Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

earn | early

@earn_early

Verified by Telegram

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

621,464subscribers

-3,803 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 316,228–1,000,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002044683235
TypeChannel
Username@earn_early
Created9 January 2024measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held8
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/earn_early

Topic

Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 8 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 72% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

621,464625,267623,365.56 August 2026 — 625,267 subscribers6 August 2026 — 625,189 subscribers7 August 2026 — 624,420 subscribers8 August 2026 — 623,805 subscribers9 August 2026 — 623,318 subscribers10 August 2026 — 622,764 subscribers11 August 2026 — 622,083 subscribers12 August 2026 — 621,464 subscribers6 August 202612 August 2026
8 measurements spanning 7 days, net -3,803. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 620,894–625,837 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 19:04621,464-619
11 Aug 2026, 17:53622,083-681
10 Aug 2026, 15:01622,764-554
9 Aug 2026, 14:22623,318-487
8 Aug 2026, 16:22623,805-615
7 Aug 2026, 13:43624,420-769
6 Aug 2026, 13:01625,189-78
6 Aug 2026, 00:53625,267first reading

Engagement

17 posts held, back to 8 January 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 17 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 17 posts for this entry, the most recent from 20 May 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

22,522 reactions across 17 posts, in 1 kind.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 538877433962354002522,522100.0%

Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it isTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 22,522reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 8 January 2025 to 20 May 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
727
across the posts below
Posts paid on
17
of 17 we hold a reading for · 100%
Most on one post
187
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @earn_early. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 17 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 8 January 2025 to 20 May 2025. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

20 May 2025, 18:11 UTC≈127,000 views1,050 reactions43 Starsread 12 August 2026
Photo

$SWITCH TOKEN CLAIM STARTS You can start claiming your $SWITCH tokens right now Here's how it works: → The later you claim, the more tokens you get right away → If you claim early, part of your tokens will be locked for 3 months If you want 100% of your tokens, just wait until june 9 to claim everything at once. More details can be found here. Let's claim 🤟

custom 53887743396235400251,050

16 May 2025, 20:18 UTC≈120,000 views564 reactions46 Starsread 12 August 2026
Photo

$220M USD distributed to the community after the tap-to-earn phase yeah, for real dune for notcoin and earn binance launchpool okx jumpstart bybit trading campaigns @wallet staking campaign @earn & early notcoin explore dogs extra drop and more, and more is that what projects are supposed to do after tge? we are new in web3, sorry 💎

custom 5388774339623540025564

3 Feb 2025, 16:09 UTC≈189,000 views1,410 reactions29 Starsread 12 August 2026
Photo

@earn 🪙

custom 53887743396235400251,410

3 Feb 2025, 11:45 UTC≈172,000 views848 reactions19 Starsread 12 August 2026
Photo

🔥 early <> PocketFi | Results Total reward pool: 1.5% of the total supply Over 1M users joined the campaign. Rewards will be distributed to the top 20,000 participants who completed the tasks. List of Winners During the campaign, participants created ~5,000 memecoins, with a total trading volume of over $3M. The TGE and token distribution is scheduled for Q1 2025 — stay tuned!

custom 5388774339623540025848

31 Jan 2025, 19:01 UTC≈142,000 views871 reactions26 Starsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Earn x Lost Dogs | Phase 2 Results The 4th project on Earn Launchpool has ended. – 490M $WOOF distributed among top users – 500K+ participants Claims open February 3rd. Thanks for joining! 🪙

custom 5388774339623540025871

22 Jan 2025, 15:30 UTC≈145,000 views1,120 reactions27 Starsread 12 August 2026
Photo

The time has come 🪙

custom 53887743396235400251,120

17 Jan 2025, 18:01 UTC≈476,000 views774 reactions17 Starsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Earn x Lost Dogs | Phase 2 $WOOF is trading on exchanges, and @earn participants have received 243M $WOOF. Now, $WOOF holders and others can earn 2x rewards in new pools: · Hold WOOF: 75,000,000 · Hold NOT: 100,000,000 · Hold TON: 50,000,000 · Hold DOGS: 50,000,000 · Hold BUILD: 75,000,000 · Hold ANON: 20,000,000 · Hold Lost Dogs NFT: 20,000,000 · Notcoin Levels: 60,000,000 · Notcoin Stakers: 40,000,000 Total Re

custom 5388774339623540025774

17 Jan 2025, 13:28 UTC≈109,000 views890 reactions8 Starsread 12 August 2026

Bonuses from @earn Participants in the $CLAY and $WOOF launchpools received extra rewards during claiming: – 135,801,849 $CLAY – 20,125,306 $WOOF What a nice boost 🪙

custom 5388774339623540025890

17 Jan 2025, 10:01 UTC≈121,000 views627 reactions10 Starsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Earn x Lost Dogs | Results A total of 243M $WOOF has been distributed among the top crypto holders and Lost Dogs NFT owners (over 400K participants in total). Claim is now available. But don't worry, this isn't your last chance. 🪙

custom 5388774339623540025627

16 Jan 2025, 17:23 UTC≈107,000 views675 reactions10 Starsread 12 August 2026
Photo

EARLY <> POCKETFI | REMINDER Only 7 days left until the campaign ends. You still have time to join. At stake: 1.5% of the total supply for the top 20,000 participants. Complete tasks to earn even more points. Deadline: Jan.23, 23:59 UTC Join the campaign now

custom 5388774339623540025675

16 Jan 2025, 13:45 UTC≈97,000 views629 reactions13 Starsread 12 August 2026

Claim is now available 🪙@earn

custom 5388774339623540025629

14 Jan 2025, 15:05 UTC≈179,000 views1,950 reactions73 Starsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Earn x Not Pixel | Results The 3rd project on Earn Launchpool has concluded. 22,5M $PX were distributed among the top crypto holders, Notcoin Levels, and Stakers (almost 1M participants in total). Claiming will open in January. Stay tuned for updates. 🪙

custom 53887743396235400251,950

Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @earn_early. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 76,932 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 7 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“earn | early” (@earn_early), 621,464 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/earn_early.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.