Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for О Церкви и о людях

Channel

О Церкви и о людях

@churchpeople

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

4,286subscribers

-11 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001597021142
TypeChannel
Username@churchpeople
Created2 June 2022measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live20 August 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged2 times, most recently 20 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/churchpeople

Growth

4,2864,2974,291.56 August 2026 — 4,297 subscribers6 August 2026 — 4,294 subscribers9 August 2026 — 4,287 subscribers13 August 2026 — 4,288 subscribers16 August 2026 — 4,286 subscribers6 August 202616 August 2026
5 measurements spanning 10 days, net -11. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 4,284–4,299 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
16 Aug 2026, 20:264,286-2
13 Aug 2026, 01:564,288+1
9 Aug 2026, 23:354,287-7
6 Aug 2026, 19:524,294-3
6 Aug 2026, 11:044,297first reading

Engagement

21 posts held, back to 28 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 5 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
47.1%
avg views ÷ 4,286 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,020
21 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.97%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
21
of 21 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 8 August 2026
Posts held21 (28 July 20268 August 2026)
Views total42,410
Reactions total1,261
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Aug 2026, 11:57 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
1m 33s
Average length
47s

Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

1,261 reactions across 21 posts, in 32 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 18.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
💯23818.9%
😢21717.2%
🙏17513.9%
1269.99%
😭1169.20%
🤯594.68%
👍503.97%
🤔413.25%
👏393.09%
🤡383.01%
💊292.30%
🤮251.98%
🤬231.82%
😱120.952%
👎80.634%
🔥70.555%
🖕70.555%
😁70.555%
🤣70.555%
😈60.476%
12 further kinds312.46%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 21 of the 21 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,261reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 21 most recent posts we hold, published 28 July 2026 to 8 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

8 Aug 2026, 09:40 UTC620 views31 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Позиция Русской Православной Церкви по вопросу о применении ядерного оружия Очень нелишним будет напомнить блогеру Шкилю и Патриарху Кириллу о том, как рассуждала РПЦ о ядерной бомбе и войне еще каких-то 50 лет назад: «Кто сможет определить те материальные и моральные ценности, ради которых следовало бы ввергать мир в бездну столь жестоких страданий и даже уничтожения?! Ядерная война несправедлива и бессмысленна.

👍17💯93🖕2

8 Aug 2026, 05:25 UTC≈1,090 views46 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Отец Андрей Пальчук очень тонко и чисто «по-одесски» (с юмором сквозь слезы) потроллил известного в узких кругах блогера Геннадия Шкиля, который сильно использует свою фантазию, чтобы хоть как-то оправдать «атомное богословие» Патриарха Кирилла. https://t.me/postnoemenypalchuk/7017 К словам отца Андрея хочется добавить только один комментарий от его подписчика: «29 августа 1949 года - у СССР появилась атомная бомб

👏30🖕54😁3🤯2👎1🤗1

7 Aug 2026, 11:39 UTC≈1,400 views35 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Интересно, что теперь в Украине есть целых четыре (!!!) епископа в одном городе: 1. УПЦ: митрополит Сергий 2. ПЦУ: Нестор Писык 3. ПЦУ: Тихон Петранюк 4. УПЦ КП: Спиридон Николишин. Однако, такая ситуация просто уничтожает нормальное понятие о природе Церкви. Напомним простое и очень древнее 8-е правило I Вселенского Собора: не должно быть двух епископов в одном городе. И это не потому, что так удобнее управля

17😢12💯4🥱2

7 Aug 2026, 07:22 UTC≈1,460 views86 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Ситуация, которая говорит сама за себя. Митрополит Львовский Филарет участие в открытии нового реабилитационного корпуса во Львове. Причина проста: митрополит Филарет официально передал здание, ранее принадлежащее УПЦ, Первому медицинскому объединению. Мэр города Андрей Садовой поблагодарил владыку за вклад в развитие общины. Понятно, что владыка пришел туда не по своей инициативе - его НЕ МОГЛИ НЕ ПРИГЛАСИТЬ. Т

