12 | 1.58% | |
| 😁 | 12 | 1.58% | |
| 👏 | 9 | 1.18% | |
| 👎 | 5 | 0.657% | |
| 🎃 | 4 | 0.526% | |
| 🥰 | 4 | 0.526% | |
| 🥱 | 4 | 0.526% | |
| 🆒 | 3 | 0.394% | |
| 👀 | 3 | 0.394% | |
| 😱 | 3 | 0.394% | |
| 🤣 | 3 | 0.394% | |
| 🦄 | 3 | 0.394% | |
| ⚡ | 2 | 0.263% | |
| 6 further kinds | 7 | 0.92% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 25 of the 25 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 923reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 25 most recent posts we hold, published 17 June 2026 to 17 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @darktheology. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 25 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 17 June 2026 to 17 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Сегодня один из подписчиков прислал любопытную вещь. Он попросил ИИ ответить на богословский вопрос так, как если бы на него ответил я из перспективы тёмной теологии. Результат меня слегка озадачил: ИИ решил нагнать мрака, ужаса и хтони в духе Юджина Такера и “мира без нас”, против чего я наоборот всегда выступал. Богословие на основе объектно-ориентированной онтологии максимально не похоже на серию фильмов “Чужие”. …
🔥9😁5🎉4🥱1
В новом ролике для своих подписчиков на Boosty размышляю над оппозицией Бог в душе / Бог в церкви. Обе позиции представляют собой абсолютизацию локусов контроля религиозной жизни – внутри / вовне. Пройти между этими Сциллой и Харибдой можно по пути ритуала. Попутно рассказываю про категорию Nones в современных социологических исследованиях религиозности. https://boosty.to/theologia/posts/26623a1f-3eb3-4293-8ebf-8d1…
❤1🔥1🥱1
По горячим следам нашего разговора с Дмитрием Лепешевым записал реплику со своими мыслями о природе шаманства и фигуре шамана, которая выходит за пределы конкретных исторических традиций шаманизма. https://boosty.to/theologia/posts/51f24784-3f4e-47c5-b52a-ea62b124fede
👍9🥴5🥱2
“Я тоже шаман, но другой…” Утро началось с soul breakfast с Дмитрием Лепешевым, интегральным шаманом, психологом и бывшим православным игуменом. Послушали рассказ про шаманизм — архаичный и современный. Попрактиковали шаманские песни стихий. Потренировали шаманское видение. Обсудили, чем шаман отличается от жреца. Потом, когда все участники разошлись, мы с Димой ещё пару часов обсуждали разные вопросы духовных прак…
🔥15🥴10❤6😁4😱3👍2🤯1
Марк Фишер и Темный Поворот Почему Марк Фишер избежал Темного Поворота? Таким вопросом задался один автор в тематическом тгк, анонсируя курс у себя, за что ему большое спасибо. Философы, да и вообще интеллектуалы, представляются многим людьми свободы. По крайней мере, именно так нас приучила видеть подобные фигуры русская литература XIX века. Внутри этого сеттинга интеллектуалы, как правило, оказываются противоп…
❤14🥴6👍1🤣1
«Где вы были с этим курсом прошлые пять лет? Я искала это – и не находила ни в книгах, ни у священников». Это – слова одной из участниц курса «Практики богопознания», написанные в чате после просмотра половины 1-й лекции. И, действительно, довольно сложно найти пространство для спокойного и взвешенного обсуждения такой сложной, но такой важной для христианской жизни и практики темы. И, судя по активному и интересно…
❤11🔥7👏5
У одного из главных популяризаторов дзен на Западе, Дайсецу Судзуки, есть любопытная попытка сравнения буддийской и христианской доктрин: Все мы живем в обществе, и этика является нашим отношением к социальной жизни. Последователь дзэн также не может жить вне общества. Он не может не принимать по внимание общественные ценности. Однако он стремится очистить свое сердце от заблуждений, проистекающих из знания, которое…
❤29👍8🔥4😁2👎1🥰1
Вчера на дхарма-толке, где мы читаем и обсуждаем мастера Догэна, разбирали такой фрагмент из Сёбогэндзо: Издревле есть речение: если ты не рыба, не знаешь ума рыбы; если ты не птица, не можешь проследить следы птицы. Людей, знающих заключённый здесь смысл, мало. Те, кто думал лишь, что человек не знает ума рыбы и что человек не знает ума птицы, поняли дурно: понять это следует так, что рыбы неизменно знают умы друг …
❤12🤣1
Подписчик моего канала на Boosty задал мне такой вопрос: Что делать если не чувствуешь веру, но хочешь поверить?“ Разбираемся в новом ролике, можно ли почувствовать веру и помогают ли в её обретении логические аргументы и доказательства. https://boosty.to/theologia/posts/e211f2cc-dbf5-4934-b1fd-166ce478b00b
❤17👏1🤪1
Аллан Уоттс – одна из самых противоречивых фигур в сфере религии и духовности середины 20 века. Англиканский священник и один из первых популяризаторов дзен-буддизма на Западе, он одновременно вдохновлял и вызывал раздражение в обоих сообществах – и христианском, и буддийском. Мастера Дайсецу Судзуки и Филип Капло, считали, что он искажал дзен, а Сюнрю Судзуки защищал его, называя великим бодхисаттвой. Бог — это сам…
❤56👍11🔥9🤔3⚡2👎2🕊2
Лето – самое время замедлиться, остановиться, задуматься о вечном и предаться созерцанию. Но как это сделать правильно? С 1 августа на православной просветительской платформе “Жизнь со смыслом” стартует мой новый курс “Практики богопознания”, посвященный христианским созерцательным практикам. Он включает в себя четыре лекции от (1,5 до 2 часов), в которых мы не только будем разбирать различные виды созерцания, связа…
❤22🔥11👀3🍓1👎1
ПОВТОР ВЕБИНАРА с Андреем Шишковым Друзья, по вашим просьбам организовали повторы вебинара «Зачем современному христианину созерцательные практики?» Даты и время: 24 июля в 19:00 25 и 26 июля в 12:00 и 19:00 ➡️ СМОТРЕТЬ ВЕБИНАР
❤7🎉3
Showing the 12 most recent of 25 posts we hold for @darktheology. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 56,365 of 1,548,671entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 6 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Тёмная теология” (@darktheology), 6,972 subscribers as measured 16 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/darktheology.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.