Had a chat w/ Luca Netz, CEO of Pudgy Penguins about TON & Telegram Ecosystems, Gifts and Stickers You can find it here: https://x.com/zeroxcholy/status/1953845649675354139
❤8👍3

Channel
@zeroxcholy
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
92,482subscribers
-519 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002018129097 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @zeroxcholy |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 19 April 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 9 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 13 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/zeroxcholy |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 13 Aug 2026, 01:07 | 92,482 | -81 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 02:12 | 92,563 | -63 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 01:46 | 92,626 | -82 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 01:41 | 92,708 | -81 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 01:11 | 92,789 | -70 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 23:17 | 92,859 | -50 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 21:55 | 92,909 | -92 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 01:34 | 93,001 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 00:55 | 93,001 | first reading |
19 posts held, back to 19 April 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 17 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 8 August 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
3,310 reactions across 17 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 44.2% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 1,463 | 44.2% | |
| 👍 | 887 | 26.8% | |
| 🔥 | 368 | 11.1% | |
| 🐳 | 231 | 6.98% | |
| ⚡ | 85 | 2.57% | |
| 👾 | 71 | 2.15% | |
| 🤝 | 52 | 1.57% | |
| 🦄 | 49 | 1.48% | |
| 🗿 | 38 | 1.15% | |
| ✍ | 37 | 1.12% | |
| 👎 | 29 | 0.876% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 3,310reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 19 April 2024 to 8 August 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @zeroxcholy. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 19 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 19 April 2024 to 8 August 2025. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Had a chat w/ Luca Netz, CEO of Pudgy Penguins about TON & Telegram Ecosystems, Gifts and Stickers You can find it here: https://x.com/zeroxcholy/status/1953845649675354139
❤8👍3
✨ Telegram Mini Apps — the Transformation of Applications The average person spends ~7 hours a day switching between apps and tabs. Mobile apps and social networks are becoming the primary channels of interaction. With each action comes a new interface, a new icon, a new app. But the trend is shifting. We are entering the era of seamless solutions, where the user experience remains in one place. And Telegram Mi…
🔥23❤18👾9👍8🐳1
TON is becoming a hub for other networks Many blockchains are beginning to show interest in the ecosystem, seeing new opportunities within it. But the pioneers are Berachain, who are already bringing their vision under the blue flag with a paper plane. We spoke to 3 key projects from Berachain and found out why they chose TON and how it will change the industry. > You can read the full thread here ✨
❤27⚡13👍9🔥6🐳2
Tabi – The Path to Network Unity We have decided to open your eyes to something that almost no one talks about. Right now, Asia is entering Telegram & TON, and this can completely change web3. Meet Tabichain. The locomotive creating its vision of the GameFi industry. — > READ THE ARTICLE Pivot from a regular NFT marketplace to a blockchain, opening up completely different concepts. Native game development infr…
❤33👍21🐳13🔥3
TON and NFT: A Missed Opportunity or a Sleeping Giant? ㅤ Over the past year, TON has transformed from a local blockchain into a global ecosystem: • The token price has risen from $1 to $7; • TVL has increased from $40 million to $800 million over the year; • Major funds such as Pantera, Delphi Digital, and Binance are investing in TON-based projects; • Important collaborations: Tether, TrustWallet, Hashkey Capital, …
👍31❤15🔥10⚡6🐳3
CRYPTOCHOLY SQUAD IS BACK The NFT market on TON is a desert in the Wild West compared to other blockchains. • Low trading volumes; • Lack of high-profile collections; • Minimum degens; • Only one NFT marketplace The capitalization of top collections is incomparable to giants from Ethereum and Solana. We still haven't seen a massive influx of liquidity into TON NFT. — Lost Dogs — lost plans, lost dreams. 2022 wa…
🔥18❤9🦄9👍8👾7🗿1
Pantera Capital – Visionaries of the VC World A key player in the web3 industry. What are Pantera Capital's achievements? Can the fund truly be called visionary? Why did the fund initially bet on Bitcoin and now on TON Ecosystem? The history of the fund and the view of the future. — > READ THE ARTICLE Pantera Capital is considered a pioneer in the crypto space. Having started with traditional investments, in 20…
👍20❤13🦄6⚡3🔥3🐳2👾1
The Rise and Fall of NFTs? What is happening within the Digital art scene? Where is Modern Art headed today? Each of you heard about NFTs and how this technology has changed the face of the web3 industry. But do you truly understand its impact on the spread of digital art in the 21st century? We have decided to reveal all the secrets of this phenomenon. — ▶️ WATCH THE VIDEO This topic is one of the most importa…
❤17👍14🔥10🐳4🦄1
3301
Hello. We are looking for highly intelligent projects building on telegram/ton. To find them, we have devised an accelerator program. Triangle.tg is opening doors for builders to explore, invent, and discover opportunities within the Telegram and TON ecosystem. This journey begins with initial brand-contributors: Notcoin, Sign, 1inch, alongside a group of experienced mentors providing the resources and vision from…
👍50❤13🗿12✍5🔥5🐳4🤝3
Development of Social-Fi. What Awaits Us in the Future? w/ Kaito.Ai We have written an article about one of the most promising directions for the coming years. SocialFi – a narrative that creates a new vision of the internet movement. A trend that encompasses the best from the long developments of social networks. — > READ THE ARTICLE Social networks are an integral part of our lives. Every day we invest a lot o…
👍52❤12🦄12🐳11👎4👾4🔥4
✨ Crypto affects macro The space is changing. Many do not realize the full scale of the changes that await us in the near future. This article is the sequel to our most famous work. A timeless, major piece. We put a lot of effort into it, involving > 20 web3 enthusiasts, key founders/representatives of projects (TON Foundation, Berachain, Pudgy Penguins, etc). All to uncover the unexplored opportunities of web3 …
👍63🐳57❤41🔥22⚡9🦄6✍5👾5
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @zeroxcholy. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Citation-graph rank — 141,841 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“0xCholy” (@zeroxcholy), 92,482 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/zeroxcholy.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.