💯51😢186🤡5👍2🤷‍♂2🥱2

6 Aug 2026, 13:23 UTC≈1,560 views24 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Архиепископ Албанский Иоанн и Патриарх Александрийский Феодор приедут к Патриарху Варфоломею на Успение Богородицы. С одной стороны, в очередной раз Патриарх Варфоломей не пригласил Петровича из ПЦУ, что хорошо. С другой - он постепенно втягивает Албанского Предстоятеля (как и Болгарского) в круг общения с теми, кто ПЦУ признал. И даже если Архиепископ Иоанн не собирается менять своей позиции относительно Думенко,

10😢82🤔2💯1🥱1

4 Aug 2026, 06:57 UTC≈2,280 views128 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Выжил. Вот это и есть милость Божия, а не бомба!!!

🙏11215😁1

4 Aug 2026, 06:48 UTC≈2,330 views98 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

Вот иллюстрация к этой войне, которую ПК называет «священной». Херсон, человек продает фрукты и овощи. Его атакует дрон. Обе стороны этого конфликта делают вещи, которые не вкладываются в голову. Это - война на истребление. Причем, истребление простого народа. UPD: мужик жив! Слава Богу!

😢54😭20🙏19😨4👎1

4 Aug 2026, 06:27 UTC≈2,140 views88 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Что в книге Патриарха Кирилла прямо противоречит Евангелию? 1. Война не имеет искупительного значения. Потому что, Евангелие называет только один источник искупления - Крест. «Сын Человеческий… пришёл… отдать душу Свою для искупления многих» (Мф. 20:28). «В Котором мы имеем искупление Кровию Его, прощение грехов» (Еф. 1:7; Кол. 1:14). Это совершилось раз и навсегда (Евр. 10:10–14). Говорить, что война имеет «ис

💯48👍11😢10🔥76😱3🤮2👏1

4 Aug 2026, 06:13 UTC≈1,750 views81 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Патриарх Кирилла написал книгу «Война. За пределами видимых причин и следствий». По сути, это развернутое богословско-идеологическое обоснование войны. Когда Патриарх говорил о бомбе, как о милости Божией, можно было подумать, что он просто страдает когнитивным расстройством и просто не понимает, что говорит. Но нет, не страдает. По крайней мере, не в такой степени, чтобы не понимать. Понимает. И даже книгу напис

😢34🤯18💯10👍6🤮53😈2😱2

1 Aug 2026, 15:36 UTC≈2,450 views106 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Патриарх Кирилл: Атомная бомба - милость Божия Честно, не хочется уже комментировать высказывания Патриарха Кирилла, но и молчать не можем. Очередное его высказывание: «В сей святой обители на протяжении долгих лет не было места, где можно было бы помолиться, здесь существовали светские учреждения, которые, на первый взгляд, как бы противоречили всему доброму, хорошему, правильному, включая и веру христианскую, пр

😭33💊29🤮13🤯119😢6👏2🤬1

1 Aug 2026, 11:07 UTC≈2,160 views77 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Патриарх Кирилл высказал соболезнования народу… Ирана. «С болью воспринимаю известия о страдании людей в связи с продолжающимися военными столкновениями в различных регионах мира, и, конечно, сопереживаю тому, что происходит и в Исламской Республике Иран, — сказал Предстоятель Русской Православной Церкви. — Молюсь обо всех, кто переживает тяжелые испытания; о тех, кто потерял близких, о скорейшем наступлении мира и

💯48🤡15🤯53😈3💩2😭1

30 Jul 2026, 08:02 UTC≈2,640 views70 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

Таблетка памяти для Патриарха Кирилла. В 1997 году на программе «Час пик» он говорил очень правильные слова: Что Церковь не должна сращиваться с государством и должна быть голосом совести для общества. Как так получилось, что став Патриархом он вдруг так сильно изменился?

😢35👍12💯12🤡6🤮5

Showing the 12 most recent of 21 posts we hold for @churchpeople. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 513,166 of 1,570,663entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“О Церкви и о людях” (@churchpeople), 4,286 subscribers as measured 16 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/churchpeople.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.